There are many laws in the world today that some may find are neither rational nor fair for all the parties involved in the situation. I have chosen two laws that I do not think are logical‚ these two are apparent authority and executory process. The first law I will be discussing is an agency this is the right one person has to execute business on behalf of another person or corporation. There are three important parties involved in an agency relationship; the agent (this is who can enter a contract
Premium Debt Law English-language films
thefreedictionary.com. The duties are a series of common law‚ statutory‚ and equitable obligations. The duties are analogous to duties owed by trustees to beneficiaries‚ and by agents to principals. Directors owe duties to the corporation‚ and not to individual shareholders‚ employees or creditors outside exceptional circumstances. The duties of a director are divided in two sections‚ the common law duties and the statutory duties of directorship. Common law duties; Duty of Good Faith The most general obligation
Premium Corporation Corporate governance Types of business entity
Assignment Submission Form Module Name | Commercial and Company Law in Semester 2. | Name of Lecturer | Sheila McCarthy | | | Title of Assignment | Law CA Semester 2 -2013 | | | | | Campus | LIT Tipperary Thurles | Course | Bachelor Of Business Level 7 | Student ID(s) | P10011462 | Name of Student(s) | Martin G Lynch | Date | 13/03/13 | Word Count | 2004 | I declare that no element of this assignment has been plagiarised: Student Signature | | “An Agent is
Premium Contract Business law Agency law
is to change the law as it applies to the general population. A minority of Private Members’ Bills becomes law but‚ by creating publicity an issue‚ they may affect legislation indirectly. Like other Public Bills‚ private Member’s Bills can be introduced in either House and must go through the same set stages. However‚ as less time is allocated to these Bills‚ it’s likely they will proceed through all stages. A Bill is a proposal for a new law‚ or proposal to change an existing law‚ presented for
Free Criminal law Law Jurisdiction
Chapter questions 1‚2‚3‚5‚6‚7‚10 1. When does a promise constitute consideration? For a promise to constitute consideration‚ the promise must impose an obligation on the person making it. 2. May a promise that is conditional constitute consideration? Yes‚ such a promise consideration even if the condition is unlikely to occur. 3. What is the general rule about the adequacy of consideration? The adequacy of the consideration is irrelevant because the law does not prohibit bargains.
Premium Contract Contract law Law
Dustin Brown Student ID# 202011 BBA 3210‚ Business Law Research Project: Analyzing a Contract August 22‚ 2012 “Analyzing a Contract” Introduction I have identified a basic contract that is used when a provider and client have agreed to a specific service and payment for service (Savetz‚ 2012). The contract is at the end of this paper. In my scenario‚ the Client has requested the Provider to complete a concrete pad in the back yard of his new home. I will analyze this contract and identify
Premium Contract
deliberate intent to cause harm that exists when a person makes a statement with either knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard of the truth. actual malice is required to establish defamation against public figures. appropriation In tort law‚ the use by one person of another person’s name‚ likeness‚ or other identifying characteristic without permission and for the benefit of the user. assault any word or action intended to make another person fearful of immediate physical harm—a reasonably
Premium Tort law Tort
Business Law Name: Course: Instructor: Date: Business Law Legal Issue Both parties entered into a legally binding contract. The legal issue is a breach of contract. For a contract to be legitimate‚ it must have the following three elements; an offer must be made; there must be acceptance‚ and finally there must be consideration. Facts: The defendant entered into a legal agreement with the plaintiffs‚ Jackson Boris and Klara Koop. The defendant made an offer
Premium Contract
agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O‚ INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years” When Beriner and Sughroue went to work for Meras they violated their non-compete agreement by not waiting the specified three years before taking
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Court
Research Paper: The law laid down in Soloman v. Soloman and Co. is often considered the source on the basis of which the jurisprudence of corporate personality has been written world over. However‚ the history of corporate-commercial litigation has witnessed situations where in the Courts have gone beyond the corporate cloak and analyzed the working and the motives of the members or directors of the company: In doing the same‚ the Courts have evolved the concept of lifting or piercing the
Premium Corporation Company