malfunctions 24 hours later‚ causing an explosion. Injuries result to Jeremy‚ who lives next door to the factory and the explosion also causes business interruption for 3 weeks. Contract of works and materials - service and goods being provided - SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982 The fuel pump is defective (not clear if its defective)- s4(2) and (3) - it seems that C supplied this. Discuss There is exclusion term discuss courts approach and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 s7 is relevant
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law
MGMT 310 Hot Coffee Essay 3-31-13 Hot Coffee This film was very interesting to watch. It made me realize how many frivolous lawsuits that have occurred. The Stella Liebeck case was huge example. Yes I understand she suffered third degree burns and had to be hospitalized for a week or so to recover but it could have possibly been prevented. The right thing to do would be to be careful when handling the cup of hot coffee. The cup itself says to be careful and why would anyone put a cup of
Premium Jury Law Tort
Is it ever morally permissible to lie to someone? Describe a circumstance in which it seems that lying might make more people happy than telling the truth. Would lying be the right thing to do in that circumstance‚ or is it our moral duty to tell the truth‚ even then? I believe in some causes it is morally permissible to lie‚ but in only if no one is in danger or if telling a lie could prevent harm to someone. At Christmas time we had an angel tree for the youth of our church‚ my aunt happened
Premium Immanuel Kant Truth Deontological ethics
question is whether Micky has a contract with Ureach Mobile Co. Section 11 of Contracts Act 1950 provides who are competent to contract‚ that is those who are of the age of majority according to the law to which she is subject‚ have sound mind‚ and not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject (KrishnanL‚ RajooL‚ & VergisA.C‚2009). On the other hand‚ the Age of Majority Act 1971 states that the age of majority is 18 years and above‚ and anyone below that age would be regarded
Premium Contract
thefreedictionary.com. The duties are a series of common law‚ statutory‚ and equitable obligations. The duties are analogous to duties owed by trustees to beneficiaries‚ and by agents to principals. Directors owe duties to the corporation‚ and not to individual shareholders‚ employees or creditors outside exceptional circumstances. The duties of a director are divided in two sections‚ the common law duties and the statutory duties of directorship. Common law duties; Duty of Good Faith The most general obligation
Premium Corporation Corporate governance Types of business entity
deliberate intent to cause harm that exists when a person makes a statement with either knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard of the truth. actual malice is required to establish defamation against public figures. appropriation In tort law‚ the use by one person of another person’s name‚ likeness‚ or other identifying characteristic without permission and for the benefit of the user. assault any word or action intended to make another person fearful of immediate physical harm—a reasonably
Premium Tort law Tort
Business Law Name: Course: Instructor: Date: Business Law Legal Issue Both parties entered into a legally binding contract. The legal issue is a breach of contract. For a contract to be legitimate‚ it must have the following three elements; an offer must be made; there must be acceptance‚ and finally there must be consideration. Facts: The defendant entered into a legal agreement with the plaintiffs‚ Jackson Boris and Klara Koop. The defendant made an offer
Premium Contract
agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O‚ INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years” When Beriner and Sughroue went to work for Meras they violated their non-compete agreement by not waiting the specified three years before taking
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Court
What is a contract? A contract is an agreement enforceable by law. 2. What is an agreement? An agreement is an arrangement between parties that creates legal obligations between them. Generally an agreement is said to be arrived at when an offer or proposal made by one person is accepted by another‚ with the intention of creating mutual obligations between them. 5. What are the essential features of a contract? Minimum two parties :- Atleast two parties are needed to enter into a contact
Premium Contract Contract law
Research Paper: The law laid down in Soloman v. Soloman and Co. is often considered the source on the basis of which the jurisprudence of corporate personality has been written world over. However‚ the history of corporate-commercial litigation has witnessed situations where in the Courts have gone beyond the corporate cloak and analyzed the working and the motives of the members or directors of the company: In doing the same‚ the Courts have evolved the concept of lifting or piercing the
Premium Corporation Company