McGurn v. Bell Microproducts Inc. 284 F.3d 86 (Massachusetts) ISSUE OF THE CASE Bell Microproducts‚ Inc. mailed to McGurn an offer of employment that stated that if McGurn were terminated without cause during the first 12 months of employment‚ he would receive a severance package of $120‚000. McGurn crossed out 12 and replaced it with 24‚ and signed the contract. Bell did not acknowledge the change that had been made to the contract and hired the applicant. McGurn was terminated without cause
Premium Termination of employment Employment Layoff
of personal privacy‚ then a court will order disclosure. See Ray. Even still‚ the requested information must shed light on the agency’s performance of it’s statutory duties. See Ray. This is also referred to as the “central-purpose” doctrine. See Law Review. Meaning‚ does
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
regulate the indoor artificial tanning industry‚ but instead the parents of the minor. Deeper economic issues‚ a progressing invasive government‚ and even an interference with one of our inalienable rights are all reasons to oppose this potential new law. Not only is the Federal government banning indoor tanning for minors‚ but applying a 10% tax as well. Businesses will lose revenue due to a loss of income from a large percentage of customers being under 18. Ultimately‚ tanning salons across the
Premium Sun tanning United States Declaration of Independence Federal government of the United States
ADMS 3541 Midterm 2 Review – Winter 2014 Question 1: The following parts of the question are not related: a) What are the four fundamental tax minimization strategies discussed in the textbook? Define or describe each one briefly and provide an example (i.e. no mone than two sentences). (b) What are the advantages of buying whole life insurance over term life insurance? (c) Define or describe briefly the following terms: (i) Participating term policy (ii) No-fault insurance (iii) Self-insurance
Premium Insurance
Roo Events Pte Ltd 11 Arc Road Singapore 982156 10 JUNE 2012 Corporate Gifts INC Ah Hood Avenue 4 Singapore 131474 Dear James‚ My purpose of writing this letter regarding the 200 cups I ordered from your company. As your long time customer‚ I am shock when I received the goods. Out of the 200 we ordered‚ there are 100 cups with cracks on it and 50 cups are in the wrong colour ! For the past 10 years‚ Roo Events Pte Ltd had been ordering corporate gifts from your company. From your
Premium Customer service Corporation Customer
and then only managed to do so under heavy doses of tranquilizers prescribed by her doctor‚ Morton Mallard. Consider the following when writing this essay: · Was a crime committed? · Was there any negligence involved in this case? · What laws and rights were violated? · Who should be held liable for the damages (physical and mental)? · Discuss the possible tort liability in this incident. Assault‚ battery‚ infliction of emotional distress‚ and false imprisonment all should be
Premium Tort law Tort
to give back the ring. Rodger sued and Janis appealed. The main purpose of this article is to decide whether the receiver of an engagement ring must return the ring or its equivalent value when the donor breaks the engagement. Pennsylvania law treats the giving of an engagement ring as a conditional gift. “ A gift given by a man to woman on condition that she will embark on the sea of matrimony with him is no different from a gift based on the condition that the receiver sail on any other
Premium Contract Law Supreme Court of the United States
co reconditioned and repaired the scooter. And sold it to Mr. A for Rs 50‚000. ABC and co told Mr. A that the scooter is a new scooter. Is Mr. A a consumer? And does he have any remedy under consumer protection act Mr. Q was going abroad for a business trip for two months. He wanted to give a power of attorney to his friend. Hence Mr. Q sent the Power of attorney in a PDF form through an Email. Is this power of attorney valid? White Detergents ltd was a leading detergent brand in the market
Premium Contract Breach of contract Consumer protection
immediately the car was sold to him. Having to hear that the car was already been sold‚ the plaintiffs wish to sue Defendant for breach of contract. This will depend on whether there is a valid contract formed in each respective case. Rules/Principle The law of contract: There must be a legally binding contract between two or more parties. On
Premium Law Contract Common law
Respondent: Led to permanent injury. Interviewer: (81:13) But how did the actions of your friend and your play dad‚ that their actions led to you having permanent injury? Respondent: No. My play dad didn’t even… My friend‚ yes is… Yes‚ he is responsible for my injury. Interviewer: (81:36) What was it that… Let me just get this right. You’re saying it led to greater… Your friend’s actions led to you having a greater injury? Respondent: Mm-hmm (agreement). Interviewer: (81:49) What exactly did he do
Premium Injury Psychology Injuries