CLAW1001: Commercial Transactions A Case Analysis Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44 Submitted by: Sindhuja Shankar SID: 305 127 950 3/10/2007 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Case Summary 3 Facts 3 Issues 3 Ratio 3 Decision 4 Critical Analysis 4 Commercial Implications 5 Legal Implications 6 Conclusion 6 Bibliography 7 Appendix † Research Plan 8 Introduction The case Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd[1] confirms the long held doctrine that employers are vicariously
Premium Law Agency Employment
Insurance is a means for persons and businesses to protect themselves against the risk of loss. An individual who purchases automobile insurance may be reimbursed by the insurer if his or her car is stolen. Insurance is crucial to personal‚ business‚ and estate planning. Insurance is defined as a contract whereby one party undertakes to identify another against loss‚ damage or liability arising from an unknown event. It is a means of transferring and distributing risk of loss. The risk of loss
Free Insurance
1. Give an example of a case that would fall under diversity jurisdiction. Explain all of the key elements of such a case. A federal court’s power to hear any case where the amount in controversy exceeds $75‚000 and no plaintiff shares a state of citizenship with any defendant. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Diversity jurisdiction is one of the two main types of subject-matter jurisdiction in federal court. Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary The power of the federal courts to decide
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
E-BUSINESS STRATEGY AND ITS ECONOMICS: JUSTIFYING IT INVESTMENTS REPORT BY: PRIYA GUPTA HR017 NAMAN KHANNA HR027 ANURAG MOHAPATRA HR033 MANNAT NARULA HR037 UZMA SHAIKH HR047 RUPAM SRIVASTAV HR055 TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC PAGE NO. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW: E Business 3 Common Metrics of E-Business 4 E-Strategy 5 IT investments
Premium Strategic management Revenue Business process
other contracting party. There are certain rules that govern a valid contract. THE ISSUE: The issue in the case is whether the agreement was legally binding upon Dream Design or whether it failed for want of consideration. THE LAW: If the promise merely fulfils an existing contractual duty to the promisor‚ he does not provide consideration to buy the buy promisor’s promise. In the case‚ Atlas Express Ltd. V.Kafco (Importers and Distributors) [1989] 3 W.L.R. 389 K entered into a contract
Premium Contract
Business Entities Cases BUS 415 July 9‚ 2012 Restaurant/ Bar Case Lou‚ Jose and Miriam can go into business in the form of a corporation‚ or partnership‚ or LLC where Miriam provides monetary capital‚ while Lou and Jose provide manpower. An operating agreement or purchase-option agreement should be established under which Lou and Jose could each buy a predetermined portion of the business at a predetermined cost. If they choose to establish
Premium Discrimination Corporation Employment
80. As courts decide cases involving the Internet and new kinds of issues not addressed previously‚ what role‚ if any‚ does precedent play? What role should it play? What difficulties could arise? A court would first look to see if any applicable statutes apply to the situation. Beyond that‚ the court would consider whether or not there are any earlier relevant court decisions applicable to the case. The court might find a similar case‚ though one not involving the Internet‚ and extend its application
Premium Missouri Mississippi River Jurisdiction
than for independent contractors‚ in the case of company liquidation employees are treated as preferential creditors whereas independent contractors are treated as unsecured debts‚ employers are responsible for the deduction of tax and social insurance of their employees but are not responsible for the deduction of tax and social insurance of independent contractors that they pay for a service. Examples of How to Make the Distinction the Control Test Case: Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd –vs
Premium Employment
B Bai 1 : Business Law: 40. Principle of Law: In this case‚ Esposito hired Excel Construction Company to repair a porch roof. All terms of the agreement were specified in a written contract. And the dispute occurred when Excel had repaired the rear porch roof because in the agreement failed to specify whether it was the front or rear porch that needed repair. Under civil law‚ two parties here had signed a civil contract in writing. Because the contract failed to specify clearly front or rear
Premium Contract Drill Law
Addressing International Legal and Ethical Issues Contemporary Business Law/LAW 421 Monday‚ 18 February 2013 The issues involved in resolving legal disputes in international Transactions are the changes that are mad to international laws and regulations. The largest focus is the minimum wages. What is most discussed is China has a cheap labor force compared to America. This increases the profits for the company who outsources to cheaper labor cost. If the China manufacturing do not meet
Free Law Contract