Introduction to Legal Studies and Basic Contract Law- Course Work Assignment Mrs Hyndley is the owner of two properties that she rents to students in the Belfast area. In January 2008 she asks her friend and next door neighbour Frederick‚ a local estate agent‚ to collect the rents from her tenants while she goes off on a 6 month round the world cruise. She does not discuss terms or payment with Frederick. However‚ Frederick agrees and does collect the rents. When Mrs Hyndley returns to Belfast
Premium Contract
Case Lets ABC and co was partnership firm which had dealership of Scooters Company ltd‚ bought a second hand scooter from Mr. B. ABC and co reconditioned and repaired the scooter. And sold it to Mr. A for Rs 50‚000. ABC and co told Mr. A that the scooter is a new scooter. Is Mr. A a consumer? And does he have any remedy under consumer protection act Mr. Q was going abroad for a business trip for two months. He wanted to give a power of attorney to his friend. Hence Mr. Q sent the Power of
Premium Contract Breach of contract Consumer protection
Problem 1 a) Can Tim sue his father Jack on the basis that the parties intended to contract‚ and that sufficient consideration was applied? b) The relevant rules are every simple contract must be supported by consideration‚ a promise to fulfil the terms of a contract is not always good consideration‚ and the rule that an agreement that is commercial in character can amount to a binding contract c) Todd v Nicol [1957] SASR 72 (Supreme Court of Australia) d) Yes‚ Tim might be successful in court
Premium Contract
determining whether s51(xx) supports a law‚ we need to determine whether the character of the law by reference to the creation of rights‚ powers‚ liabilities‚ duties and privileges belonging to a s51(xx) corporation is sufficiently connected to s51(xx) (McHugh J in Re Dingjan; Gleeson CJ‚ Gummow‚ Hayne‚ Heydon and Crennan JJ in Work Choices; Grain Pool). Sufficient connection means that the law must have some significance for a s51(xx) corporation‚ and the law must regulate the conduct which have beneficial
Premium Law Constitution Obligation
disputes. It is forbidden in Islamic law by Qur’an when the operation concerned is risky and could result in deceit of one of the parties (http://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gharar.asp). In this case‚ the U.S could claim that the reparation cost of breaching the contract could be classified as Gharar as it is specific to Islamic law: Saudi being an Islamic country with applicable jurisdiction‚ the US could claim gharar as the cost of breaching the contract was not specified and could be speculated
Premium Contract
BROKAW v. WINFIELD MT UNION COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUSINESS LAW 211 A tort is a civil wrong or injury other than breach of contract. A court will provide a solution or action for damages. Sometimes an individual may commit what is considered an assault. A situation involved this athletic event where the tort occurred during the course of play before the whistle has blown. This behavior may result in a penalty and a suspension‚ but it is not compensable by means of the civil liability way
Premium Common law Law Tort
QUESTION 3 Based on the case given Richard entered only into a donation agreement in terms of which he will provide a free daily lunch to members of the political party‚ after freightened by Jonathan’s threat. Therefore this contract is not with Richard’s consent. According to the case of situation‚ there was Coercion and Undue Influence by the political party and Jonathan. “Coercion” is the committing‚ or threatening to commit any act forbidden by the Panel Code‚ or the unlawful detaining or
Premium Contract Contract law
DISTANCE EDUCATION B B A (II YEAR) PAPER 2.4 BUSINESS LAW Paper 2.2 Commercial Law : Business Law Indian Contract Act 1872 : Meaning and essentials of a valid contract Formation of contract – Performance of contract – Termination and discharge of contract – Remedies for breach of contract – Quast contract Special Contracts : Indemnity of guarantee – Bailment – Agency Sale of Goods Act‚ 1930 : Contract of sale – Conditions and warranties – Transfer of property
Premium Contract Contract law
1. The fact of the case Respondent (Schmidt) was a consulting engineer for the appellant company (Kepong Prospecting Ltd). The appellant company was the holders of certain mining leases in respect of deposits of iron ore. They did not work these deposits themselves but allowed them to be worked on tribute by another company named Kepong Mines Ltd. Their business in practice would seem to be confined to collecting the tribute and distributing it to their shareholders after making arrangements
Premium Civil procedure Money Appeal
Cuong Khong Bill Tennyson/ Business Law January 24‚ 2013 BRIEFING CASES… COMMONWEALTH v. BERGGREN 398 Mass. 338 (1986) Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts‚ Barnstable. May 6‚ 1986. August 26‚ 1986. ============================================================================ FACTS: On March 29‚ 1983‚ about 8:28 P.M.‚ Patrolman Michael Aselton of the Barnstable police department was on radar duty at Old Stage Road in Centerville. He saw the defendant’s motorcycle speed by him and commenced
Premium Jury Crime Court