ii. Stakeholder One: Congress (Democratic Party) Since Democratic Party is the one who proposed this law‚ most Democratic senators supported the medical device tax law. Obviously‚ this law will make the implementation of Affordable Care Act become more easier. The Affordable Care Act will be successfully only when government has enough money. Moreover‚ although many medical device manufacturers asserted that this tax is harmful to their businesses‚ these senators think that this tax just a small
Premium Health care Health insurance Medicine
Section B Case study 1 The study case states that Anthony and his wife were estranged‚ but Anthony wanted his wife can return home. Therefore‚ Anthony promised to transfer the matrimonial home into her name. They had saw a lawyer‚ and prepared and signed a formal agreement. However‚ after returning home more than one year ago‚ Anthony refused to keep his promise‚ so his wife wants to get advice to get the house. Therefore‚ relating to the above scenario is the case of “letter of comfort”.
Premium Marriage Case study Consideration
and received some payments. The Government subsequently stopped its subsidy scheme and the Plaintiff sued the Government for subsidies it claimed it was due. Rules There was no contract. The statement made by the Commonwealth was not offered as consideration for the plaintiff buying the wool. The Court stated that in cases such as this: ‘… it is necessary‚ … that it should be made to appear that the statement or announcement which is relied on as a promise [here the subsidy statement] was really
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
perfectly fine contract. -Void: contract cannot be used. -Voidable: a party of the contract has the right to declare it void. -Unilateral Mistake: mistake by one party‚ has no effect on the contract. Contract must be followed‚ even with mistakes. Valid contract. -Mutual Mistake: mistake made by both parties. Causes agreements to be void. -Existence of subject matter. -Nature of the agreement. (For some really good reason‚ one of the parties does not understand the contract. Ex.‚ language
Premium Contract
HA2022 Business Law Tri 1‚ 2011 QUESTION 1 Sue Fairbairn is 35 years old. She is a commercial boat skipper who works for Whale Watching. She has held a commercial skipper’s licence for 15 years and is considered to be a very experienced whale watching skipper. To ensure she is always at the peak of her health she has annual medical examinations‚ which are conducted by her local doctor. Last week she was booked to take a group of tourists on a whale watching cruise leaving from Byron Bay and
Premium Real estate Whale Humpback whale
Review the case of Any Kind Checks Cashed‚ Inc. v. Talcott in Chapter 30 of the text. Write a short paper on whether or not you agree with the Court’s decision. Is it fair? In your opinion‚ is Any Kind a HDC? A holder in due course is a holder who takes an instrument without “apparent evidence of forgery or alteration” for value‚ in good faith‚ and without notice of certain claims and defenses. In the case of Any Kind Checks Cashed‚ Inc. v. Talcott it was crucial to determine whether holder of
Premium Court Appeal Trial
organisational context in relation to the relevant issues with regard to the fundamental principles that underpin the marketing process. 3. Apply theory to practice in order to generate solutions to a simple problem that addresses major impact on business organisations. 4. Evidence judgement in being able to choose and justify a solution to the problem posed within the marketing environment. 5. Be self critical and reflective in extracting learning‚ knowledge and skills. From the learning experience
Premium Marketing
QUESTION Running late for his exciting evening law class‚ Sam desperately seeks out a car park in the CBD of Melbourne‚ state of Victoria Australia. He spots the car park operated by Citipark Ltd. Sam drives up a ramp which has raised concrete barriers on either side. As it is rush hour‚ there are a few cars in front of him and soon some more line up behind him. Sam stopped his car at the barrier entrance of the car park which had a mechanical arm preventing cars moving into the parking
Premium Parking Parking lot Parking space
MGMT 310 Hot Coffee Essay 3-31-13 Hot Coffee This film was very interesting to watch. It made me realize how many frivolous lawsuits that have occurred. The Stella Liebeck case was huge example. Yes I understand she suffered third degree burns and had to be hospitalized for a week or so to recover but it could have possibly been prevented. The right thing to do would be to be careful when handling the cup of hot coffee. The cup itself says to be careful and why would anyone put a cup of
Premium Jury Law Tort
BUS 115 – Business Law Module 2- Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Case 3-3 “Discovery” Should a party to a lawsuit have to hand over its confidential business secrets as part of a discovery request? Why or why not? What limitations might a court consider imposing before requiring ATC to produce this material? The party to the law suit should hand over information during the discovery phase. However‚ discovery is allowed only if the information is relevant to the claim or defense
Premium Law Civil procedure Jury