wCASE LAW * STILK v MYRICK (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts: the captain of a ship promises his crew that if they shared between them the work of two seamen who had deserted‚ the wages of the deserters would be shared out between them. Held: the promise was not binding because the seamen gave no consideration. They were already contractually bound to do any extra work to complete the voyage. * HEARTLEY v PONSONBY (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts:
Premium Contract Contract law
physician ownership‚ Medicare cases‚ and even out of network waivers. A surgical center takes a lot of endeavor in running a surgical center as well as learning what type of legal issues might be included when running this type of a center. Legal Concerns A main concern that is a prevalent legal debate in an ambulatory surgery center is when an owner is getting out of the business and a new owner is going to “buy-out” that owner. Many centers struggle with their current contracts regarding buying as well
Premium Ambulatory surgery center Hospital Physician
judge of the Federal Court. Every proceeding in the Federal Court is according to section 74 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964‚ heard and disposed off by three judges or such greater uneven number of judges as the Chief Justice may in any particular case determine. In the absence of the Chief Justice the most senior member of the Court shall preside. Article 122(2) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Chief Justice‚ if he considers that the interests of justice so require‚ may nominate a judge
Premium Judge Jurisdiction Appeal
in the entertainment business providing models and dancers for the industry. In the meantime‚ they entered into a contract of employment with Tyra. Tyra is to act as their event manager. The terms of the contract states that Tyra will be paid RM10‚000 a month and will continue to work with the company once the company has been formed‚ for a period of three years. Three months later‚ a company known as CayoteUgly Bhd (CUB) was formed. CUB’s MOA expressly states that the business of the company is to
Premium Corporation Management Breach of contract
incidents‚ Lowell Wilson‚ the superintendent at Greif Brothers’ Youngstown plant‚ decided to hire a security company to guard Greif Brothers’ property. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO In April 1987‚ Wilson‚ on behalf of Greif Brothers‚ entered into a contract with Youngstown Security Patrol‚ Inc. (“YSP”) to supply a uniformed security guard to “deter theft [and] vandalism” on Greif Brothers’ property during specified hours. Wilson told YSP’s owner and president‚ Carl Testa‚ that he wanted the security
Premium Security guard
Business law | CASE STUDY ONSESAMWARE | | | | | SUBMITTED BY:Randeep SinghVarinder GillLovedeep Singh | CASE STUDY History Sesamware is a Japanese software company which is very popular for open source software. Sesamware got international approval with an online multiplayer fantasy dimension game‚ Para World in mid-1990. Para world was very popular in the world between 2001 and 2004. Firstly‚ it was installed as part of the bundle downloaded by hundreds of millions of gamers around the
Premium Competition World Trade Organization International trade
There is a history of contamination in England and Wales since the industrial revolution‚ and it would be necessary to perform this check to protect Miss Troy‚ in case she bought contaminated land which she could then be responsible to remediate at her own expense. She would then also be likely to file a claim in negligence against Tract & Co. A typical report such as an RPS Environmental Risk certificate would
Premium The Edge Patent Real estate
P85‚000.00. The pertinent provision of the contract reads: 3. For and in consideration of the use of the leased premises and above-mentioned equipment‚ the LESSEE hereby agrees to pay the LESSOR a monthly rental of EIGHTY FIVE THOUSAND PESOS (P85‚000.00) for the first year of this Contract reckoned from the date of signing. The monthly rental shall be payable within the first five days of each month without need of demand at the office of the LESSOR. In case of delay in the payment of the said monthly
Premium 1966 1970 Appeal
__ (2013). The Respondent‚ John Wiley & Sons (“Wiley”)‚ brought a claim against Petitioner‚ Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99 (“Kirtsaeng”)‚ for violation of the Copyright Act‚ 17 U.S.C. Sections 101-810. Facts Kirtsaeng began as a legal case in U.S. District Court‚ New York‚ (2010) and culminated in a U.S. Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) ruling‚ March 13‚ 2013. Both the District Court and the 2nd District Federal appellate rulings favored Wiley which caused Kirtsaeng to seek cert which was granted
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Copyright
Business Law Quiz 1a - Key Chapter 1 - True or False 1. Congress can only pass legislation that falls within the limits set up by the US Constitution. T 2. Only the US federal government has a constitution. F 3. State agencies take precedence over conflicting federal agency regulations. F Review Question Bob has a dispute with Ace Company over a perceived product defect. Bob hires a lawyer and after discussing the facts and issues‚ Bob’s attorney agrees to file a lawsuit
Premium Law Common law Corporation