parties in this situation. First‚ Greg could go after the Limited Liability Corporation members for when Mike yelled at Greg after he criticized the Hunter Thompson Novels‚ a form of assault. In LLCs‚ the profits and losses are “passed through” the business to each member of the LLC. Secondly‚ Greg could go after Strip Mall 4 for damages resulting from the assault from Mike. Greg could also personally sue Mike for the tort he committed. 2) Shawn‚ Bryan‚ and Mike’s liability to: each other‚ Suppliers
Premium Limited liability company Corporation
used mainly for transporting goods on public roads. S 3(2) a person is not a consumer if the goods (regardless of price paid) are acquired: -for the purpose of re-supply or -for using them up or transforming them‚ in trade or commerce (business) in production or manufacture or -repairing or treating other goods for fixtures on land. Crago v Multiquip Pty Ltd (1998) Ostrich egg incubator is not ordinarily acquired for personal‚ household or domestic use. Atkinson v Hastings Deering
Premium Marketing Costs Cost
The action failed because there was no indication that the arrangement was intended to be a contract. .1 Difference between the Tortuous Liability and Contractual Liability. 3.1.1 Contract Law Contract law is that body of rules that govern contractual agreements between persons or merchants. Contract laws outline what a person can or cannot include in a contract‚ and what the remedies are if a party breaches their contractual duties. For example: Silva contracts with James to purchase a van for
Premium Contract Tort Contract law
example Sarah has committed larceny by taking personal property that belongs to another person with the intent of claiming the property as her own. 2.In the second example Sarah has committed robbery by taken anothers property by force. 3.In this final example Sarah has committed burglary while breaking and entering. Noting the basic differences regarding the crimes: In the first example of Larceny‚ which involves no force or threat to human life it would be considered the least severe penalty
Premium Theft Robbery
1. Invested $70000 in business. 2. business purchased supplies and carpet the amount of supplies 500 and the amount of carpet was $50 paid in cash 3. The advertising of business on cash of 200 4. The business collected loan from bank of 8000 5. The business purchased truck of 9000 in cash 6. Business purchased 100 computer systems of 60000. The business pay 30000 in cash and the rest of amount will after 3 week 7. Business purchased supplies of $500 and write on note that will return after
Premium Accounts receivable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Computer
Issue Is there a valid contract between Khalid and Siti? Law and Application When Khalid is interested in buying Siti’s painting which she had named “Hawa”‚ Khalid met Siti and told her that he will pay her RM5‚000 for “Hawa”. This is an offer. Offer had be defined in S2(a) Contracts Act 1950 as “when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything‚ with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to the act or abstinence‚ he is said to make a proposal”
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
Sterling computer has entered into a partnership with NoBugs a microchip processing computer. The collaboration was developing into a something successful until an incident put a strain in the business relationship. Some month ago Sterling computer has had several of their computers explode shortly after customers install them. Upon an investigation which was conducted by Sterling researchers have discovered evidence of NoBugs’s microchips aggravating a dormant defect in their computers‚ causing
Premium Contract Civil procedure Lawsuit
a new dress‚ shoes and accessories for the date. He does not turn up and does not text you with an explanation. Can you sue him? If so‚ why? If not‚ why not? She would be unable to sue him as this is a social agreement which is unenforceable by law. Neither party has entered into a legally binding contract. Should you chose to break such an agreement‚ the consequences will be no more serious than upsetting or dissappointing your friends. This is similar to the case of Spellman v Spellman‚ in
Premium Contract
LAW PROJECT Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where world is a single platform for carrying out trade and commerce. Under the Guidance of Prof. Anant Ambdekar Submitted by Devaki Parikh (102) Yesha Bhatt (104) Abhijit Thakkar (106) Neilay Mehta (108) Mayuresh Parab (110) Yash Shah (112) Shaival Shah (114) Vishal Sonwani (116) Varsha Gupta (118) Divya Singh (120) INDEX Sr No. Particulars Pg No. 1 MRTP Act‚1969 3 2 Need for Competition
Premium Competition law Cartel Capitalism
Unit- 5 Indian Sale of Goods Act‚ 1930 1. Contract of Sale – Meaning A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price. There may be a contract of sale between one part-owner and another [Sec 4(1)]. A contract of sale may be absolute or conditional [Sec 4(2)]. The term ‘contract of sale’ includes both a ‘sale’ and an ‘agreement to sell’. 2. Essentials of a Contract of Sale (Refer text for details)
Premium Contract Contract law