There are many laws in the world today that some may find are neither rational nor fair for all the parties involved in the situation. I have chosen two laws that I do not think are logical‚ these two are apparent authority and executory process. The first law I will be discussing is an agency this is the right one person has to execute business on behalf of another person or corporation. There are three important parties involved in an agency relationship; the agent (this is who can enter a contract
Premium Debt Law English-language films
Mount Kenya University Nairobi Campus Department of Law Bachelor of Law Law of Tort II Professor Manyasi (Lecturer) Adm./113/01151 Question: What is the relationship between easement and the law of tort? Discuss. An easement is an interest in land which is created by express agreement‚ prior use‚ or necessity that permits one person to make use of another’s estate. An affirmative easement gives one person the right to use another’s land; a negative easement prevents the
Premium Easement Common law Property
than $75‚000 in potential damages may be filed in a federal court. 2. ｂ : n the legal system of the United States‚ a long arm statute is a law which allows a court to exercise jurisdiction over people and companies in other states. owever‚there are a number of ways in which jurisdiction is limited. In the case of a long arm statute‚ the law involved is the law limiting personal jurisdiction‚ determining where people can be tried on the basis of their residence and connections. Normally‚ a court in
Premium Law Jurisdiction
Mitsubishi to sell twelve boxcar loads of plywood to Crown and Mitsubishi should import the wood from Taiwan and deliver it to Crown’s plant in Atlanta.Mitsubishi shipped the wood from Taiwan to Savannah.However‚ in Savannah‚as the railroad was negligent in loading the train which caused the cargo to shift during the trip‚finally the wood got damaged. Issue The issue of the case is that which party should bear the risk of loss given that the railroad’s negligence in loading the train during transport
Premium Tort Common law The Damage
A contract can be defined as an agreement containing promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and obligations and enforceable in a court of law (Gibson & Fraser‚ 2012‚ Business Law‚ p303). A contract must be satisfied certain legal requirements which are agreements‚ intention to create legal relations‚ considerations and capacity. Agreement = Offer + Acceptance Therefore‚ here apply the rule
Premium Contract
Business Law 115-351 Paper Topic Submission Form Name: suzi freitas I m a miller wrapper at PERGO. We make flooring‚ wall bases‚ stairnoses‚ quarter rounds etc. I would like to know about the rights of an employee over his/her employer‚ when it comes to take few hours off in two days in a week‚ for he/her educations. This is about me and my employer. I was working with them for 3 years and I used to be one of their potential workers. And then I took a decision to continue my education
Premium Employment Law
signifies to another his willingness to do or abstain from doing anything‚ with a view to obtain assent of the other to such act or abstinence‚ he is said to make a proposal. Apparently in the case that Yatie had made an offer or proposal to her business partner‚ Tina to supply handcrafts by sending an offer letter to Tina. Tina had received the offer letter in the next day and she had accepted the offer by asking her staff‚ Anis to fax a letter of acceptance as soon as possible to Yatie. According
Premium Contract
Questions Learning ResourcesTextbook: Business Law Seventh Edition‚ 2010 Henry R. Cheeseman Prentice Hall 1) According to Judge Jerome Frank‚ uncertainty in the law: a. is an unfortunate accident b. should be avoided whenever possible c. is of immense social value d. does not exist in the U.S. legal system 2) Which of the following is most consistent with the Natural Law School of jurisprudence? e. Law is based on moral and ethical principles
Free Common law Law Supreme Court of the United States
consumer goods (UCTA) will be explained. Lastly‚ Peter will be advised regarding this issue. 2. Peter v Salesperson Applicable Law 1: Issue This issue is whether the advertisement brochure is an invitation to treat. It is also important to note whether the exemption clause in the brochure makes the invitation to treat‚ permanent. Applicable Law Firstly‚ an invitation to treat is not an offer. It is an invitation for an offeror to begin negotiations‚ make an offer‚ but does not
Premium Contract
agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O‚ INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years” When Beriner and Sughroue went to work for Meras they violated their non-compete agreement by not waiting the specified three years before taking
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Court