the factory and the explosion also causes business interruption for 3 weeks. Contract of works and materials - service and goods being provided - SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982 The fuel pump is defective (not clear if its defective)- s4(2) and (3) - it seems that C supplied this. Discuss There is exclusion term discuss courts approach and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 s7 is relevant note W is a non consumer and the term is subject to the test of reasonableness The term may be considered
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law
Web Quiz Assignment Name: Adamson‚ Law for Business and Personal Use‚ 17e‚ Xtra! Quiz‚ Chapter 6 Offers that require the offeree to accept by communicating the requested promise to the offeror are: a. unilateral contracts. 1. b. bilateral contracts. c. matching acceptance rule. d. mirror image contracts. When the current market price is not specified in a contract between merchants for the sale of goods‚ but the current market price is understood to be the basis of the contract‚ the price
Premium Contract
Rhythm‚ Harmony‚ Texture‚ Web-Lecture‚ and Text‚ pp. 1-15‚ Test 1 |Started on |Sunday‚ 25 August 2013‚ 08:45 PM | |Completed on |Sunday‚ 25 August 2013‚ 09:04 PM | |Time taken |19 mins 8 secs | |Grade |100 out of a maximum of 100 (100%) | |Feedback |Outstanding! | Question 1 Marks: 6 In triple
Premium Music Melody Rhythm
00. Advise Dahari. (Total: 20 marks) Question 1 is about the law contract it entails issues regarding an invitation to treat (ITT)‚ the fact shows that James has placed an advertisement at the Star newspaper for the sale of his BMW motorbike. This is advertisement is not an offer‚ it had similar with the cases of‚ Majumder v A-G of Sarawak. For the example cases of Majumder v A-G of Sarawak‚ the Malaysia court held that such advertisement is invitation to treat
Premium Contract
The preliminary issue in the question is fast food restaurant is vicariously liable for the Cathy’s negligence. Since the concerns about the law of tort‚ the following analysis will focus on the possible tortuous liability instead of the potential breach of the contractual obligation and the criminal acts. In principle of vicarious liability‚ to make an employer liable for a wrong committed by an employee‚ the plaintiff must establish that: 1. defendant is an employee ( as opposed to an independent
Premium Tort law Employment Vicarious liability
COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION E PART 5 (Chapters 18-21) Approximate Problem Topic Time E-I Long-Term Contracts. 15 min. E-II Installment Sales Method. 20 min. E-III Deferred Income Taxes. 25 min. E-IV Pensions. 15 min. E-V Leases. 25 min. 100 min. Problem E-I — Long-Term Contracts. Edwards Company contracted on 4/1/14 to construct a building for $2‚400‚000. The project was completed in 2016. Additional data follow: 2014 2015 2016 Costs incurred
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Depreciation
30th May Thursday 11-12 (replacement) 1b) Negligence misrep – For this‚ the common law negligent misrep is followed- i.e. that is duty of care‚ “special relationship” ‚ breach of standard of care‚ causation‚ and remoteness. 1c) Duress is pressure exerted by one person to coerce (influence someone to do smth) another to contract on particular terms. The main types are duress of the person “actual or threatened violence or unlawful imprisonment”‚ duress of goods “wrongful detaining‚ damaging or
Premium Contract law Contract Tort
Employee Monitoring and Legal Liability 1. Employers can bear legal responsibility if they do not adequately monitor their employees. This is why sometimes extreme measures are taken to keep track of employee’s computer usage. There is a case from New Jersey several years ago in which a company was held liable by an appellate court because an employee transmitted child pornography from his workplace computer. The court ruled this way because the employer had a policy which stated that all email
Premium Employment Law Privacy
Text and Cases Thirteenth Edition Robert N. Anthony Ross G. Walker Professor Emeritus Graduate School of Business Administration Harvard University David F. Hawkins Lovett-Learned Professor of Business Administration Graduate School of Business Administration Harvard University Kenneth A. Merchant Deloitte & Touche LLP Chair of Accountancy Leventhal School of Accounting University of Southern California McGraw-Hill Irwin Contents PARTI FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 1 Chapter 1 The
Premium Cost accounting Management accounting Depreciation
3. Contract Law “Is My Agreement an Enforceable Contract?” The Law of Contract involves answering 4 questions: (1) Is my agreement an enforceable contract? Are all of the elements of a contract present. (2) If so‚ what does it require me (and the other party) to do? - What “promises” have become terms of the contract. (3) Can I get out of it (without paying some form of penalty)? - Was the formation of the contract defective in some way (ie were there any ‘vitiating elements’ present)
Premium Contract