The Implications of the Sarbanes Oxley Act on the Accounting Profession Abstract On July 30‚ 2002‚ the Sarbanes Oxley Act (also known as SOX) was signed into law by President George W. Bush. The Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 is a federal law that set new or improved standards for all U.S. public company boards‚ management and public accounting firms. Covered in the eleven titles are additional corporate board responsibilities‚ auditing requirements and criminal penalties. This
Premium Internal control Enron Auditing
Sarbanes – Oxley: Where Information Technology‚ Finance‚ and Ethics Meet The Sarbanes – Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 was enacted in response to the high-profile Enron and WorldCom financial scandals to protect shareholders and the general public from accounting errors and fraudulent practices by organizations. One primary component of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is the dentition of which records are to be stored and for how long. For this reason‚ the legislation not only affects financial departments‚ but
Premium Internal control Audit Sarbanes–Oxley Act
Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley drafted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or "SOX" in 2002 in order to curb the incidence of corporate fraud. The “Act” was signed into law on July 30th 2002 by President George W. Bush with the express purpose of restoring public confidence in the financial markets; and after enacting “the Act”‚ neither Sarbanes or Oxley would run for re-election in the 2006 elections (Jahmani & Dowling‚ 2008). The intent of the SOX Act was to protect investors‚ and
Premium Enron Internal control Audit
responsibility increase * Special sections of SOX that increase accountants responsibility by imposing criminal liability------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -3- * Accountants independence resulting in a higher responsibility of accountants------- -4- * Fraud decrease as a consequence of increased transparency of financial reporting -- -5- 3. The second effect of Sarbanes-Oxley Act: the education sphere of accounting * New
Premium Internal control Enron Auditing
Should Smaller Public Companies be Exempted from Complying with SOX Section 404(b)? ABSTACT On July 21‚ 2010 the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act provided the non-accelerated public companies (those with a market capital below $75 million) a permanent exemption from complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404(b). The Section 404(b) would have required these smaller companies to do what larger companies over the $75 million market cap are currently doing;
Premium Audit Internal control Auditing
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act LAW 421 Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act This article review is on the article written by David S. Addington called “Congress Should Repeal or Fix Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to Help Create Jobs.” The Heritage Foundation published the article on September 30 2013. In the article‚ the author addresses concerns among companies staying in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The author indicates that section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act has caused
Premium Internal control Enron Certified Public Accountant
governance. On the other hand‚ compliance with the Sarbanes Oxley Act is expensive‚ and relatively more so for smaller public companies. While no doubt compliance with the SOX has improved transparency and corporate accountability‚ at what cost are these aims achieved? Already there are scathing critiques that compliance with the SOX has reduced America’s international competitive edge against foreign financial service providers‚ saying SOX has introduced an overly complex regulatory environment
Premium Corporate governance Sarbanes–Oxley Act Auditing
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is a mandatory legislation which had came into force in 2002 with the changes in regulation of corporate governance and of financial practice. There are Periodic Statutory financial reports which are to include certification that the financial statements and related information fairly prestent the financial condition and the results in all material respects information on any fraud that involves employees who are involved with internal activities. There are some requirements
Premium Corporate governance Internal control Sarbanes–Oxley Act
PUBLIC LAW 107–204—JULY 30‚ 2002 116 STAT. 745 Public Law 107–204 107th Congress An Act To protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws‚ and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled‚ SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SarbanesOxley Act of 2002’’. (b) TABLE OF
Premium Corporate governance Finance Enron
Analysis of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Dariya Gogueva Kaplan University Cost/Benefit Analysis of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act US Congress passed the Sarbanes – Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 in response to massive corporate and accounting scandals in companies such as Enron‚ WorldCom‚ and Tyco. The purpose of SOX was to improve the corporate behavior in the US‚ in order to prevent fraud and to gain investors’ trust and confidence in the market by implementing rules and restrictions. Since SOX Act has been effective
Premium Corporate governance Sarbanes–Oxley Act Enron