The Reign of Terror -Not Justified 1793 to 1794 is when the Reign of Terror began and end. The Reign of Terror was about 2 years from when Louis XVI was beheaded and around the time 20‚000 people were guillotined. 35‚000 people were killed by officers and officials. The Reign of Terror was not justified.The claim stated can be supported by these 3 reasons: they were threatened in wrong ways for the wrong things ‚ the methods used were not necessary‚ and the reasoning they gave did not match the
Premium Crime Murder Capital punishment
According to http://dictionary.com‚ revenge can be defined as “to inflict punishment for”. This definition implies that revenge is a routine‚ healthy occurrence; humanity as a whole needs revenge in order to uphold society’s general code of ethics. An example of revenge is that somebody drives a vehicle under the influence of alcohol‚ and for revenge‚ the government revokes their drivers’ license. This is not an act of vindictiveness‚ this is simply done to keep other citizens safe. By most peoples’
Premium Driving under the influence English-language films Game
Imagine a person sitting on the operation table‚ a doctor being the procedure‚ to abort their unborn child. They can hear the baby screaming and crying in pain. Would they then still support abortion? There has been a large debate over many years of the two conflicting values. The right of a woman to decide for herself whether or not she should end her pregnancy versus protecting a vulnerable human life. The biggest disagreement to stir this argument is whether or not an embryo is a human being while
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
alright to break the law‚ but whether or not it is the morally right decision depends on the individual‚ their personal experiences‚ their capability to decide between right and wrong and possibly their belief in ethical codes of conduct. A general obligation would leave you with the possibility of justifying specific breaches of the law‚ such as driving above the speed limit to get a sick friend to the hospital. This may be seen as a morally justified thing to do in that circumstance‚ however it is still
Premium Law Morality Ethics
The justified true belief theory of knowledge is an idea that if you have evidence to justify your belief then your justification makes that belief true. Your evidence holds true because of your previous experiences or your five senses thus making your idea true when you can rule out other alternative evidence. This theory is broken down into three necessary conditions: truth‚ belief and justification. Truth is the condition where it accurately represents the world; belief is when you believe something
Premium Epistemology Truth Belief
Le 1 Calvin Le Mr. Brazee World History Honors 23 October 2011 Is war ever justified? "Never think that war‚ no matter how necessary‚ nor how justified‚ is not a crime." - Ernest Hemingway. Is war ever justified? Well that depends on how much you value your freedom. When the United States entered the war in Afghanistan‚ many people criticized President Bush as if he was the responsible for the war itself. What those people don ’t see is that if we hadn ’t entered the war‚ we ’d be ducking
Premium Vietnam War Vietnam United States
INTRODUCTION Before we start to discuss the counter-terrorism strategies of European Union‚ we have to first answer the question: “What is terrorism?” or “How exactly can be terrorism defined?” When answering this question we will encounter two “problems”. Firstly‚ it is not straightforward to define this worldwide-known term because of its complexity of relating criminal‚ unlawful activities and there is no universal definition of terrorism. And secondly‚ there are as many definitions as many scholarly
Premium European Union Terrorism European Parliament
the salient features of the Australian Anti-terrorism Legislation passed in 2004. Explain. Answer: Three anti-terrorism bills were enacted in the Australian Parliament in 2004 by a Coalition government with the Labor opposition’s support. These were the Anti-terrorism bill‚ 2004‚ the Anti-terrorism bill (No 2)‚ 2004 and the Anti-terrorism bill (No 3)‚ 2004. Anti-terrorism bill‚ 2004 The Attorney-General‚ Philip Ruddock‚ introduced the Anti-terrorism bill‚ 2004 on 31 March. He described it as
Premium Terrorism
demonstration had been ludicrous.I believe that the actions of the authorities had been justified. This is because‚ the authorities and government had the fear of a communist uprising much like that of Russia in 1917‚ the potential conflict between the two sides with and against the argument‚ and the strikers had been causing many cases of property damage. Firstly‚ the reason the actions of the authorities had been indeed justified‚ is due to the fear of a communist revolution much like that of Russia’s in
Premium Soviet Union Russia Communism
Effects of Terrorism to a Country Terrorism affects a country in many ways. They affect the economy and the population living in that country. Economical effect Financial Market There is no doubt among economists that wars‚ terrorism and political instability have a significant negative effects on the economies in which they take place. Recent economic literature investigates both the consequences of political violence and the mechanisms that transform this violence into economic damage. The
Premium September 11 attacks World Trade Center