1. Article 2 of the UCC mandates that the parties to a sales contract state in specific and unambiguous language the exact terms of the contract. Otherwise‚ courts will declare the contract unenforceable. True False 2. Law of sale of goods codified in the Art.2 of the UCC is modified to accommodate current practices of the merchants. True False 3. In mixed goods-services situations‚ courts determine whether the contract is for the sale of goods by determining whether the good or
Premium Contract
The Psychological Contract Shein (1980) explained the concept of the psychological contract as a set of mutual expectations held between the employee and employer within the workplace. It is an unwritten set of expectations operating at all times. It can also be described as individual beliefs shaped by the organisation that relates to the expectation the employee has in terms of pay‚ fair treatment‚ opportunities etc and the expectations that the employer has in terms of performance‚ loyalty‚ etc
Premium Employment
elements she will need to prove that she is not guilty is Duty‚ Breach‚ Cause‚ and Harm In this case‚ Patty who would be consider the plaintiff owes the defendant (security guard) nothing at all. She did what any other normal person would do‚ which was leave the store in a hurry due to the fact she had someone important to be. The second tort claim would be breach. A breach is a violation of a law or duty. The defendant must breach his duty to be liable for negligence. In this Patty
Premium Law Tort Negligence
Employee Resourcing – The Psychological Contract How can we define the psychological contract? Is it the set of mutual obligations/expectations and more often than not aspirations between employer and employee that extend beyond the formal‚ written contract of employment? This is the general consensus with modern scholars and workers alike‚ but just how far is this assertion true? The problem is trying to evaluate what the psychological contract actually is and what it stands for in our
Free Employment
Contracts Contracts are an important part of everyday life. They are an essential part of business. As a student of a business law class‚ I will discuss in this paper several aspects of contracts. This paper will give a definition of a contract and the essential elements necessary to form a valid contract. It will briefly discuss breach of contract and the difference between a material breach and a nonmaterial breach of contract. Examples of legal and equitable remedies available for breach
Premium Contract Breach of contract Damages
This contract‚ entered into on the ____ of _________‚ 2012‚ is for the professional recording of ‘Projects’ represented by Samantha (client) for the recording session described below. The undersigned employer (S.N.E.) and the undersigned client agree on the contract as follows: Client agrees to be personally and individually liable for the terms of this contract. S.N.E hereby engages and employs musicians for exclusive personal services‚ providing them with a wide range
Premium Recording Contract Media technology
Contract Law Introduction In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not‚ were they were obliged to re-tender the contract
Premium Contract
Recitals: (A) After the Closing‚ Aviation intends to enter into a one year contract with Roundhead Industries Corp. (“Roundhead”) to provide charter services for its executives. Aviation cannot enter the contract with Roundhead until the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement as Roundhead will not enter the contract until Aviation has full ownership of the Aircraft. The offer to enter the contract will expire on January 13‚ 2012 at 5:00 pm ET.1 Accordingly the parties agree:
Premium Corporation Sales Asset
WRITTEN CONTRACTS 1 Written Contracts Javier Garza Grantham University WRITTEN CONTRACTS 2 Written Contracts Paula orally agrees to work with Next Corporation in New York City for two years. Paula moves her family and begins work. Three months later‚ Paula is fired for no stated cause. She sues for reinstatement or pay. Next Corporation argues that there is no written contract between them. What will the court say? Oral contracts are as
Premium Contract Contract law Gentlemen's agreement
A stranger to a contract can’t sue…!!!! Submitted by:- Ankit Bhardwaj 091004 M.B.A. III sem. The basic answer to this question is ‘NO’‚ as the following literature supports and explains this fact effectively. A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates an obligation to do or not to do something. The parties
Premium Common law Contract law Law