constraints. If the CEC rejects a proposal there are large financial and emotional sunk costs‚ due to the long development process. Each project is evaluated in terms of its quantitative‚ qualitative‚ and strategic parameters. In calculating the NPV of these projects‚ Target uses two hurdle rates‚ 9% and 4% for the store operations and credit-card cash flows respectively‚ due to the different costs of capital. Funding credit card receivables requires less risk than funding store operations because
Premium Wal-Mart Target Corporation Hypermarket
Development of E.ON in oil and gas sector Dr. Maxim Stein-Khokhlov‚ E.ON E&P Upstream Lectures Course Moscow‚ October 2013 Agenda E&P within E.ON Group - Overview Our business portfolio Adding value with innovative technology E&P Engagement in Russia Conclusion and Outlook E.ON – Power and Gas Active in Europe‚ Russia‚ Americas and North Africa More than 70‚000 employees Over €130 billion in sales and ca. €10‚8 EBITDA in 2012 Our objective is to make energy cleaner
Premium Net present value Joint venture Natural gas
and analyzing NPV‚ payback‚ IRR‚ and MIRR for each alternative. Analysis indicates that developing the technologies is more optimal as it outperforms the alternative in all measures. Among all measurements‚ we believe NPV to be the most effective. The details of our analysis are documented below. NPV (Net Present Value) measures the expected change in wealth from undertaking the project. The NPV of purchasing is $60.34 million and $93.23 million for developing the technologies. NPV is the most
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
investment’s payback period‚ IRR‚ and NPV‚ assuming the firm’s WACC is 10%. b) If the firm requires a payback period of less than 5 years‚ should this project be accepted? Answer: Yes it should accept the project because the payback period for the project meets the less than five years requirement with 4.13 years. c) Based on the IRR and NPV rules‚ should this project be accepted? Be sure to justify your choice. Answer: Yes the project should be accepted based on the IRR of 13% the company
Premium Net present value
Applied Corporate Finance Case: American Chemical Corporation The primary issue we are exploring here is the planned sale of the Collinsville Plant by American Chemical Corporation to Dixon at a negotiated price of $ 12 Million (as of end of year ‘79) Q1: Estimate the appropriate cost of capital for the investment To calculate the appropriate cost of capital we assessed Dixon’s purchase investment structure. The steps were as follows: 1. We first calculated the cost of debt of the investment using
Premium Net present value Free cash flow
Capital Budgeting Case Learning Team A QRB/501 Quantitative Reasoning for Business July 29‚ 2014 Dr. Larry Olanrewaju Capital Budgeting Case Our Company has the opportunity to obtain another corporation. We have to choose between two companies‚ Company A or Company B. We only have $250‚000 to spend to purchase the companies. Because of this financial constraint‚ acquiring both corporations is not an option. Therefore‚ we must determine what company would be better to acquire. Company A Company
Premium Finance Investment Economics
the above formula‚ A is the last period with a negative cumulative cash flow; B is the absolute value of cumulative cash flow at the end of the period A; C is the total cash flow during the period after A Net Present Value: Net present value (NPV) is used to
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
Introduction to Standard Costing Standard costing is an important subtopic of cost accounting. Standard costs are usually associated with a manufacturing company’s costs of direct material‚ direct labor‚ and manufacturing overhead. Rather than assigning the actual costs of direct material‚ direct labor‚ and manufacturing overhead to a product‚ many manufacturers assign the expected or standard cost. This means that a manufacturer’s inventories and cost of goods sold will begin with amounts reflecting
Premium Net present value Rate of return Time value of money
the NPV and IRR for the above two projects‚ assuming a 13% required rate of return. b. Discuss the ranking conflict. c. What decision should be made regarding these two projects? Answer: a. NPV of A = $211‚305 NPV of B = $401‚592.64 IRR of A = 16.33% IRR of B = 15.99% b. The later cash flow of B causes its lower IRR even though it has the higher NPV. c. B should be accepted because it is the mutually exclusive project with the highest positive NPV. Keywords: NPV‚ IRR
Premium Internal rate of return Net present value Rate of return
company. Finally‚ based on these assumptions‚ the NPV of the project would be: 1228‚485 2. What is the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of this project? The internal rate of return is the rate that would make the net present value of the firm’s project equal to zero. In other words‚ the IRR is the rate that would make the decision of investing or not in this project indifferent for the company. In order to calculate the IRR we started by computing the Free Cash Flows (FCF) for every
Premium Net present value Cash flow Internal rate of return