COMPANY V JR CROMPTON & BROS LTD (agreed to be bound by principle) “Agreement”: offer & acceptance Offers: Firm promise‚ properly communicated‚ can be revoked BEFORE acceptance Offer can be directed to: one person‚ whole group or world- CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO (showed sincerity to matter because of £1000) Counter offer- REJECTS original- HYDE V WRENCH NOT OFFERS- Invitation to treat: offer to consider offer PHAMACEUTRICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN V BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS (SOUTHERN) LTD
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
1.Offer 1. Offer means a proposal by a person in which he makes his willingness to enter into a legally binding contract for some conside¬ration. 2. An offer is made with the object of getting consent of the offeree. 3. An offer can be accepted by the offeree. 4. An offer when accepted becomes an agreement. Invitation to Offer 1. An Invitation to offer means an intention of a person to invite others with a view to enter into an agreement. 2. An invitation to offer on the other hand is made
Premium Contract
General Introduction For parties to be bound by an agreement‚ it must first be determined if a prima facie valid and enforceable contract exists. A contract can be defined as an agreement containing promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and obligations and enforceable in a court of law [1]. For a legally binding contract to exist the following elements must be satisfied: 1. An offer must exist 2. The offer must be accepted
Premium Contract
1. The creation of a binding contract that the courts will enforce requires the contracting parties to meet a number of requirements that are prescribed by the law of contract. While these requirements are not numerous‚ they must‚ nevertheless‚ be met before the agreement creates rights and duties that may be enforceable at law. These requirements are referred to as the elements of a valid contract and consist of the following: a. An intention to create a legal relationship – Though the Contracts
Premium Contract Common law
4 main elements of a contract‚ and a contract will not be valid without these. The assignment will provide detailed information using case laws and a report around the main elements of a contract. These case laws will include: * Carlill vs Carbolic Smoke Ball Company * Pharmeceutical Society of Great Britain vs Boots Cash Chemists * Fisher vs Bell * Partridge vs Crittenden * Entores Ltd vs Miles Far East Corporation * Felthouse vs Bindley * Dickinson vs Dodds * Byrne
Premium Contract
Business Law Lecture 1: Separation of powers: Sources of Law: Common Law judge made law / case law Statutory Law Parliament Parliament: Government Parliament Bi-cameral < State Parliament Government Parliament Upper = Senate Lower = House of Reps State Parliament Upper = Legislative Council Lower = Legislative Assembly Interpretation Of Law: 1. Literal approach (gives literal interpretation to statute’s words) 2. Golden Rule (avoids interpretations that cause absurdities)
Premium Contract
Quality of Dairy Products Judging Grading and Standardizing Booklet No. 278 Dairy Management & Milk Products: DMMPS - 8 Contents Preface I. Introduction II. Milk Grades III. Fundamental Rules for Judging Milk IV. Detection of Adulteration in Milk V. Detection of Water in Milk VI. Detection of Adulteration in Ghee VII. Off-Flavours in Milk VIII. Quality Control Tests IX. Bacteriological Tests X. Standards of Dairy Products XI. PFA Standards for Milk Products Preface
Premium Milk
THE LAW OF CONTRACT IN GHANA (These notes have mainly been culled from Mrs. Christine Dowuona Hammond’s seminal work on the Law of Contracts.) INTRODUCTION Contracts are made by people every day‚ whether the parties recognise it or not. Each time one spends money on anything – a bus ticket‚ an airline ticket‚ a pair of shoes‚ a meal in a restaurant‚ laundry services‚ books‚ or signs a lease‚ etc. one concludes a valid and legally binding contract. Contracts may be oral or written;
Premium Contract
Punishment Punishment (also known as discipline or penalty) is the authoritative imposition of something undesirable or unpleasant on‚ or the removal of something desirable or pleasant from‚ a person‚ animal‚ organization or entity in response to behavior deemed unacceptable by an individual‚ group or other entity.[1][2][3][4][5] The authority may be either a group or a single person‚ and punishment may be carried out formally under a system of law or informally in other kinds of social settings
Premium Law Common law
Q&A 2 Certainty of terms and intention Introduction Contractual certainty If businessmen are often not overly-concerned with the niceties of offer and acceptance it follows that their contracts may not be all-embracing and complete in every respect. The parties may have reached an agreement in principle and then prefer to rely on experience from previous dealings‚ business practice and goodwill. The law’s overall policy is to uphold bargains wherever possible and although businessmen tend to
Premium Contract