Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century: Threat of Entry:low 1. Economies of scale - High production volume but merit not clear (1st paragraph on page 2) 2. Product differentiation - Brand identification (high advertising expense‚ Exhibit 2) 3. Capital requirements - CPs: little capital investment (1st paragraph on page 2) - Bottlers: capital intensive (2nd paragraph on page 3) 4. Cost disadvantages independent of size - No 5. Access to distribution channels - Food stores (35%): intense
Premium Coca-Cola Brand Logo
Case Study 16: Coke and Pepsi 1. Identify the ongoing issues in this case with respect to issues management‚ crisis management‚ global business ethics‚ and stakeholder management. Rank order these in terms of their priorities for Coca-Cola and for PepsiCo. Number 1 Priority: The major global business ethics I found in this case study was the whole issue with excessive water usage in their companies as well as the pollution of the water. The book explains that water is very sacred in India. Even
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
Issue/Problem Identification This case study shows the difficulties multinational corporations face when doing business in developing countries. Although Coke and Pepsi were prompt at addressing the accusations brought against them‚ they overlooked multiple issues when starting business in India. When starting a business in a foreign country‚ the first priority a company should have is to learn the native culture. This was Coke and Pepsi’s biggest mistake and was most likely the reason why the
Premium Water Water resources Freshwater
Pepsi is a manufacturer or use manufacturers‚ market and sell a variety of salty‚ sweet and grain-based snacks‚ carbonated and non-carbonated beverages‚ and foods through their North American and international divisions. B) Coca-Cola has the dominant position in beverage sales. C) Coca-Cola 2006 $29‚963‚ 2007 $43‚269 The difference is $13‚306 for a 44.4% increase. Pepsi 2006 $29‚930‚ 2007‚ $34‚628 The difference is $4‚698 for a 15.6% increase. D) Pepsi had
Premium Revenue Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
standardised markets rather than many customised markets.” Theodre Levitt[1] Introduction Companies may enter overseas markets for various reasons. These include saturated and intensely competitive domestic markets‚ diversification of risk on a geographical basis‚ opportunity to realise economies of scale and scope‚ entry of competitors into overseas markets‚ the need to follow customers going abroad and the desire to compete and learn in a market with sophisticated consumer tastes. This chapter focuses
Premium Marketing Marketing research Joint venture
CASE 13 Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India THE BEVERAGE BATTLEFIELD In 2007‚ the President and CEO of Coca-Cola asserted that Coke has had a rather rough run in India; but now it seems to be getting its positioning right. Similarly‚ PepsiCo’s Asia chief asserted that India is the beverage battlefield for this decade and beyond. Even though the government had opened its doors wide to foreign companies‚ the experience of the world’s two giant soft drinks companies in India during the 1990s
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
of market share and dominating volumes are key issue of this article. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. Which are the strategies those helped these major players to become successful in India. Both these major giants entered India around 1992.Both giants entered with new entity name as Hindustan Coca Cola and PepsiCo as Aradhana Beverages . Diminishing strategy adopted by both player is to diminish threats from substitute products and services . This
Premium Coca-Cola Marketing Pepsi
percentage. The appearance‚ smell and taste of the production are suspended and the correcting measures are taken also as to sent right the bottling process. The main objective of the study is to find out the strength and weakness of the Pepsi in visakhapatnam zone when compared to the Coca-cola‚ that is mainly in the three places in Srikakulam district i.e. Srikakulam‚ Narasannapeta‚ and Amadalavalasa .Consulting almost all the outlets in these three areas‚ which are selling the soft drinks
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Soft drink
Case 23: Coke and Pepsi in India: Issues‚ Ethics‚ and Crisis Management In APA style Table of Contents Chapter Page 1. Abstract 3 2. Introduction 4 3. Issue Management 5 4. Crisis Management 7 5. Global Business Ethics 10 6. Stakeholder Management 13 7. Corporate Social Responsibility 14 1. Economic Responsibilities
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Pepsi
Coke has been leading the competition from 1998-2002 in terms of higher market capitalization‚ gross margin and net income. However‚ Pepsi was leading the fight in terms of growth in revenue and net income. However‚ Pepsi’s stock performed 45% better than Coke’s stock. Overall‚ Pepsi was a smaller company but it was growing faster than Coke. Coke had a strong foundation‚ however‚ their revenue during this period increased due to summer months artificially increasing the demand. Pepsi‚ on the other
Premium Coca-Cola Cola