demanded the faith‚ strength‚ and determination to please God. The Puritan Dilemma‚ by Edmund S. Morgan‚ is the biography of John Winthrop‚ a Puritan who departs from England in order to create a haven and an example of a community where the laws of God were followed diligently. As a man with power and as a Puritan‚ Winthrop must face difficult decisions and at the same time make sure they are justified by God. The dilemmas‚ specifically paradoxes‚ which Puritans encountered in everyday life‚ were
Free Puritan Massachusetts John Winthrop
Relativism and Morality Na’Quisha Powell SOC 120 Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility Instructor: Erin Schouten March 25‚ 2013 There are moral choices made on a daily basis‚ no matter the culture or race‚ people make these types of choices. The moral choices we make based on our cultures can be viewed on a scale of right and wrong by other cultures. In the writing of “Some Moral Minima”‚ Lenn E. Goodman views several aspects of morality and relativism‚ and argues that certain
Premium Rape Violence Child sexual abuse
based on their moral codes. Ethics determine what is right‚ and what is wrong for an individual. However‚ we have adopted a sense of cultural relativism in that we don’t always feel the “right” thing is the ethical thing to do. Dr. Edward Younkins‚ Professor of Accountancy and Business Administration at Wheeling Jesuit University‚ states that this form of cultural relativism comes from‚ “...the mistaken idea that there are no objective
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
makes addiction irrelevant. If such treatment hastens the death of the patient‚ but this was an unintended consequence of the intent to relieve suffering‚ then the act may be morally permissible (Jochemsen‚ 1996). This principle applies to the case of Mr. M. As stated earlier‚ neither the patient nor his physicians intended his death. They did‚ however‚ intend to relieve him from a burdensome and futile treatment; his death was an unintended consequence. According to the principle of double effect
Premium Death Medical terms Medicine
In Support of Moral Relativism: My topic is on moral relativism‚ and I am trying to argue that moral relativism is applicable and is required to explain the current phenomenon. First I would try to show how culture affects moral decisions‚ and that such shows the need for a relativistic explanation. I would propose a few arguments and analogies for the need of relativism‚ such as that in different situations the same moral rule may not apply. I would then try to see if there are any moral standards
Free Morality
In A Defense of Moral Relativism‚ Ruth Benedict argues that normal behavior varies from society to society; therefore‚ what’s morally right for one society can be morally wrong for another. To support this argument‚ Benedict mentions how certain cultures practice what’s “abnormal” to us without any difficulty. She goes further to give examples of traits that are abnormal to us such as‚ “sadism or delusions grandeur or of persecution” (Benedict‚ 1934‚ p.1) and concludes saying that “these abnormal
Premium Morality Ethics Cultural relativism
the majority? Do the good consequences outweigh the bad ones? For Bentham‚ one must ought to choose and idea or action that would‚ at the end‚ bring the greater happiness for the majority of the people. We are obliged to opt for such action. In this case‚ the utility has translated into greater happiness for a greater number of
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Jeremy Bentham
Gavin Tyler Poem Analysis In the poem; "The Wisdom of Shelley" by George Elliot Clarke there is much imagery and symbolism used throughout the entire work. The author very rapidly sets the tone of the poem‚ as well as gives the reader hints of past major events in “Shelley’s” life. Immediately the mood of negativity is created. Everything that is presented to her is received by her in a different light. There is strong imagery based on the contrast. The author draws a picture in the reader’s mind
Premium Love Symbol Academy Award for Best Actress
Assess Rachels’ critique of the main argument for normative cultural relativism (NCR)‚ i.e.‚ the Cultural Differences Argument. How might a proponent of NCR respond to Rachels critique? Is the response effective? Why or why not? In this essay‚ I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”‚ in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes‚ thus there is no single
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Culture
Ethical Relativism; No moral truths‚ just relative to the individual/culture. When is different just different and when is it morally problematic? Diversity of standards often leads to issues with regards to; Corruption/work practices/child labour/inferior products/government influence Situation sensitive: need for tolerance/understanding of variety of cultures. Moral diversity: no wrongs/rights‚ based purely on social norms. Shouldn’t pass judgement on situations
Premium Developed country Human Development Index Country classifications