CASE STUDY 1 SEC ENFORCEMENT RELEASE- BRISTOL-MYERS 1. Access the SEC website‚ www.sec.gov‚ and do the following: -go to “Information for Accountants” -go to “The Division of Enforcement Chief Accountants Office” -go to “Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases” - then go to the enforcement release related to Bristol-Myers dated August 4‚ 2004. 2. What were the broad areas which the SEC addressed? 3. Of these issues‚ which one was by far the most significant in terms of dollars involved
Premium Revenue
Cracking the Case Case Interview Training Strategy and Operations October 3‚ 2005 ©2005 Deloitte Inc. Case Interview Training Agenda Objectives What is consulting? Who is Deloitte? Case Interview Preparation What is a case interview and what do companies expect? How do you approach a case? Example case Practice Additional Information 2 Objectives By the end of this session you should: Understand what a career in consulting has to offer Know how Deloitte is positioned in the consulting
Premium Management consulting Strategic management
THE CASE 2008 | FULL VERSION CBS Case Competition Copyright © 2008 CBS Case Competiton www.casecompetition.com Thank you On behalf of CBS Case Competition 2008 the case writers wish to thank Bang & Olufsen A/S Interviews Alberto de Lucio‚ Head of Bang & Olufsen Southern Europe‚ B&O Carsten Sander‚ Senior Director Scandinavia and Baltic‚ B&O Flemming Møller Pedersen‚ Senior Director‚ Idea Factory‚ B&O Flemming Nielsen‚ Sales Director‚ Enterprise‚ B&O Henrik Messel‚ Senior Director‚
Premium Vermiform appendix Euro
I. Case Introduction Before Chrysler merged to become DaimlerChrysler AG‚ they were presented with a takeover bid of $55 per share by MGM billionaire Kirk Kerkorian and former Chrysler chairman Lee Iacocca. Kirk Kerkorian was a stockholder in Chrysler and an experienced takeover financier who apparently found Chrysler to be a good buy. Chrysler rejected the offer‚ however‚ stating that the firm was not for sale. Further‚ many Wall Street experts felt that Kerkorian could not come
Premium Financial ratios Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Financial ratio
1986 (12) 4 3 7 1987 (17) 5 5 1988 (17) 5 5 1989 80 (24) (24) 1990 85 (26) (26) 1991 92 (28) (28) 1992 93 (28) (28) 1993 94 (29) (29) $m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m % $m $m $m $m x x x 1983 15‚8% 303 109 40 452 12‚6 6‚4 9‚5 1984 36 (71) (35) 12 71 (19) (3) 25 1985 71 (108) (37) 14 108 (31) (4) 50 1986 100 (112) (12) 7 112 (42) (4) 61 1987 99 (116) (17) 5 116 (10) 94 Price to pay IRR/WACC (x) IRR/WACC (x) 1988 101 (118) (17) 5 118 (10) 96 1989 101 (21) 80 (24) 21 (8) 68 1990 101 (16) 85 (26) 16 (6) 69 1991 101
Premium
has huge competition because the soda market is so homogeneous ÿ There need to be enough resource for heavy advertising expenses ÿ Unplanned soft drink purchases other that Crush. Market v Primary target market for Crush is young adults (18-24) drinking soft drinks. Secondary target market for Crush is
Premium Soft drink
Contract-Law-page CASES ON FORMATION OF A CONTRACT OFFER Payne v Cave (1789) The defendant made the highest bid for the plaintiff’s goods at an auction sale‚ but he withdrew his bid before the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer. It was held that the defendant was not bound to purchase the goods. His bid amounted to an offer which he was entitled to withdraw at any time before the auctioneer signified acceptance by knocking down the hammer. Note: The common law rule laid down in this case has now been
Premium Contract
Service Enterprise IE-497B Dr. A.Ravindran October 5‚ 2007 Case Study #2 (Clean Sweep‚ Inc.) Made by: Moises Eidelman 1 Question #1) Plot the Run Charts for (a) total number of complaints and (b) complaints for each crew. Part (a) Table 1 Total number of complaints per month month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # complaints 35 31 24 21 16 14 8 15 14 Figure 1 Run chart for total number of complaints 2 Part (b) Table 2 Total number of monthly complaints per crew month
Premium Chart Control chart Bar chart
www.sciedu.ca/rwe Research in World Economy Vol. 3‚ No. 1; March 2012 Globalization and Economic Growth: A Case Study in A Few Developing Countries (1980-2010) Abdolmajid Arfaei Moghaddam (Corresponding author) Department of Civilization and Government Studies‚ Faculty of Human Ecology‚ University Putra Malaysia‚ Tel: +603-894-67058 E-mail: marfaeim@hotmail.com Ma’rof Redzuan Department of Social and Development Science‚ Faculty of Human Ecology‚ University Putra Malaysia‚
Premium Economic growth International trade Economics
1. Write a brief summary of the case and key problems (10 points) The case is about the process fruit operations of a receiving plant 1(RP1) at National Cranberry Cooperative (NCC). The NCC was an organization formed and owned by growers of cranberries to sell and market their products. The farmers bring their cranberries to the cooperative directly from their farms in leased trucks and get returns for their product from the cooperative. Over the years a trend was witnessed‚ the share of water harvested
Premium Time Term Bottleneck