CASE CONTEXT Rendell Company is experiencing some difficulties in implementing its modern control techniques due to the irking relationship between the divisional controller and the corporate controller. This is mainly because the loyalty of the divisional controllers rest with the divisional managers. Because of this current set-up‚ Mr Bevins believes that information regarding the divisions’ performance are not reported accurately and biased. .Mr. Bevins is interested if applying a control organization
Premium Control theory Management Control engineering
RENDELL COMPANY CASE Case Overview Rendell Company is a company which had already involved in business almost 50 years and always produces profit. The company has seven operating divisions. Each division has general manager and Division Controller. The Division General Manager is responsible for reporting the division achievement to Corporate Controller. Division Controller has obligation to make report to Division General Manager regarding budget and performance reports. Corporate Controller
Premium Corporate governance Corporation
suits Rendell Company plus some additional control system in attaining the company’s main objectives. We will be also tackling the roles‚ functions and responsibilities of a controller in an organization. This case takes us into Rendell Company which is currently having problems between the corporate controller and the divisional controller. We assessed the advantages and disadvantages of the organization structure of Martex whether it can be applied and be implemented to Rendell Company in order
Premium Control theory Management Control
MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM – RENDELL CASE I. Case Summary This case rises from Fred Bevin concern about the organizational status of his divisional controller. This concern occurred because Mr. Bevins foresaw increasing difficulties with the relationship between the corporate controller and the divisional controllers as the company introduced more modern control techniques. The existing relationship hampered him to could urge the development and use of new technique rapidly. His interest in the controller
Premium Control theory Management PID controller
Chapter 3 Behauior in Organizations 111 Cmn 3-1 Rervonr-r- Coir‚rpawy Fred Bevins‚ controller of the Rendeli Company‚ was concerned about the organizational status of his divisional controllers. In 1985 and for many years previously‚ the divisional controllers reported to the general managers of their divisions. Although Mr. Bevins knew this to be the general practice in many other divisionally organized companies‚ he was not entirely satisfied with it. His interest in making a change
Premium Management
1‚ what is the organizational philosophy of Martex with respect to the controller function? What do you think of it? Should Rendell adopt this philosophy? Answer: The organizational philosophy of Martex with respect to the controller function is that divisional controller directly report to the corporate controller for transparency of information on budget issues. Let’s discuss some strengths and weaknesses about Martex philosophy as following: Strengths: -Divisional controller is empowered
Premium Organizational studies Organizational culture
SYSTEMS “Case Analysis: Rendell Company” Prepared by: Martinus Anggi Apriliawan 64-Int-A MASTER OF MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA 2015 Rendell Company Summary by: Martinus Anggi Apriliawan 64-Int-A 1. Introduction Fred Bevins is the controller of the Rendell Company‚ a firm that has been profitable for 50 years‚ but has concerned over its organizational status of his divisional controllers that possibly affected the growth rate of the company to decline
Premium Management Business Control
1. There are many examples of successful companies. To what extent is 3M justifiably highlighted as the ‘innovating machine’? I feel 3M is justifiably highlighted as the ‘innovating machine’ and should be proud to be referred to as this. “For years‚ people around the world have looked to 3M for products and ideas that solve problems and make their lives easier and better. Our achievements are the foundation of a proud past and the bright future of many innovations to come.” (3M‚ para1) I think
Premium Innovation Creativity Idea
Case Analysis: Tucker Company In partial fulfilment of the requirements in MGT101: Victorio‚ Judith Merari B. Rubiano‚ Ferrando L. Regondola‚ Joyce Hanna R. Malazarte‚ Virgilio II‚ B. Castillo‚ Aaron T. Carandang‚ Loise Ann M. August 29‚ 2012 I. POINT OF VIEW This case analysis takes the point of view of Mr. Harnett‚ the president of Tucker Company. Being the top manager‚ he is the one responsible for overseeing the current status and developments of the company. Moreover‚ he is the one in-charge
Premium Vice President of the United States Organizational structure President of the United States
Case 3: Ben & Jerry’s 1) Ben & Jerry’s has not been successful in fulfilling all three elements of its mission statement. Ben & Jerry’s has been successful in the element of “Product”; they have continued to make‚ distribute‚ and sell the finest quality super premium ice cream in a wide variety of flavors. Ben & Jerry’s has also been successful in the element of “Social”. Since 1985 Ben & Jerry’s has donated 7.5% of its pretax earnings to various social foundations and
Premium Stock market Financial ratio P/E ratio