READER’S DIGEST CASE ANALYSIS By Bobby Renner March 6‚ 2013 Overview: This case analysis is about Readers Digest’s recent struggle to succeed in business. Reader’s digest was the number one consumer of magazines in the US and has struggle in the passed decade after the invention of Internet. They have recently hired a new CEO Mary Burner to help restructure RDA. Issues: * INTERNET- The internet is RDA’s biggest competitor. It offers information of all kinds free of charge to everyone
Premium Customer service Customer Balance sheet
thinking and redefining how business is done.” Technology has greatly improved the buyers’ awareness and individuals can retrieve information on the Internet effortlessly at low marginal cost nowadays. With the enhanced information flow‚ the buyers are more well-informed and knowledgeable than ever‚ hence they are more able to bargain over prices and products more effectively. The power of the buyers are high as they will be more empowered to exert additional pressure on Reader’s Digest to publish interesting
Premium Demographics Baby boomer Paper
CASE DIGESTS: 1. ALCANTARA vs. ALCANTARA FACTS: On Dec. 8‚ 1982‚ petitioner Restituto Alcantara and respondent Rosita Alcantara‚ without securing the required marriage license‚ went to Manila City Hall for the purpose of marriage. They met a “fixer” and arranged everything for them. A Rev. Aquilino Navarro‚ a Minister of Gospel of the CDCC Chapel solemnized their wedding. The petitioner and respondent went through another marriage ceremony on March 16‚ 1983. The marriage was likewise celebrated
Premium Marriage Wedding
account‚ and no objection was made * 4 months after the check was charged‚ it developed that Lazaro Melicor‚ to whom the check was made payable‚ had never received it‚ and that his signature‚ as an endorser‚ was forged by Maasim‚ * Eastern promptly made a demand upon the HSBC to credit the amount of the forged check * Eastern filed against HSBC and PNB * RTC: dismissed the case Issue: Whether the Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) and Philippine National Bank (PNB)‚ defendants
Premium Bank Supreme Court of the United States Credit card
Constitutional Law Case Digest People vs. Perfecto Facts: Perfecto was convicted by the municipal trial court as editor of La Nacion for publishing libelous statement pursuant to Article 256 of Spanish Penal Code. Issue: whether article 256 of the Spanish Penal Code‚ punishing "Any person who‚ by . . . writing‚ shall defame‚ abuse‚ or insult any Minister of the Crown or other person in authority . . .‚" is still in force. Ruling: 1. Effect of the Philippine Libel Law‚ Act No. 277‚ on article
Premium Ferdinand Marcos
Calvo v. UCPB General Insurance Case Digest Calvo v. UCPB General Insurance G.R. No. 148496 March 19‚ 2002 Facts: Petitioner Virgines Calvo‚ owner of Transorient Container Terminal Services‚ Inc. (TCTSI)‚ and a custom broker‚ entered into a contract with San Miguel Corporation (SMC) for the transfer of 114 reels of semi-chemical fluting paper and 124 reels of kraft liner board from the port area to the Tabacalera Compound‚ Ermita‚ Manila. The cargo was insured by respondent UCPB General Insurance
Premium Insurance
ASUNZA‚ Charles Darvin S. 4LM RESTATE THE FOLLOWING: 1. ARTICLE 279 No less than the Constitution recognizes and guarantees the labor’s right to security of tenure. Under the Labor Code of the Philippines‚ as amended‚ specifically‚ Article 279 of the said Code‚ the security of tenure has been construed to mean as that “the employer shall not terminate the services of an employee except for a just cause or when authorized” by the Code. The two facets of this legal provision are: (a) the
Premium Employment
CASE DIGEST CASE #1: Kuroda v. Jalandoni 83 Phil 171 • FACTS: - Shigenori Kuroda‚ former Lieutenant-General of the Japanese Imperial Forces of the Philippines‚ was charged before a Military Commission in violation of the laws and customs of war. The Petitioner seeks to establish the illegality of Executive Order No. 68 of the President of the Philippines; to enjoin and prohibit two US prosecutors from participating in the prosecution of the petitioner’s case; and to permanently
Premium Law Human rights United States Constitution
1. Ladera v. Hodges G.R. No. 8027-R‚ September 23‚ 1952‚ Vol. 48‚ No. 12‚ Official Gazette 5374Reyes‚J.B.L.‚ J. FACTS: Paz G. Ladera entered into a contract with C.N. Hodges. Hodges promised to sell a lot with an area of 278square meters to Ladera‚ subject to certain terms and conditions. The agreement called for a downpayment of P 800.00 and monthly installments of P 5.00 each with interest of 1% per month‚ until P2‚085 is paid in full. Incase of failure of the purchaser to make any monthly
Premium Real property Property Personal property
(1) G.R. No. 169144 IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION TO APPROVE THE WILL OF RUPERTA PALAGANAS WITH PRAYER FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR‚ MANUEL MIGUEL PALAGANAS and BENJAMIN GREGORIO PALAGANAS‚ petitioners‚ vs. ERNESTO PALAGANAS‚ respondent. January 26‚ 2011 ABAD‚ J.: FACTS: Ruperta C. Palaganas (Ruperta)‚ a Filipino who became a naturalized United States (U.S.) citizen in 2001‚ died single and childless. In the last will and testament she executed in California‚ she designated
Premium Estate Inheritance Legal terms