and association with Handy Andy’s product (the trash compactors) b. Why is this not a customer service problem? It is not a customer service problem because this is service associated with the distributors. The distributors are not in house. They are not part of the organization. Therefore poor customer reviews and on the service should be handled by the distributors and not Handy Andy. c. This is definitely a customer service problem. Even though it is not Handy Andy directly at fault.
Premium Customer service Sales Customer
Individual Assignment 2: Handy Andy‚ Inc. By Jon Ezell 1. Yes; this problem has a negative impact on the customer. Customers who purchased a compactor from Handy Andy were shown to receive improper customer service by the factory distributors. This poor customer service manifested itself in the form of longer delivery times‚ as well as leaving the compactor in the middle of a customer’s kitchen without giving the proper operating instructions to the customer. Ortega also discovered that the factory
Premium Customer service Customer Marketing
1. Is this a customer service problem? Why or why not? Yes; this problem has a negative impact on the customer. Customers who purchased a compactor from Handy Andy were shown to receive improper customer service by the factory distributors. This poor customer service manifested itself in the form of longer delivery times‚ as well as leaving the compactor in the middle of a customer’s kitchen without giving the proper operating instructions to the customer. Ortega also discovered that the factory
Premium Customer service Sales Customer
Names: Carlos Murillo‚ Xavier Villegas‚ Zabeth Chedraui‚ Paula Ruiz‚ Solange Guaman Case 7-1 Handy Andy Inc Is this a customer service problem? Why or why not? No‚ because the case did not mention that costumers were unsatisfied‚ in fact it says that few defects had been reported and most of the times the deliveries were fast enough‚ also that the installing compactors process was done efficiently. Marketing channels are the arrangement of intermediaries (wholesalers‚ retailers‚ and
Premium Customer Andy Warhol Handy Andy
Kaitlin Tolley MGT 331 Case 4: MagRec Inc. 1. If I were the manager I would have pushed for a more moral‚ honest solution to the problem with Partco. The company should have owned up to the poor quality parts and offer to fix any damaged parts for customers. Even though it would have cost the company time and money‚ it was the right thing to do. I think that if the company were to explain the situation to Partco- with the one bad batch of parts‚ and assured them that it wouldn’t happen again and
Premium Cognition Cognitive dissonance Social psychology
Case 4: MAGREC‚ Inc. 1.) Place yourself in the role of the manager. What should you do now? After considering what happened‚ would you change any of your behaviors? If I was Pat: Even though Fred wants me to fire Dinah‚ I believe that if I was to fire her‚ Dinah would file a lawsuit for wrongful discharge. My values and morals should not be the deciding factor in determining if Dinah’s actions are grounds for dismal. As such‚ I would meet with Fred‚ and explain to him the result
Premium Cognitive dissonance Cognition Cognitive bias
1. Activity Based Costing benefits businesses that are more complex in nature. In this case‚ Greetings. INC has added a new product line‚ Wall Decor‚ which permits them to grow without expanding their physical stores; however‚ they have significantly raised their overhead costs by multiplying their cost drivers. Not to mention the fact that they have incorporated a largely automated system into their product line‚ which we know calls for an ABC system. The main reason to move to ABC though‚ would
Premium Costs Activity-based costing Cost driver
Case 4: Distortions Caused By Inappropriate Allocation Base Chocolate Bars‚ Inc. Case Background. Chocolate Bars‚ inc. (CBI) manufactures chocolate candy bars with three variants – Almond Dream‚ Krispy Krackle‚ and Creamy Crunch. There are 2 distinct production processes for each product of CBI. Process 1 is labor intensive using a high proportion of direct materials and labor. Process 2 uses special packing equipment that wraps individual candy bars and packs it into a box of 24 bars. After which
Premium Cost accounting Profit Employment
The most concerning issue is the way Live Well Inc. deal with consignment and the recognition of revenue. As Live Well Inc. sells products through another party‚ being the sales coordinators‚ they cannot recognize revenue as the consignment of goods does not constitute a sale. They can only identify the revenue when the consignee sells the goods to a third party. This rule applies to both ASPE and IFRS standards. They currently recognize revenue upon shipment‚ however under the new IFRS 15 guidelines
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue Marketing
Case # 4 Chapter 2. Issue: There are two parties involved in the case dispute the one is called plaintiff‚ according to Kubasek. ‚ Browne‚ ‚ Herron‚ ‚ Giampetro-Meyer‚ ‚ Barkacs‚ ‚ Dhooge‚ ‚ & Williamson‚ (2012) the definition of plaintiff is‚ “ the person or party who initiates a lawsuit (an action) before a court by filing a complaint with the clerk of the court against the defendant(s). Also known as claimant or complainant‚” (page‚ G22). In this case Jarold Daniel Friedman is plaintiff;
Premium Law Appeal Court