Kaitlin Tolley MGT 331 Case 4: MagRec Inc. 1. If I were the manager I would have pushed for a more moral‚ honest solution to the problem with Partco. The company should have owned up to the poor quality parts and offer to fix any damaged parts for customers. Even though it would have cost the company time and money‚ it was the right thing to do. I think that if the company were to explain the situation to Partco- with the one bad batch of parts‚ and assured them that it wouldn’t happen again and
Premium Cognition Cognitive dissonance Social psychology
Case 4: MAGREC‚ Inc. 1.) Place yourself in the role of the manager. What should you do now? After considering what happened‚ would you change any of your behaviors? If I was Pat: Even though Fred wants me to fire Dinah‚ I believe that if I was to fire her‚ Dinah would file a lawsuit for wrongful discharge. My values and morals should not be the deciding factor in determining if Dinah’s actions are grounds for dismal. As such‚ I would meet with Fred‚ and explain to him the result
Premium Cognitive dissonance Cognition Cognitive bias
Case 5 Magrec‚ Inc. 1. I would let a day pass and then request another meeting with Dinah indicating a sincere desire to work through the matter and the need to come to an understanding and agreement of how to work together and with the team moving forward. At that meeting‚ I would start off and thank Dinah for bringing the Partco matter to my attention. I would communicate with Dinah that I respect her strong feelings and beliefs behind her actions regarding the Partco matter but indicate
Premium Social psychology Cognitive dissonance Cognition
Case 4: Distortions Caused By Inappropriate Allocation Base Chocolate Bars‚ Inc. Case Background. Chocolate Bars‚ inc. (CBI) manufactures chocolate candy bars with three variants – Almond Dream‚ Krispy Krackle‚ and Creamy Crunch. There are 2 distinct production processes for each product of CBI. Process 1 is labor intensive using a high proportion of direct materials and labor. Process 2 uses special packing equipment that wraps individual candy bars and packs it into a box of 24 bars. After which
Premium Cost accounting Profit Employment
The most concerning issue is the way Live Well Inc. deal with consignment and the recognition of revenue. As Live Well Inc. sells products through another party‚ being the sales coordinators‚ they cannot recognize revenue as the consignment of goods does not constitute a sale. They can only identify the revenue when the consignee sells the goods to a third party. This rule applies to both ASPE and IFRS standards. They currently recognize revenue upon shipment‚ however under the new IFRS 15 guidelines
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue Marketing
Case 12-4 Wayside Inns‚ Inc. 1. Pro side: The proposed expansion appears to meet the firm’s stated expansion criteria; The existing inn is clearly operating at or near its practical capacity; The analysis is based on one year only‚ and it ignores the fact that the management and reservation fees stay within the overall firm. Con side: The ROI is projected to decrease with the investment; The turnover count might be grossly overstated. This depends on how these data are collected. The same person
Premium Management Evaluation
carrying value of an asset is not recoverable. Per the same standards‚ carrying value is not recoverable “if it exceeds the expected future cash flows to be derived from the asset on an undiscounted basis” (FASB‚ ASC 360-10). In the Property Solutions Inc. case‚ the carrying value of the building on 10/1/2017 was $1‚650‚000 and the expected future cash flows are $1‚214‚940. Per the definition of impairment loss stated above‚ the asset is impaired. In calculating the loss‚ we must compare the carrying value
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Asset Balance sheet
MEMO Subject: Solution to Case 04-4‚ Three Little Pigs Inc. Accounting Issue: Three Little Pigs Inc. inventory consists of livestock held for sale‚ developed‚ and processed (both internal and external). On September 30‚ 2002‚ the company states that even though market prices fell below the cost‚ Three Little Pigs Inc. is unwilling to accept impairment on their inventory due to increase revenue believed to be made up in the fourth quarter which will cover all losses from the decline. Secondly
Premium Price Economics Pork
The Acquisition of Consolidated Rail Corporation (A) CASE 4 Group 3: Antonio Carlos Teles Caleia #1028 Federica Carcani #2258 Edoardo Covicchio #2259 Leandro José Pereira Domingues #1023 Francesca Romana Gambini #2260 Mergers‚ Acquisition and Restructuring (TB) Prof. Josè Neves de Almeida Q1. The rationale behind the intention of CSX to buy Conrail is mainly to anticipate a proposal from the other big player in the market Norfolk Southern. Both CSX and Norfolk Southern have basically the same
Premium Stock market Norfolk Southern Railway Takeover
position to carter to this increase in order in the future‚ they are in for a heavy loss and as a result they might even consider an employee redundancy plan also. After this meeting trade unions requested some conditions also. Problem Statement In this case we can identify several Management issues which influenced for the smooth functioning of the company. Those issues as follows; Issue 1 Organization decided to increase their production and implement an incentive program for employees who had produce
Premium Motivation Performance appraisal Management