Individual Project Capstone Case Study – Arthur Andersen LLP Bus 680 – Economics for Business Decisions Summer 2013 1. Discuss the environmental‚ strategic and organizational changes that occurred over the life of Andersen in the context of figure 11.1. While Andersen started off as a stable environment‚ once changes started being made to the main focus of the company many changes were expedited. While still successful in it’s auditing business‚ other opportunities arose that allowed for quicker
Premium Arthur Andersen Enron Big Four auditors
addition‚ Enron’s trading business adopted mark-to-market accounting‚ which meant that once a long-term contract was signed‚ income was estimated as the present value of net future cash flows‚ even though in some cases there were serious questions about the viability of these contracts and their associated costs. Author Andersen provided both consulting and auditing services which created an inherent conflict of interest. On one hand‚ Andersen was auditing an Enron financial recording system and strategy
Premium Enron Enron scandal
being subpoenaed by the SEC‚ predictably hindering the investigation. During May of 2002‚ Arthur Andersen LLP was finally indicted on charges of obstruction of justice by the Southern Texas District Court‚ served by Michael Chertoff. The jury believed that Arthur Andersen and its employees were in violation of 18 US Code § 1512‚ a public law which covers “tampering with a witness‚ victim‚ or an informant”5‚ due to the mass destruction of documents in anticipation of the upcoming SEC investigation
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States
Rise & Fall of Arthur Andersen‚ LLP Abstract Enron was a natural gas company that was formed in 1985 by Kenneth Lay. By 1992‚ Enron was the largest selling company of natural gas in North America. In October 2001 a scandal involving Enron was emerging. This scandal led to the fall of the company. The Enron case and many others cases led to the collapse of other companies that did business with them which included one of the largest accounting firms in Chicago;
Premium Enron Arthur Andersen Accounting scandals
Running head: Management Planning Paper on Arthur Andersen Management Planning Paper on Arthur Andersen In 1913‚ the company Arthur Andersen started by Arthur Andersen and Clarence Delany by the name of Andersen‚ Delany‚ & Co. In 1918‚ it was given the name Arthur Andersen & Co. The company supplied tax‚ consulting services and auditing for the large business‚ and itself had a position in the "Big Five" accounting firms. In 2002‚ this firm was found guilty for auditing an energy corporation
Premium Corporation Social responsibility Arthur Andersen
the Demise of Arthur Andersen The planning function of management is critical to the success of any organization. Innovative ideas‚ perfect products‚ and highly skilled employees fail to become assets if no plans are in place for how these assets will be used to achieve the organization’s goals. In the case of the once‚ highly successful accounting firm‚ Arthur Andersen‚ management’s failure to plan effectively for crises led to its demise. Management Planning at Arthur Andersen In today’s business
Premium Arthur Andersen Enron Enron scandal
economics Professor Arthur Andersen started the accounting firm Arthur Andersen & Co. Arthur Andersen as an accounting firm to offer certification for corporate balance sheets 1. Arthur Andersen & Co. created an initial setup of the consulting unit when it formed the Administrative Accounting group in 1942. The Administrative Accounting main tasks were developing systems related to accounting ‚ and different methods and procedures for Arthur Andersen clients. In the 1950s‚ Arthur Andersen starts giving
Premium Accenture Accenture Arthur Andersen
demonstrate reputation in The Crucible. In the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller; the playwright uses his characters to not only show the diverse authority that arises from reputation‚ but also the impotent struggles one will face without a reputation. We are given three different types of characters within The Crucible‚ but only two that make a difference. The three types are the extremely high‚ the mediocre‚ and the substantially low reputation characters. The characters‚ whose reputations are mediocre
Premium The Crucible Salem witch trials Salem, Massachusetts
Arthur Andersen LLP‚ which is over a span of nearly 90 years‚ would become one of the "Big five" largest accounting firms in the United States. Moreover‚ the accounting firm seen as the symbol of trust‚ integrity and ethic. The good reputation is derived from the advent of consulting business‚ which was developed by Leonard Spack. However‚ with the growth of consulting services‚ many accounting firms viewed it as a successful model that should be emulated‚ so that the competition pressure increasing
Premium Enron Audit Big Four auditors
Examining the Failure of Arthur Andersen Hester Rall LDR 531 November‚ 28 2011 Tom Melpolder Examining the Failure of Arthur Andersen Introduction Organizational Behavior (OB) is the study of an organizations individuals‚ groups and structures and its impact on workplace behavior (Yukl‚ 2010). In reviewing the failure of the storied Arthur Andersen (AA) accounting firm we see the influence of individuals’ decisions‚ particularly that of its leaders‚ but also the lack of individual accountability
Premium Big Four auditors Arthur Andersen Organizational studies