CRIMINAL LAW-I CASE ANALYSIS DR. RAM MANOHAR LOHIA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW (2013-2014) CRIMINAL LAW-I FINAL DRAFT OF CASE STUDY ON LALLAN RAI v. STATE OF BIHAR SUBMITTED BY PAAVAN AWASTHI Roll no.-85 SUBMITTED TO Dr. K.A. Pandey ASST. PROFFESOR of LAW Sec-B‚ Semester-3 RMLNLU 2ND Year. PAAVAN AWASTHI‚ Roll No. 85‚ 3rd SEM‚ B.A. LL.B. (HONS)‚ RMLNLU 1|Page CRIMINAL LAW-I CASE ANALYSIS TITLE LALLAN RAI AND OTHERS……………………………………………..….APPELLANTS Versus
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Supreme court Criminal law
In the case of State v. Rounds‚ the defense challenges the conduct of Officer Oliver Towns and the evidence his conduct yielded. The defense wages their action on three major cases‚ all of which apply‚ but none in the way cited: Riley V. California‚ 573 U.S. ____ (2014)‚ Wong Sun v. United States‚ 371 U.S. 471‚ (1963) and Carroll v United States‚ 267 U.S. 132 (1925). This case can be narrowed down to three stages: the stop‚ the search and the seizure. All of which‚ when performed‚ obeyed the limits
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
Prepare Case: Mary Kay Cosmetics‚ Inc. (course pack) a. What motivates Mary Kay consultants? • Personal reinforcement : Independent consultants can choose their own recruits. • Recognition and prizes: increase their sales and recruiting by prizes and recognition for progress. Winners’ names were listed in Applause‚ Mary Kay’s monthly magazine for consultants. Directors at their own expense and discretion reward unit members for achieving milestones. • Gifts and prizes handed out by directors
Premium Motivation Incentive
Case of Braswell v. United States Team A Bridget Sarris‚ Bonnie Kyle‚ Erlyn Cruz‚ Ernest Snyder LAW / 421 Robert Tisher May 27‚ 2013 BRASWELL v. UNITED STATES This case presents the question whether the custodian of corporate records may resist a subpoena for such records on the ground that the act of production would incriminate him in violation of the Fifth Amendment. We conclude that he may not. From 1965 to 1980‚ petitioner Randy Braswell operated his business — which comprises
Premium Legal entities Supreme Court of the United States Business law
Royal Bengal Tiger The Royal Bengal Tiger‚ once known as the reigning feline of Asia‚ are now on the brink of extinction. This beautiful species is quickly disappearing due to human activity. Land development has pushed back forestry‚ which is making it almost impossible for tigers to survive in their range of natural habitat. Additionally‚ even though it’s illegal to own‚ hunt or trap tigers‚ poachers continue to trap and sell tiger parts on the black market. Furthermore‚ tigers are being separated
Premium Tiger
PARTITION OF BENGAL -Anandita Lidhoo‚ 10th ICSE‚ Sreenidhi International School 2015 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Lord Curzon 3. Reasons behind the partition 4. The anti-partition movement 5. Boycott and Swadeshi movements 6. Reaction of the British government 7. Impact of the boycott and Swadeshi movements 8. Conclusion 9. Bibliography INTRODUCTION The decision to affect the Partition of Bengal was announced in July 1905 by the Viceroy of India‚ Lord Curzon
Premium Bengal British Raj India
Partitiobengal of bengol 1903: -bengal was the hot bed for revolutionary activity -bengal united its power‚divied will pull in different ways 1904: -L.Curzor took surway of bengal. NEED FOR PARTITION / UNOFFICAIL REASON -curb the uprising of the rising power of bengal -muslim would welcome this action -divide the unity of muslim and hindu Oficial reason -it was to big province ( consited of bihar‚ orisa and bengal)mention population with area of bengal -it was administratively starved
Premium Bengal Bangladesh Kolkata
STATE v. PRANKCUS Facts: Judd approached the defendant in an attempt to calm him. The defendant then punched Judd in the face. A brief fight ensured between Judd and the defendant during which a shelf with ceramic mugs fell on the floor and shattered. Doucette‚ Anderson and Potkaj attempted to break up the fight. Anderson and Potkaj grabbed Judd by his arms to restrain him while Doucette came up behind the defendant and wrapped his arms around him to stop the fight. The defendant broke free from
Premium Jury Judge Court
PARTITION OF BENGAL: 1905 Partitioning Bengal was first considered in 1903. There were also additional proposals to separate Chittagong and the districts of Dhaka and Mymensingh from Bengal and attaching them to the province of Assam. Similarly incorporating Chhota Nagpur with the central provinces. The government officially published the idea in January 1904‚ and in February‚ Lord Curzon made an official tour to eastern districts of Bengal to assess public opinion on the partition. He consulted
Premium Bangladesh West Bengal India
Issue: Barry Jewell was convicted of burglary with a deadly weapon resulting in serious bodily injury‚ a class A felony. Also‚ Battery resulting in serious bodily injury‚ a class C felony. Rule: The court used the case‚ Ellyson V. State‚ 603 N.E.2d 1369‚ 1373 (Ind. Ct.App.1992) In that case‚ Ellyson was charged with burglary because he broke into the house where him and his estranged wife lived with the intent to rape her. He was still charged with burglary even though he had the right to possession
Premium Felony Marriage Crimes