Big Time Toymaker Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Big Time Toymaker (BTT) develops‚ manufactures‚ and distributes board games and other toys to the United States‚ Mexico‚ and Canada. Chou is the inventor of a new strategy game he named Strat. BTT was interested in distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou whereby BTT paid him $25‚000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. The exclusive negotiation agreement stipulated that no distribution
Premium Target Corporation Wal-Mart Management
Case 1 1. ｃ: Because‚a federal court has more extensive jurisdiction than a state court. While the jurisdiction of state courts are limited by their boundaries‚ the federal court system covers the entire nation. An important limit to diversity jurisdiction is that only cases involving more than $75‚000 in potential damages may be filed in a federal court. 2. ｂ : n the legal system of the United States‚ a long arm statute is a law which allows a court to exercise
Premium Law Jurisdiction
Jonah Watson Business Law Case Analysis #3 IN YOUR COURT A remedy is the relief provided for an innocent party when the other party has breached the contract. There are two types of remedies; remedies in equity and remedies at law. Remedies in equity are only awarded only if the remedy at law is inadequate. Remedies at law normally award monetary damages Ken‚ the owner of a famous candy store‚ and Sweet‚ Inc. have entered into a contract‚ essentially designating Sweet‚ Inc. as his
Premium Damages Tort Contract
BugUSA‚ Inc. - Case ScenarioThis scenario presents the case of BugUSA‚ Inc.; as a team‚ we endeavor to address the legal ramifications of each company’s activities. BugUSA‚ Inc. has legal rights to intellectual property protection‚ and this paper explores the options available within that realm. WIRETAP‚ Inc. will face civil liability claims if caught in its underhanded measures‚ and possibly a civil RICO suit; BugUSA’s security guard Walter‚ however‚ has also created a case against its own interests
Premium Tort
Carnival Cruise Lines Focus: This case is being viewed from the perspective of Mickey Arison‚ Chairman and CEO‚ who is reviewing the current situation and planning strategically for the future. Objective: The objective of this case analysis is to identify strategic recommendations‚ which Carnival can employ to achieve its vision and mission. Problem How can Carnival continue to grow by increasing market share and increase profit margins while maintain their brand image
Premium Marketing
Big Time Toymaker Helen Latscha Elizabeth Martin John Hong David Cho LAW/421 Week 4 November 19‚ 2014 Dr. Mark Pugatch BS‚ MBA‚ JD Big Time Toymaker According to Melvin‚ 2011 “an agreement may result in a binding contract‚ whether it is an oral or written agreement between parties”. Big Time Toymaker (BTT) had shown interest in the new strategy game developed by Chou‚ called Strat. There were oral agreements for exclusive distribution rights‚ but had stipulations that it must be in writing. There
Premium Contract Common law Contract law
neutral third party or panel of experts hears a dispute and imposes a resolution of the parties” (Miller & Jentz‚ 2008‚ p.50). However‚ both parties must sign and agree to the above statement for it to be acknowledged as a legal judgment. In the case of Thomas Baker and Osborne Development Corporation it gets a little bit more involved. For starters‚ Osborne Development purchased the home warranty program administered by Home Buyers Warranty and signed the agreement of arbitration with them.
Premium Appeal Arbitration Dispute resolution
Executive Summary Various issues in the common law arise when agents make contracts on behalf of principals. Should a principal be bound when his agent makes a contract on his behalf that he would immediately wish to disavow? The tradeoffs resemble those in tort‚ so the least-cost avoider principle is useful for deciding which agreements are binding and can unify a number of different doctrines in agency law. In particular‚ an efficiency explanation can be found for the undisclosed-principal rule
Premium Contract
1. Give an example of a case that would fall under diversity jurisdiction. Explain all of the key elements of such a case. A federal court’s power to hear any case where the amount in controversy exceeds $75‚000 and no plaintiff shares a state of citizenship with any defendant. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Diversity jurisdiction is one of the two main types of subject-matter jurisdiction in federal court. Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary The power of the federal courts to decide
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD DIPLOMA IN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Comment [DT1]: Example: DBMD1070E COURSE CODE BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT GROUP MEMBERS NO 1. 2. 3. Name Full Name Full Name FIN NO: FIN No: 12345678P PM Comment [DT2]: Write down date assignment was handed in DATE: _______________________ ANALYSIS RESEARCH ORGANIZATION PRESENTATION /40 /30 /15 /15 Comment [DT3]: Make sure it is
Premium Corporation