Case Summary: -Bob owns a Jewelry store -Sam operates electronic security equipment store -Bob and Sam are friends -Monday‚ Bob held a casual conversation with Sam about fitting his store with "closed circuit television and the best available electronic locks" -Tuesday‚ Sam sent Bob a Quotation of price "Lists of models and List of price" -Wednesday‚ Bob Replied BY POST. "Choice of Supreme Model for camera" -Posted to old address‚ Sam received on Saturday and emailed on the same day "
Premium Contract
Case Study # 10 Denver Health Network: ABC Analysis 1. Estimate the base (initial) cost of each alternative. Here‚ you just need to put in the appropriate RED input from the information in the case study. The answers will be spit out. Which alternative has the lower total cost? Why? Alternative 2 has the lowest total per a procedure cost. Operating costs of Alternative 1 is $86.15‚ which is lower than Alternative 2 of $92.15Alternative 2 is higher in operation al cost because there is six dollars
Premium Costs Economics Cost
CASE 10 : LINCOLN ELECTRIC PRINCIPLE OF MANAGEMENT LECTURER : SUBMISSION DATE : NAME Background of the case Question 1 Does Lincoln follow a hierarchical or decentralized approach to management? Explain your answer and give examples. Answer: Lincoln follows a decentralized approach to management. The company han an open-door policy for all top executives‚ middle managers‚ and production workers‚ and regular face-to-face communication
Premium Management
Case Jonathan‚ a moneylender makes a loan of $1‚000 to Sheba on Sheba’s representation that she is 19 years old. Sheba is in fact 17 years old. She enrolled for diploma course with a private college for $500‚ spent $200 on a holiday‚ and the balance of $300 on a mini hi-fi set. She now refuses to pay Jonathan. In this case‚ we are acting for Jonathan (plaintiff). Jonathan sues Sheba (defendant) because of free consent and capacity. Free consent that we talk is about misrepresentation whereas capacity
Premium Contract Contract law
This essay will discuss the Case study by firstly identifying four elements of contract‚ then justifying duties of Mr. Martin with applying the principles of pre-existing contractual duties. Finally a discussion about part payment of debt and promissory estoppel will be explained. Likewise‚ this essay will evaluate the knowledge of common law and agency relationship. QUESTION 1 a) Four essential elements of a contract should be Offer‚ Acceptance‚ Intention to create legal relations and Consideration
Premium Common law Contract Law
be distinguished from ITT Invitation to Treat Is an action by one party which may appear to be a contractual offer but which is actually inviting others to make an offer of their own. Invitation to treat lacks of promissory intent 1. Boots Case (Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd) Self service PS sued Boots cash for breach of pharmacy and poison act by selling certain poison not under supervision of registered pharmacist as boots cash is a
Premium Contract
Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning‚ Volume 31‚ 2004 THE CASE BRIEF A Model for Case Analysis‚ Writing and Discussion John Washbush University of Wisconsin-Whitewater washbusj@uww.edu ABSTRACT The session addresses a common problem in undergraduate case discussion and writing—the tendency for students to reiterate lengthy lists and discussions of facts of the case without effectively identifying key facts while failing to adequately addressing their implications. The case brief
Premium Strategic management Management SWOT analysis
1. The fact of the case Respondent (Schmidt) was a consulting engineer for the appellant company (Kepong Prospecting Ltd). The appellant company was the holders of certain mining leases in respect of deposits of iron ore. They did not work these deposits themselves but allowed them to be worked on tribute by another company named Kepong Mines Ltd. Their business in practice would seem to be confined to collecting the tribute and distributing it to their shareholders after making arrangements
Premium Civil procedure Money Appeal
Cuong Khong Bill Tennyson/ Business Law January 24‚ 2013 BRIEFING CASES… COMMONWEALTH v. BERGGREN 398 Mass. 338 (1986) Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts‚ Barnstable. May 6‚ 1986. August 26‚ 1986. ============================================================================ FACTS: On March 29‚ 1983‚ about 8:28 P.M.‚ Patrolman Michael Aselton of the Barnstable police department was on radar duty at Old Stage Road in Centerville. He saw the defendant’s motorcycle speed by him and commenced
Premium Jury Crime Court
Business Law Case Study In the case presented‚ Biff Smith‚ the Chief of Police of the local department ordered a set of bicycles off of a local storeowner‚ Dirk Right. This was no simple order though‚ in fact Biff intended on starting a bike patrol unit within the local department. Biff went to Dirks Bicycle shop to place an order. The order was for five mountain bikes to be used for patrol so they had to be custom made in order to sport the police decals. Biff was very familiar with the Schwinn
Premium Management Strategic management Balance sheet