UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY‚ JAMAICA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION BUSINESS LAW LAW OF CONTRACT TUTORIAL SHEET 1. On the first of January‚ David telephoned Donavan and offered to sell his car to him for $100.00. The offer was to remain until the 8th of January. That same evening‚ Donavan saw David in the bar and gave him a hundred dollar bill. He said to David: “I really appreciate you keeping the offer open until I can raise the money. Here’s a beer money for your trouble”
Premium Contract Advertising
1- Contract law provide rules to determine which contract terms will be enforced and which promises must be kept. True or False 2- A is an assertion that something either will or will not happen in the future. A: 3- A contract needs two requirement and Agreement is required to form a contract‚ regardless of whether it is formed in the traditional A: 4- which is generally defined
Premium Contract
produce a written answer for each of the following problem questions using the ILAC approach and bring your answers in print form to your tutorial class on Teaching week 3. Topics Topics 1 and 2 – Introducing Law and Exercising Legal Skills Your preparation Read Chapters 1-3 of Business Law and attend the Lectures on the first two topics. Problem 1: There are a number of websites devoted to the republic issue. Sites such as that of the Australian Republican Movement (www.republic.org.au) support
Premium Australia United Kingdom Republic
|Argued December 9‚ 1952 | |Reargued December 8‚ 1953 | |Decided May 17‚ 1954 | |Full case name |Oliver Brown‚ et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka‚ et | | |al. | |Citations |347 U.S. 483 (more) | |
Premium Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court of the United States
IRAC Brief Issue In the case of Pierre Konowaloff‚ Paris‚ France‚ v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art New York‚ New York‚ Pierre Konowaloff alleges that the Metropolitan Museum of Art acquired‚ displayed and retained a piece of art that was confiscated by the Russian Bolshevik regime from his great-grandfather in 1918. After gaining power in 1917‚ the Bolshevik regime issued decrees nationalizing property‚ and abolishing the private ownership of land and making museums property of the state. The
Free United States New York City Appeal
Charlie is going to rescind the contract. He demands return of his money and compensation for the loss of commission on several high profile sales of his business. He wants to rescind the contract because the package of software recommend by Carmine was obsolete‚ despite Carmine’s assurances. This problem is concerned with the contents of the contract which is term in the contract‚ the misrepresentation and unconscionable conduct. Charlie will claim that Carmine verbal assurances about the
Premium Contract Contract law Misrepresentation
[Cite as Pusey v. Bator‚ 94 Ohio St.3d 275‚ 2002-Ohio-795.] PUSEY‚ EXR.‚ APPELLANT‚ v. BATOR ET AL.; GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION‚ APPELLEE. [Cite as Pusey v. Bator (2002)‚ 94 Ohio St.3d 275.] Torts — Wrongful death — Employer hires independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property — Inherently dangerous work exception — If someone is injured by weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence‚ employer is vicariously liable even though guard responsible is an employee of the
Premium Security guard
Case Analysis: McDonald’s Corporation 1. How are customer’s tastes changing in the fast-food industry? What impact do these changes have on McDonald’s sales and net income? Consumer tastes are changing in the fast food industry in a way that could hurt or is hurting them‚ profits wise. People tastes and preferences changes every now and then and these fast food companies must adapt to these changes in order to gain market share and profits. The reasons behind this could be of healthy
Premium Nutrition Marketing Fast food
The Case of Avco Environmental Services Participant: Mohanrasu G Batch : PGXPM 10 Questions: What should Chantale do? What are the reasonable limits on loyalty to one’s employer? Would it make difference if Chantale had a position of greater authority? Would it make a difference if Chantale had scientific expertise? Chantale Leroux had reported to her immediate supervisor as soon as she got to know that the medical wastes are getting disposed of in municipal landfill. Immediate
Premium Ethics Business ethics
------------------------------------------------- Foss v Harbottle Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows
Premium Pleading Plaintiff Corporation