Miami School District Marisha Evans MGT/445 June 5‚ 2013 Robert Williams Miami School District An increase in enrolment has resulted in the Miami School District school boundaries to change. The decision was unexpected and many parents outraged by the school board’s decision. Experts have been hired by the school board to redraw the boundaries. The school board received several complaints from parents which voiced their concerns regarding the decision. The parents
Free Teacher Education School
Case: Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Facts: In March 1963‚ a kidnapping and sexual assault happened in Phoenix‚ Arizona. On March 13 Ernesto Miranda‚ 23‚ was arrested in his home‚ taken to the police station‚ recognized by the victim‚ and taken into an interrogation room. Miranda was not told of his rights to counsel prior to questioning. Investigators emerged from the room with a written confession signed by Miranda. It included a typed disclaimer‚ also signed by Miranda‚ stating that he had “full knowledge
Premium
Tennimon V. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Brief and explanation: In 1984‚ appellant Elaine Tennimon‚ as personal representative of decedent’s estate filed suit for wrongful death against appellee helicopter manufacturer. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee helicopter manufacturer on the ground that appellant’s wrongful death suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Appellant‚ Elaine Tennimon appeals the district courts grant of summary judgment in favor of Bell
Premium Appeal United States Jury
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Citation: D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Appeal from: Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Inc [2013] FCA 65 Parties: YVONNE D’ARCY v MYRIAD GENETICS INC and GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED File number: NSD 359 of 2013 Judges: ALLSOP CJ‚ DOWSETT‚ KENNY‚ BENNETT & MIDDLETON JJ Date of judgment: 5 September 2014 Catchwords: PATENTS – Patent including claims for isolated nucleic
Premium Jury Supreme Court of the United States United States
Case Brief for: Obergefell v. Hodges‚ 576 U.S. (2015). Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio‚ Kentucky‚ Michigan‚ and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the
Premium Marriage Same-sex marriage Homosexuality
to the case. These documents will help me get a better understanding of the nature of the lawsuit and what impact the lawsuit could have on the proposed elections equipment upgrades. Second‚ I would need to find out what type of equipment the elections commission is proposing. Some governments have discussed using
Premium Elections Election Voting system
Case name: Southeastern Land Fund‚ Inc. V. Real Estate World‚ Inc. 237 Ga. 227‚ 227 S.E.2d 340 (Ga‚ 1976). Facts: The Seller brought an action against the Buyer. The allegations were about a contract of sale of a real estate. The seller’s action sought to recover the price of $45‚000 plus the interests; as well as to recover their lawyer’s fees upon a promissory note referred in the contract. The buyer’s appeal was founded on the basis that the trial judged erred in granting summary judgment in
Premium Law Jury Appeal
• Question 1 0 out of 1 points Computer-based training and E-learning provide all the following benefits except: Answer Selected Answer: they can be more cost effective • Question 2 1 out of 1 points When we learn by watching others perform a task‚ this is known as: Answer Selected Answer: modeling • Question 3 1 out of 1 points _________ refers to the effective application of principles learned to what is required on the job. Answer
Premium Apprenticeship Employment Management
Atkins v. Peak‚ 514 N.E. 2d 850 (1987) Decision by Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Facts: On March 20‚ 1982‚ plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sustained serious injuries while skiing at Jimmy Peak Ski Resort. On December 5‚ 1984 plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sued defendant Jimmy Peak. Plaintiff alleged that her injuries were caused by defective ski equipment she had rented from the rental facility on the premises. She further alleged that the defendant failed to inspect ski equipment and the failure
Premium Complaint Pleading Injury
I have never been to a school board meeting before‚ so I am not entirely sure what to expect. I know it is an open meeting‚ so I am sure there will be several parents of students in the district as well as citizens of area that will be affected by decisions made by the school board. In terms of the agenda‚ the board will undoubtedly discuss future school functions and the associated budgets‚ as well as personnel matters. This is a policy-making meeting so I do not expect there to be much input from
Premium High school