I. John M. Richmond v. State of Iowa‚ 97-954 (Plaintiff John M. Richmond) v. (Defendant the State of Iowa) II. Procedural History Defendant John M. Richmond and partner Robyn Krell were in an intimate relationship. Once the relationship ended‚ Richmond appeared at Krell’s residence and forced her to have sex with him while holding a knife in his hand. Richmond called his hired counselor‚ Fr. Dick Osing for counseling on the incident. Richmond was charged with second-degree sexual abuse. Richmond
Premium United States Appeal Law
Holmes v. South Carolina United States Supreme Court 547 U.S. 319 (2006) : Facts: Holmes was charged with first degree murder‚ first degree burglary and robbery in connection with an incident involving an 86 year old woman‚ Mary Stewart. Holmes was also charged for the rape and murder of Stewart. At the trial court‚ Holmes was convicted by the South Carolina Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. The petitioner had appealed and the court granted a new trail. During
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
McCulloch v. Maryland Brief Fact Summary. The state of Maryland enacted a tax that would force the United States Bank in Maryland to pay taxes to the state. McCulloch‚ a cashier for the Baltimore‚ Maryland Bank‚ was sued for not complying with the Maryland state tax. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Congress may enact laws that are necessary and proper to carry out their enumerated powers. The United States Constitution (Constitution) is the supreme law of the land and state laws cannot interfere with
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
Why talk about Anderson v GMC or even Keck v Wesley Medical Center? Because staffing is still an issue. It will become more of an issue as reimbursement continues to be curtailed. Moreover‚ as patient ratios are increasingly mandated‚ and studies of the impact of nurse staffing on patient outcomes are providing a growing body of knowledge‚ it is not only possible but likely that now that we can know what is safe hospital leadership will be held liable if they do not maintain safe staffing levels
Premium Physician Patient Hospital
Case Brief 764 P.2d 1316 Supreme Court of New Mexico. Billie J. RODMAN‚ Petitioner–Appellant‚ v. NEW MEXICO EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT and Presbyterian Hospital‚ Respondents–Appellees. No. 17721.Nov. 30‚ 1988. Written By: Lawrence Pelkey Facts: Billie J. Rodman‚ Appellant was employed by Presbyterian Hospital as a unit secretary for eight years when‚ on Feb 17‚ 1987‚ she was terminated under hospital personnel policies following a “third corrective action” notice. Prior restrictions
Premium Employment Telephone call Telephone
| Michael David Mitchell | Corporate Thief | | | | DuPont is an American chemical company headquartered out of Wilmington‚ Delaware. “DuPont provides a wide range of products and services for markets including agriculture‚ nutrition‚ electronics‚ communications‚ safety and protection‚ home and construction‚ transportation and apparel. One such product is Kevlar®‚ which is DuPont ’s registered trademark for a very light‚ very strong synthetic fiber that is spun into ropes or fabric
Premium Federal Bureau of Investigation Injunction
DEVRY UNIVERSITY 3005 HIGHLAND PKWY DOWNERS GROVE‚ IL 60515-5799 Terms: (Nadel v. Burger King Corp.‚ 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 2144) Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals‚ Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944‚ Combined;Newspaper Stories‚ Combined Papers Combined Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals‚ Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944‚ Combined;Newspaper Stories‚ Combined Papers Project ID: 7 of 8
Free Product liability
Hudson v. Michigan‚ 547 U.S. 586 (2006) Facts- Detroit police obtained a warrant authorizing a search for drugs and firearms at the home of Booker Hudson. When police arrived to execute the warrant‚ they announced their presence but waited “three to five seconds” before turning the knob of the unlocked front door and entering Hudson’s home. Police discovered large quantities of drugs‚ including cocaine rocks in Hudson’s pocket and a loaded gun placed in between the cushion and armrest of a chair
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
Case 4 GENERAL PRODUCTS BRITAIN Presented by: LEE CHAI LING 803654 Synopsis * Carl Mitchell took a job offer in the branch office of General Products‚ Inc.‚ multinational consumer products corporation at the British. * Two months later‚ Mitchell was miserable with his general manager – George Garrow. * Garrow is a uncritical thinking style by accept what his leaders’ idea. He make sure always by “keeping his nose clean” and not making errors‚ which he complete task by avoiding controversial
Premium Management
Hannah David 11 February 2013 Business Law Rothing v. Kallestad Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses‚ thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that
Premium Tort Contract law Implied warranty