M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Others‚ 1987 SCR (1) 819 (OLEUM GAS LEAK CASE) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India is a famous tort law Indian case that brought in the concept of “Absolute Liability”. Every citizen has a right to fresh air and to live in a pollution free environment. This originated when Oleum gas leaked from Shriram Food and Fertilizers Industry in Delhi. This created a lot of panic among the people and laid down the principles of absolute liability. FACTS Shriram Food and Fertilizers
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Leak
Tennimon V. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Brief and explanation: In 1984‚ appellant Elaine Tennimon‚ as personal representative of decedent’s estate filed suit for wrongful death against appellee helicopter manufacturer. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee helicopter manufacturer on the ground that appellant’s wrongful death suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Appellant‚ Elaine Tennimon appeals the district courts grant of summary judgment in favor of Bell
Premium Appeal United States Jury
Project 1 Virtual Presentation-ECOM15616 Company: M&R Security Inc. Business Process: Inventory Management EDWARD ROCHA-MARTINEZ (ROCHAMAE) GULSHANVIR SINGH KHAIRA(KHAIRGUL) SARABJIT SINGH (SING2932) RAJVINDER KAUR KANG (KANGRAJV) JASKARAN SINGH GILL (GILL326) April 13‚ 2015 Carlene Blackwood‚ Monday: 10-12PM Company Introduction M&R Security Inc. was created in October of 2014 by Cristhian Martinez and Amy Raad-Martinez. They provide the following services: Automation Monitoring
Premium Arizona Stock exchange Frank Lloyd Wright
Kathryn Myrick Business Law 1 Professor McDonnell Case Brief A.5 Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine Inc.‚ 968 F. 2d 1110 (11th Cir. 1992) FACTS: In 1985 Michael Savage placed an ad in the Soldier of Fortune Magazine (“SOF”) advertising “Gun For Hire”. The ad ran from June 1985 to March 1986 generating an average of 30-40 call per week for jobs ranging from murder‚ kidnapping‚ assault and other criminal activity. After three previous failed attempts on his business partner Richard Braun’s
Premium Law
Liquormart Inc. V. Rhode Island In the United Sates there have always been many controversies about both the selling and consuming of alcoholic beverages. From decades ago the topic of alcohol was still being discussed on whether or not it should be complete banned or more closely regulated. Alcohol is a very dangerous substance when mistreated. Alcohol laws are to protect both an individual person and the people in a society. When it comes to alcohol and how it should be regulated people’s views
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution Prohibition in the United States
numerous of case studies and essentially discussed why were these business choices right or wrong. The heavy teaching on ethical decision making gives students the opportunity to apply these teachings‚ it is easy to observe and analyze where things have gone wrong however it is not so easy when you are presented with a problem and the correct solution may not be the solution you wanted. A recent unethical business decision that had a large impact on society can be seen the In 2007 Young v. United Parcel
Premium
STATEMENT OF THE CASE The matter currently comes before the court on Petitioner Elizabeth Hamilton and counsel’s appeal from the 2nd Circuit award of sanctions under 28 U.S.C § 1927 (2012) for attorney’s fees to Respondent Randall’s Plumbing Supply. (J.A. 8). The initial action was brought by the Petitioner in the Southern District of New York alleging she was wrongfully terminated and seeking to recover against Respondent. (J.A. at 4.) Petitioner is represented by the law firm Sullivan & Hart
Premium Law Civil procedure Appeal
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Citation: D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Appeal from: Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Inc [2013] FCA 65 Parties: YVONNE D’ARCY v MYRIAD GENETICS INC and GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED File number: NSD 359 of 2013 Judges: ALLSOP CJ‚ DOWSETT‚ KENNY‚ BENNETT & MIDDLETON JJ Date of judgment: 5 September 2014 Catchwords: PATENTS – Patent including claims for isolated nucleic
Premium Jury Supreme Court of the United States United States
Jerrica Langlais June 22‚ 2013 Human Resource Law Burlington Industries Inc v Ellerth Introduction In the last two years there has been 11‚364 sexual harassment claims filed according to the EEOC‚ it has been decreasing in the last 4 years but it was at a all time high in 1997. While working for Burlington Industries for 15 months‚ Kimberly B. Ellerth quit because she allegedly suffered sexual harassment by her supervisor Ted Slowik. Kimberly refused all of Slowik’s advances and did
Premium Employment Harassment Pleading
W.J.T. Mitchell examines literature and representation as a whole. We must examine the term homo symbolicum‚ which gave us (humans) the ability to stand apart from any other creature. "From childhood men have an instinct ability for representation‚ and in this respect‚ man differs from other animals that he is far more imitative and learns his first lesson by representing things" (11). Humans have created a system of reading‚ writing‚ expression of memories‚ thoughts‚ or ideas on paper‚ which also
Premium Moby-Dick Herman Melville Symbol