Atavia Vigil Case Brief 38-1 Federal Election Comm’n v. Beaumont Facts In 2003‚ the corporation North Carolina Right to Life‚ Inc. sued the federal Election Commission claiming that that two FEC regulations were unconstitutional. First regulation challenged the one that stops corporations from making contributions Second regulation was the one that provides an exemption from the ban for corporate contributions for particular nonprofit corporations. NCRL believes that they met the exemption to
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
Coaching: A Case Study on the Potential of ‘Brief Coaching’ PHONE EMAIL WEB Hector Sandoval +34 664 46 10 54 hsandoval@me.com www.hsctalent.com A Case Study: The Potential of Brief Coaching Leadership Coaching: A Case Study on the Potential of ‘Brief Coaching’
Premium Leadership
LIVENT‚ INC.: An Instructional Case Michael C. Knapp Professor University of Oklahoma Price College of Business 307 W. Brooks Norman‚ Oklahoma 73019 Office phone: 405-325-5784 mknapp@ou.edu Carol A. Knapp Visiting Associate Professor University of Oklahoma Price College of Business 307 W. Brooks Norman‚ Oklahoma 73019 ABSTRACT: Like many financial frauds‚ the Livent‚ Inc. fraud was masterminded by a few individuals‚ primarily Garth Drabinsky‚ a Broadway “impresario” who had received
Premium Audit Accountant Accountancy
Rappler’s case that led for the SEC to revoke its registration as a corporation pointed to‚ according to SEC‚ its violation on the rules on foreign investment in media companies in the Philippines. Under the 1987 Constitution and various Philippine laws‚ a media company must be owned and controlled 100% by Filipinos. If a Philippine media company has foreign investor control of more than 0% of the company‚ then the media company disobey the law related to control restrictions. The case of Rappler
Premium Mass media Mass media United States Constitution
Description In Mc Grory v. Applied Signal Technology‚ Inc.‚ No. H036597‚ it discusses the case of wrongful termination of a manager who alleges gender discrimination claims. The facts of case describe John McGrory who worked as a department manager for Applied Signal Technology‚ Inc for 4 yrs from 2004. Later in 2008‚ Mc Grory gave Thomas a recorded verbal warning‚ after consultation with the HR department for her poor work performance and a written performance improvement plan in 2009. However
Premium United States Law Appeal
Louis Vuitton Malletier v Dooney & Bourke Inc. In this famous case known as the “Battle of the Handbags” Louis Vuitton (LV) sues Dooney & Burke (D&B) for trademark infringement of its multicolore line. The Plaintiff‚ Louis Vuitton Malletier ‚is a French fashion house founded in 1854 by Louis Vuitton. The famous label is well known for its LV monogram‚ which is featured on most of its products. Louis Vuitton is considered as one of the world’s most valuable and prestigious brands. The LV monogram
Premium Trademark Supreme Court of the United States Trademark infringement
• The market is still in the innovating phase and is not ready Many people believe the implementation of BIM is still in the innovation stages and is not ready for public use. Recent surveys do suggest this; for example‚ a survey carried out by The NFB BIM-readiness survey gathered information stating 74% of all contractors are not at all familiar‚ or only vaguely familiar‚ with the levels of BIM‚ 81% of SME contractors are no more than vaguely familiar with the levels of BIM‚ 42% of large contractors
Premium Management Marketing Project management
International‚ Inc. v. Goody’s Family Clothing United States District Court‚ Northern Division 54 F.2d 765 In the case of Banco v. Goody’s‚ the courts ruled that Goody’s was not wrong for canceling the contract due to the finding of justified in reasonably concluding that Banco could not deliver the product by the date set in the first purchase order between the parties and the failure to deliver the goods by that date would have substantially impaired the value of those goods to Goody’s
Premium Breach of contract Contract law Contract
I. Brief Background of the Case August Scientific Instruments‚ Inc. (ASI‚ Inc.) is a small private company which specializes in the manufacturing of miniature electromechanical components. It is located on a small but progressive town wherein a Technical Education Institute is also based. At first‚ the company underwent several problems and setbacks and was able to grow steadily and expand its operations until in 1958; it was able to acquire additional investments‚ substantial monthly sales and
Premium Money Depreciation Capital accumulation
Merck & Co.‚ Inc. Case If one hold a key to resolve a very serious problem‚ one has a responsibility to put an effort to make it happen‚ at least try one’s best. In this case‚ river blindness disease was a very serious problem‚ and Dr. Vagelos was the one who could make a decision as to whether the research and development of a human version of ivermectin should be carried on‚ then it was his responsibility to pursue it. Caused by a parasitic worm carried by a tiny black fly‚ the disease
Premium Blindness Human Onchocerciasis