Case Brief: Zuckerman v. Antenucci Sophia Haberman LAW/531 December 01‚ 2010 Dr. Maurice Rosano Case Study: Zuckerman v. Antenucci Partnership liability tort can take place when a partner or all partners acting on partnership business causes injury to a third person. Cause of this tort could be a negligent act‚ a breach of trust‚ breach of fiduciary duty‚ defamation‚ fraud‚ or another intentional tort (Cheeseman‚ 2010‚ p. 538). Under the Uniform Partnership Act‚ partners are jointly
Premium Partnership Tort law Tort
The Marbury v Madison case (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia in the final hours of the Adams administration. When James Madison‚ Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state‚ refused to deliver Marbury’s commission‚ Marbury‚ joined by three other similarly situated appointees‚ petitioned for
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
Richardson was required to pay child support accordingly and have visitation rights. The case is good law. It is binding to Arkansas court. Clearly‚ Arkansas court made the final judgment about the custody of the child and visitation by the father. b) Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.‚ 45 A.2d 553 (1945). The Court of Chancery is not given the jurisdiction to award penalties on government cost recovery cases as it is of limited jurisdiction. Therefore its laws are not mandatory as it can be honored
Premium United States Law Court
Corporation. 123 Ohio St.3d 216‚ 2009-Ohio-4231 Facts of the Case: LaNisa Allen appealed the original judgment in favor of Totes/Isotoner Corporation on the issue of whether the Ohio Fair Employment Practices Act‚ as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act‚ prohibits an employer from discriminating against a female employee because of or on the basis of lactation. Relevant law associated includes whether Allen established a prima facie case of “sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy‚” or whether
Premium Pregnancy Discrimination Prima facie
Unfortunately‚ public defenders are the hardest working attorneys and sector of the legal system because they are severely understaffed. Therefore‚ they are represented by public defenders‚ which is a granted constitutional right in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright. This case specified that states are required to provide defense attorneys to defendants convicted of a felony or serious crime that cannot provide attorney representation for themselves. According to Brunt (2015)‚ “approximately 80% of the offenders
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
The Tinker v. Des Moines case happended during the Vietnam War between 1955 and 1975. Thousans of protests occured againts the Vietnam War in the United States between those 2 dates. In the fall of 1965 in Iowa with a group of 3 minors named Mary Beth Tinker‚ John Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt. They came to School wearing black armband to protest against the Vietnam War. They were asked to take it off or they would be suspended. They disagreed and the school later suspended them because people
Premium High school Education Supreme Court of the United States
Marbury v. Madison is a court case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1803 involving William Marbury as the Plaintiff and James Madison as the Defendant (History.com staff‚ 2009). As a result of this case‚ the United States Supreme Court was granted the power to perform judicial review (“Judicial Review”‚ n.d.). With the power of judicial review‚ the United States Supreme Court is now permitted to review laws from the legislature and executive orders from the President to determine
Premium
STATEMENT OF FACTS: White V. Samsung Electronics & David Deutsch Associates is a case where the plaintiff Ms. Vanna White is suing the defendants for use of her image in their television advertisements without any form of consent from her. Vanna White is the well known hostess of Wheel of Fortune‚ a popular television show. Deutsch & Samsung teamed up to run an advertisement campaign for Samsung to edify Samsung’s brand image. During one of their advertisements appeared a robot wearing the traditional
Premium Contract Appeal Injunction
I‚ Jessica‚ write this opinion to majority on the case of Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier. The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights‚ but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others‚ he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image
Premium Freedom of speech First Amendment to the United States Constitution Human rights
1. The court case that will be written about is Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978. 2. Before this case took place‚ there had recently been many cases and laws that had been implemented regarding racial segregation and discrimination. In 1964‚ The Civil Rights Act passed which forbids racial discrimination in any program or activity receiving federal funding ((2)"Regents of the University of California v. Bakke."). The main law that was put into question and was used in the persecutor’s
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Discrimination Racism