Aglipay v. Ruiz GR 45459‚ 13 March 1937 (64 Phil 201) First Division‚ Laurel (p): 5 concur. Facts: In May 1936‚ the Director of Posts announced in the dailies of Manila that he would order the issuance of postage stamps commemorating the celebration in the City of Manila of the 33rd International Eucharistic Congress‚ organized by the Roman Catholic Church. The petitioner‚ Mons. Gregorio Aglipay‚ Supreme Head of the Philippine Independent Church‚ in the fulfillment of what he considers to be a
Premium Philippines Roman Catholic Church Christianity
Carmell Vs. Texas Punishment is the outcome to every wrong doing someone does. However‚ there’s usually a loop hole to a crime that ends up changing the final sentence . In the case of Carmell Vs. Texas‚ the crime that the defendant was charged on‚ had occurred during the time in which the state of Texas had changed the law on the action he was accused for commiting. All Scott Carmell needed to avoid life in prison for sexually assaulting his stepdaughter was a good lawyer. It is often difficult
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Appellate court
WP/04/152 What Are the Potential Economic Benefits of Enlarging the Gulf Cooperation Council? Saade Chami‚ Selim Elekdag‚ and Ivan Tchakarov © 2004 International Monetary Fund WP/04/152 IMF Working Paper Middle East and Central Asia Department What Are the Potential Economic Benefits of Enlarging the Gulf Cooperation Council? Prepared by Saade Chami‚ Selim Elekdag‚ and Ivan Tchakarov1 August 2004 Abstract This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF
Free Economics
The Pelman vs McDonald’s lawsuit was launched on behalf of various children that over a long period and frequent visits to various McDonald’s fast food restaurants developed various medical conditions deemed in the medical community and by concerned parents as serious. These conditions included diabetes‚ coronary heart disease‚ overweight conditions‚ high blood pressure as well as elevated cholesterol and other health concerns It was the plaintiff’s opinion that these conditions were incurred as
Premium
In the case of Niles vs. San Rafael‚ the primary issue at hand is negligence on the behalf of Mount Zion hospital‚ the City of San Rafael‚ the public school district‚ and pediatric physician Dr. David Haskins. Negligence‚ as it pertains to health care‚ is defined as a failure to act with reasonable care‚ and results in injury or detriment to any patient or other individual. In connection to a head injury Niles sustained while at a ball field‚ all of the previously named have been held liable for
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
Alejandra Flores Mr. Perez GOVT 2306 May 6‚ 2014 Ruiz v. Estelle Ruiz v. Estelle‚ filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas‚ eventually became the most far-reaching lawsuit on the conditions of prison incarceration in American history. It began as a civil action‚ a handwritten petition filed against the Texas Department of Corrections (TDC) in 1972 by inmate David Resendez Ruiz alleging that the conditions of his incarceration‚ such as overcrowding‚ lack of access
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Introduction: The purpose of the analysis is to see what updates need to be made to the company’s sexual harassment policy and program as a result of the new information being arisen in the case of Silvera vs Olympia Jewellery Corporation. This paper will illustrate the different laws under the Human Rights Code and how the company should try to deal with a situation involving sexual harassment. This paper will also illustrate the changes that need to be made in the sexual harassment policy to reduce
Premium Management Employment Marketing
Case Digest: U.S. vs. Ah Chong G.R. No. L-7929 March 19‚ 1910 Facts: Because of the many bad elements happening at Fort McKinley‚ Ah Chong‚ a cook‚ locked himself in his room by placing a chair against the door. After having gone to bed‚ he was awakened by someone trying to open the door of his room. He called out twice‚ Who is there‚ but received no answer. Fearing that the intruder was a robber‚ he leaped from his bed and called out again‚ If you enter the room I will kill you. But at the precise
Premium Criminal law Supreme Court of the United States Court
To: Dr. Spencer From: Ramonica Marshall Date: June 10‚ 2013 Subject: Adam vs. Circuit City Dispute The main issue in this dispute is does the FAA apply to the employment agreement that Adam signed upon hire? The rule is that FAA governs in this case. Arbitration agreements should be a part of contracts and should be enforceable according to FAA. Since Adam signed a contract with Circuit City that contained an arbitration clause‚ the analysis is that the FAA states that a signed contract
Premium Dispute resolution Alternative dispute resolution Contract
Individual Assignment #1: “Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County”. By MGMT 6374 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT November 2‚ 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Critical Issues 1 ADEA Requirements and Prima Facie Evidence ADEA Requirements for Conclusive Evidence and Relevant Court Cases Critical Evaluation of the I/O Psychologist Report 2 Potential Additional Evidence Needed for Zimpfer 3 Potential Rebuttal Evidence Needed for the County 3 Conclusions 4
Premium Prima facie Critical thinking Legal burden of proof