The father reported that he met Ms. Corbett in high school. He indicated that they were friends. The father stated that the parents started dating in 1996‚ he indicated that the relationship did not become sexual until 1997. Mr. Simms stated that he and Ms. Corbett used condom and at other times they did not. Mr. Simms reported that he was stable at this time‚ there were no hospitalizations. Mr. Simms reported that Ms. Corbett became pregnant‚ he stated that they continued to date. He indicated
Premium Patient Medicine Health care
On Monday August 21st‚ A body of a 5-year-old boy was found dead in A drive way of a home in West Mobile. The next day a daycare worker had been arrested and charged with abuse of a corpse. The name of the little boy was Kamden Dewan Johnson. Johnson was found dead in the 2100 block of Demotropolis Road in the drive way. The day after Patterson‚ a day care worker‚ was charged in the incident. She was charged with abuse of the corpse. Following the hearing‚ Rich stated that paperwork had been filed
Premium
This officer was assigned as the Field Training Officer "FTO" for OfC Malerich. Ofc. Malerich contacted and arrested Sanders during a traffic stop for a warrant issued by La Porte County. During the arrest Sanders was complied with officers orders and Ofc. Malerich used minimal force to place Sanders in handcuffs. Ofc. Malerich adjusted the handcuffs and double locked them before placing Sanders in unit #53. Cpl. Gerdzos monitored Sanders while Ofc. Malerich and Ofc. Hemphill inventoried the vehicle
Premium Police Crime Constable
Johnson v. Misercordia Hospital Case Analysis State the issue in controversy In 1980‚ patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery‚ Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery‚ resulting in partial paralysis
Premium Physician United States Medicine
The general questions being considered in Brown v Board of Education is that of segregation in schools. All people should be offered the same opportunities to an education. There were cases in the state of Kansas‚ South Carolina‚ Virginia and Delaware in which minors of the Negro race were seeking admission to public schools in their communities that were attended by white children. They were denied admission to those schools under laws that permitted segregation according to race. The policies of
Premium
Introduction Upon initial examination of this case‚ it is clear that Richard is at least‚ partly liable for the accident‚ given that it was he who crashed into the traffic light. It can be assumed that he has suffered substantial loss in the process‚ given that he has sustained a significant injury. However‚ it also is evident that Saoirse is at fault on several grounds‚ which gives Richard scope to take legal action in an attempt to recover damages for the loss he has suffered as a consequence
Premium Law Tort Crime
The importance of the three cases presented in this discussion board are major to the nations history. Each showed both the need for civil right advancement and progress that was made in this area. In the Dred Scott case the issue of freedom amongst slaves was first highlight in this nations court system. It can be argued that though Dred Scott was not successful in his attempt towards freedom‚ his case was a victory for the slave population. This is because the case examined whether African American
Premium African American Black people United States
Flagiello Case Brief Type of Court - Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Facts of the Case - Mrs. Flagiello was injured due to negligence while staying at the hospital - Mrs. Flagiello and her husband want compensation for time spent in hospital‚ loss of potential earnings‚ and added medical expense - Hospital was a charitable organization Legal Issues in the Case - Does charity grant the hospital immunity from such cases? - What was lost during the extra time spent in the hospital? - Was
Premium Tort Tort law Law
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma‚ 468 U.S. 85 (1984)‚ was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. These antitrust laws were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade. The NCAA was an organization that regulated college athletics‚ and membership was voluntary‚ although NCAA schools were not allowed
Premium National Collegiate Athletic Association College United States
References: Chapman v Mid-Essex Hospital Services [2001] All ER (D) 239 Chappel v Hart (1999) Lloyds Law Reports 223
Premium Physician