1. In Tom’s case from my point of view that Tom is full time basis as a garbage collector. And He also receives a small payment each weekend throughtout winter for playing football. And He was voted by spectators as the most player and received from local newspaper a Toyota Yaris car worth $17‚000 and cash prize of $500. In this case the amount that Tom received from His full time job as a garbage collector was an ordinary income. Factors that indicated it was income were : * It was periodic
Premium Full-time American football Player
Zulfatah Arif SCM-019741 Work Psychology in Communication‚ Writing and Reporting COM 2153 Mr Haji Adenan Case Studies An Unmotivated Building Inspector Case Study By: Zulfatah Arif 1) Review the motivation theories discussed in this chapter. How would each one describe and explain the problems with Simon Lucas’s motivation? The theories that would be relevant to the problems with Simon Lucas’ motivation would be the McClelland’s Need Theory and Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory.
Premium Motivation Management Scientific method
neutral third party or panel of experts hears a dispute and imposes a resolution of the parties” (Miller & Jentz‚ 2008‚ p.50). However‚ both parties must sign and agree to the above statement for it to be acknowledged as a legal judgment. In the case of Thomas Baker and Osborne Development Corporation it gets a little bit more involved. For starters‚ Osborne Development purchased the home warranty program administered by Home Buyers Warranty and signed the agreement of arbitration with them.
Premium Appeal Arbitration Dispute resolution
LGEAL PERSONALITY Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows a minority shareholder to bring a claim on behalf
Premium
Chapter 2 Donoghue v Stevenson p.45 Donoghue found a snail in the ginger beer and got shocked. She sued Stevenson‚ the manufacture. Manufacturer owed a duty of care to customers. Neighbour test.Grant v Australian Knitting Mills p.48 Dr Grant suffered dermatitis because of the sulphites on the surface of the underwear manufactured by AKM. AKM owed a duty of care in the production of the underwear not to cause injury to Grant. McPhersons v Eaton p.49 Eaton died from the exposure to asbestos
Premium Contract Tort
Case Study 1 Ebbers vs. Central Apartments Ltd. In this case Central Apartments Ltd has borrowed $800‚000 from exchange bank and secured the loan by a five year mortgage on the apartment building. Since the bank required additional security the president of the corporation at the time named Ebbers personally signed the guarantee. This makes Ebbers the guarantor and responsible for the debt if the principle debtor‚ Central Apartments Ltd‚ should default in the payment of their debt. Ebbers who
Premium Money Debt Loan
Labor Law Analysis: Article 41 of the extension of working hours [2011-05-31] promulgated time [source] [section] [Keyword] labor law Shiyi work longer hours than workers resolve labor laws need not be negotiated Article 41 requires the employer as a result of production and management‚ after consultation with the trade unions and workers can extend the working time‚ generally can not be more than one hour a day; for special reasons need to extend the working hours‚ the protection of the health conditions
Premium Working time Employment Employment compensation
NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY BANGALORE M.B.L. PART – I CONTRACT LAWS Important Case Laws 1. Balfour v. Balfour [(1919) 2 KB 571] Mr. Balfour promised to send £ 30 every month. Mr. Balfour did not send the money Mrs. Balfour sought to recover the promise money in the court of law. Whether a promise of domestic nature between a husband & wife could be binding? Held that‚ the promise between the parties was not intended by them to be legally binding. Hence‚ Mrs. Balfour could not
Premium Contract
Jim Jones and Bob Black * Jim Jones checked Bob Black during a hockey game * Bob Black slashed Jim Jones on the back of the neck with the hockey stick opening a gash * Jim Jones threatened Bob Black during the hockey game * Jim Jones asked Bob Black to step outside and fight him when he later ran into him * Jim Jones sustained severe neck damage from Bob Black * Jim Jones had turned down a $50 000 hockey contract to finish school‚ but was planning on turning pro next year
Premium Contract Tort
State of Utah v. Travis Dee Timmermann FACTS: In the early morning of June 30‚ 2007‚ the Timmeran’s neighbor heard a woman screaming “stop it!” and “help me!” Around 7:00 am‚ the neighbor notified the police. Officer Mclelland asked Mrs. Timmeran to fill out a witness statement. In her three page statement‚ Mrs. Timmeran wrote that Mr. Timmeran repeatedly to hit her and force her to have intercourse. Another police officer asked her to submit to a sexual assault examination at the hospital. At
Premium Police Testimony Evidence law