to identify a person who has become an agent “authorized by law.” Id. The court defined an agent authorized by appointment as one who has received specific authorization to receive service of process by his principal by means such as a contract. Id. at ¶14‚ 814 P.2d at 494. The Court noted that general agency is insufficient to establish that a person has been authorized by appointment. The Court went on to define an agent authorized by law as one who has been authorized by legislative enactment to
Premium Service of process Civil procedure
1: Boise‚ ID & Surrounding Areas‚ family law - http://www.familylawattorneyboise.com/family_law.html If you’re facing a family dispute‚ you may benefit receiving an objective overview of your case from the Law Office Of Margery W. Smith. I undertake a wide range of family law cases in Boise and in nearby communities. Whether you’re seeking child custody or your ex-spouse is refusing to pay court-ordered child support‚ I can tell you which child support laws apply to you. I can advise you on the process
Premium Ethics Law Lawyer
Page 1: Pinal and Maricopa Counties & Surrounding Areas‚ Criminal Law - http://www.lawofficetucsonaz.com/criminal_law.html If you’ve been charged with a crime in Tucson‚ AZ‚ you may want to know how you can minimize legal damage and avoid a criminal record. When you want to protect yourself and need legal representation‚ consider coming to the Law Office of Donielle Wright. I could analyze your criminal law case and help you understand your constitutional rights. Here to Defend You My goal is
Premium Crime Criminal law Criminal justice
Case Jonathan‚ a moneylender makes a loan of $1‚000 to Sheba on Sheba’s representation that she is 19 years old. Sheba is in fact 17 years old. She enrolled for diploma course with a private college for $500‚ spent $200 on a holiday‚ and the balance of $300 on a mini hi-fi set. She now refuses to pay Jonathan. In this case‚ we are acting for Jonathan (plaintiff). Jonathan sues Sheba (defendant) because of free consent and capacity. Free consent that we talk is about misrepresentation whereas capacity
Premium Contract Contract law
Law and Policy Case Study Bradley L. Hardman UMUC What does the word policy mean to you? In this study there will be a clear definition of the word and what it means to the company. After that is clearly defined‚ the next topics will be regulations and laws. Those three will cover legal environment and lead into a look at the impact the legal environment has on an organization. The final area to address is confidentiality‚ integrity‚ and availability of
Premium Law Common law Supreme Court of the United States
March 15‚ 2010 Issues: 1.Whether petitioner is doing or transacting business in the Philippines in contemplation of the law and established jurisprudence; 2.Whether respondent is estopped from invoking the defense that petitioner has no legal capacity to sue in the Philippines; Facts: Petitioner Cargill‚ Inc. (petitioner) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware‚ United States of America. Petitioner and Northern Mindanao Corporation (NMC) executed a contract
Premium Corporation Jurisdiction Legal terms
introduced in this case. Mr. Good put up an article on The Best Daily saying that he would share half of the advertising cost for anyone who places an advertisement in Best Daily with the intention of ‘initiating major legal response to raise climate change consciousness of the people of Hong Kong’. Our client‚ Mr. Concern who responded to Mr. Good’s offer‚ placed advertisements in 15 newspapers expressing ‘support for social reform for the protection of environment’. This case arises when Mr. Concern
Premium Contract
Case Analysis Puran Lal Sah versus State of UP Submitted by – Aseem Agarwal (12PGPIM04) Nitin Gupta (12PGPIM21) Rahul Jain (12PGPIM24) Saumitra Das (12PGPIM28) Nishant Shah (12PGPIM29) Supreme Court of India Puran Lal Sah vs State Of U.P on 21 January‚ 1971 Equivalent citations: 1971 AIR 712‚ 1971 SCR (3) 469 Bench: Reddy‚ P Jaganmohan PETITIONER: PURAN LAL SAH Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF U.P. DATE OF JUDGMENT 21/01/1971 BENCH: REDDY‚ P. JAGANMOHAN BENCH: REDDY
Premium Contract
TAYAG v BENGUET CONSOLIDATED‚ INC. Facts: In this case there was an order issued by the CFI of Manila compelling the domiciliary administrator of the Trust Company of New York to surrender to the ancillary administrator in the Philippines the stock certificates owned by the deceased Idonah Perkins to satisfy the legitimate claims of local creditors. However‚ such company challenged the said order invoking some provisions of its by-laws concerning procedures to be followed in surrendering a stock
Premium Corporation Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
According to the Australian Constitution‚ the power to make laws vested in the parliament ‚ whilst the power to interpret laws and to judge whether they apply in individual cases‚ vested in the High Court and other federal courts. In fact‚ one of the major function of the high court is to interpret the Constitution. For instance‚ the High Court of Australia may rule a law to be unconstitutional‚ that is beyond the power of parliament to make‚ and therefore of no effect. Such a circumstance would
Premium Separation of powers Law Constitution