Cuong Khong Bill Tennyson/ Business Law January 24‚ 2013 BRIEFING CASES… COMMONWEALTH v. BERGGREN 398 Mass. 338 (1986) Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts‚ Barnstable. May 6‚ 1986. August 26‚ 1986. ============================================================================ FACTS: On March 29‚ 1983‚ about 8:28 P.M.‚ Patrolman Michael Aselton of the Barnstable police department was on radar duty at Old Stage Road in Centerville. He saw the defendant’s motorcycle speed by him and commenced
Premium Jury Crime Court
Brandy Wayne Management Practices & Policies Case: The Law Offices of Jeter‚ Jackson‚ Guidry and Boyer January 20‚ 2013 The issues that are presented in this case study are not uncommon problems that happen in the working environment. It was clear from the case that the partners in the law firm worked from a style of collaboration and meeting to understand the needs of their employees. However‚ their growth left them needing someone to take over the day to day‚ yet important operations
Premium Leadership
1. The fact of the case Respondent (Schmidt) was a consulting engineer for the appellant company (Kepong Prospecting Ltd). The appellant company was the holders of certain mining leases in respect of deposits of iron ore. They did not work these deposits themselves but allowed them to be worked on tribute by another company named Kepong Mines Ltd. Their business in practice would seem to be confined to collecting the tribute and distributing it to their shareholders after making arrangements
Premium Civil procedure Money Appeal
Please answer the questions posed at the end of each case study in essay form. Each essay will be judged on your capacity to present strong‚ logical discussions that support your conclusions. Case study 1 Members of Students for Fair Tuition (SFT) decide to protest rising tuition costs at Gigantic State University (GSU) by taking over Dunfee Hall‚ the location of GSU president Dalton Chandler’s office. As they storm into the reception area of Chandler’s office suite‚ shouting “Down with
Premium Tort law Tort
Title and Citation Mark Koding v. Public Prosecutor [1982] 2 MLJ 120 Facts On 11 October 1978‚ the Accused‚ Mark Koding‚ a lawyer and member of the Dewan Rakyat made a speech in Parliament which was thought to be seditious. He was subsequently charged with committing an offence under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act. Issues 1. Whether‚ as a Member of Parliament (MP)‚ the Accused’s right of free speech in Parliament‚ given by sections 3 and 8 of the Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers)
Premium United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution Constitution
of personal privacy‚ then a court will order disclosure. See Ray. Even still‚ the requested information must shed light on the agency’s performance of it’s statutory duties. See Ray. This is also referred to as the “central-purpose” doctrine. See Law Review. Meaning‚ does
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Assignement 1 contracts Sayres v. Wheatland Group‚ L.L.C.‚ 79 Va. Cir. 504 (Va. Cir. Ct. 2009) CASE SUMMARYPROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff filed suit against defendants alleging that the contract for the construction and sale of a home that was at issue in this case was void‚ invalid‚ and unenforceable. Plaintiff also alleged that he was entitled to rescission and cancellation of the same contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the contract of sale. Plaintiff moved
Premium Contract
2000 CASE DIGESTS C R I M I N A L L A W SUMMARY OF DOCTRINES JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES Self-Defense The invocation of self-defense is an admission of the killing and its authorship. By this admission‚ the burden of proof shifts to the accused who must establish all elements of the justifying circumstance. The nature and number of wounds inflicted disprove the plea of self-defense because they demonstrate determined effort to kill and not just defend himself. (People v. Magayac
Premium Criminal law Rape
case study of company law I. Sarah’s business act and Richforth Ltd. constitution A company is a legal entity that is separate and distinct from its members and shareholders. When a company is legally formed‚ it has become ‘incorporated’ (Wild and Weinstein‚ 2009). As a legal person‚ a company must act in compliance with existing laws and in accordance with the terms of its constitution. Section 33 (1) of the CA 2006 provides: “The provisions of a company’s constitution bind the company
Premium Law United States Constitution Constitution
Business Law Case Study In the case presented‚ Biff Smith‚ the Chief of Police of the local department ordered a set of bicycles off of a local storeowner‚ Dirk Right. This was no simple order though‚ in fact Biff intended on starting a bike patrol unit within the local department. Biff went to Dirks Bicycle shop to place an order. The order was for five mountain bikes to be used for patrol so they had to be custom made in order to sport the police decals. Biff was very familiar with the Schwinn
Premium Management Strategic management Balance sheet