MGT 4123 Business Policy Case Analysis September 27‚ 2009 Student Name: Adam Gher Case Name: General Motors I. Mission To develop and grow a performance-based‚ world-class‚ competitive diversity supply base that will work with General Motors towards its goal of being the market leader in the automotive industry. G.M. is a multinational corporation engaged in socially responsible operations‚ worldwide. It is dedicated to provide products and services of such quality that our customers
Premium General Motors
TESLA Motors IPO June 2010 By: Brad Taylor Tesla Motors‚ Inc. was formed in 2003 to design and produce affordable EV’s (electric vehicle) and sell into the mainstream market place. The company is in the auto manufacturing industry and the consumer goods sector. To sustain its significant cash flow needs to support its heavy research and development spending and growing infrastructure needs (dealerships)‚ the company completed a public offering in June of 2010 where it sold 13.3 M shares
Premium Stock market Initial public offering Stock
ultrasonic motor INTRODUCTION All of us know that motor is a machine which produces or imparts motion‚ or in detail it is an arrangement of coils and magnets that converts electric energy into mechanical energy and ultrasonic motors are the next generation motors. In 1980‚the world’s first ultrasonic motor was invented which utilizes the piezoelectric effect in the ultrasonic frequency range to provide its motive force resulting in a motor with unusually good low speed‚ high torque
Premium Electric motor Wave Magnetic field
Tesla Motors Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction Chapter 4 2. Motivation 4 3. Research question and Sub questions 4 4. Interpretation 4 5. Scope/Delimitation 5 6. Methodology 6 6.1 Project type 6 6.2 Method 7 6.3 Theories and models used 7 6.4 Data collection 10 6.5 Structure 11 6.6 Critisium sources 11 7. Analysis 12 Part 1 12 7.1 Sub question 1 12 7.2 Sub question
Premium Electric car Tesla Roadster Strategic management
The two legal systems in question are the adversary system‚ most commonly practiced in the United States‚ and the civil law system‚ also referred to as the inquisitorial system‚ most commonly practiced in European countries. Both systems have the same goal; to find the truth. However‚ each system has a very different path to justice. The adversarial system implies that two parties assume opposite positions in debating the guilt or innocence of an individual. In this scenario‚ the judge is required
Premium Common law Jury
Case Study 1 Ebbers vs. Central Apartments Ltd. In this case Central Apartments Ltd has borrowed $800‚000 from exchange bank and secured the loan by a five year mortgage on the apartment building. Since the bank required additional security the president of the corporation at the time named Ebbers personally signed the guarantee. This makes Ebbers the guarantor and responsible for the debt if the principle debtor‚ Central Apartments Ltd‚ should default in the payment of their debt. Ebbers who
Premium Money Debt Loan
DISCUSSION The present study was undertaken to estimate the specificity‚ sensitivity and predictive validity of measurements obtained with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for evaluation of preterm high risk infants. The present study included two scales i.e. the Alberta infant motor scale and the Peabody developmental motor scale – 2 (PDMS – 2) on high risk infants at 3 months‚ 6 months and 12 months of age. For the purpose of comparing the AIMS scale‚ the PDMS -2 scale was used as the gold
Premium Positive predictive value Negative predictive value Sensitivity and specificity
FORD MOTOR COMPANY Written Case Report F.B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As director of Supply Chain Systems‚ I have decided to implement the new supply chain strategy of Virtual Integration‚ and model its supply chain after companies like Dell. Although there are several key differences between the companies‚ Dell’s direct business approach can be applied to every facet of Ford’s operation. Special care will need to be taken to address the unique dependency of our custom “tier- one” suppliers. A modification
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain Ford Motor Company
THE HUMAN RESOURCE ASPECT Change‚ in any organization is routed through it’s Human Resource Department. Thereare always disgruntled employees who complain that change has adversely affected them.There are employees who believe in status Quo and believe that if a system is working‚there is no point in changing it. Escorts going out and Yamaha coming in was a change that influenced each other andevery employee working on all levels. Strangely though‚ the resistance to this majorchange and to all
Premium Management
Contract Law Cases The Offer Meeting of minds: Clarke v Earl of Dunraven and Mount Earl: Yacht races. Letters sent in Communication (in writing‚ speech and conduct): Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co: pay back 100 if you get influenza. Deposit 1000 The Acceptance: Strictly in response to
Premium Contract