NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY Spring 2013 EXPERIMENT Maximum Power Transfer Theorem Course: EEE 141 Section: 1 Faculty: MAA Instructor: RKK Date of performance: 23rd March 2013 Date of submission: 25th March 2013 Group – 6 |# |Name |ID | |1 |Md. Al Kaiser |1230032043
Premium Resistor
CASE STUDY NO. 1 The Wilshire Public library has received funding from the Wilshire country commissionaires to upgrade its desktop computers and servers. Currently‚ they are using an old Windows NT server to catalogue library holdings. Also there are Windows 98 computers that the librarians use in their offices. Library patrons use Windows 95 and Windows 98 computers within the library to access the catalogue of holdings electronically (or they use the old card catalogue‚ which is cards
Premium Operating system Microsoft Windows Windows Vista
Changing the Face at the Busiest Airport in the World through Project Management Refurbishing Heathrow Airport Terminal 1‚ On Time‚ On Budget‚ With No Disruptions to Travelling Public Background: Dated and In Need of a Revamp‚ But It has to be Business as Usual... BAA Airports Ltd. was tasked with the refurbishment of Terminal 1‚ a 40-year-old building within Heathrow Airport‚ the busiest international airport in the world‚ whilst constantly keeping the terminal open to the 20 million annual travellers
Premium Project management Management London Heathrow Airport
MODULE: Project Management: Leading‚ Creating‚ Implementing and Improving (M1) CASE: Multi Projects Inc. DUE DATE: 17 June 2014 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary This submission identifies the various challenges portrayed in the case study. It presents an evaluation of these challenges and seeks to identify the causes which led to the challenges. Multi Projects Inc. is an organization that operates in a Matrix-type Organization but does not effectively and efficiently utilize
Premium Project management Management
Project Management Institute Case Studies in Project Management The Glasgow Science Centre Tower Project Edited by: Frank T. Anbari‚ PhD‚ PMP The George Washington University Frank T. Anbari‚ PhD‚ PMP Young Hoon Kwak‚ PhD Oksana Chernyaeva‚ MSPM Tina Spector‚ MSPM Albert H. Wu This case study was originally prepared as part of Project Management Applications‚ the capstone course of the Master of Science in Project Management at The George Washington University‚ by the graduating students listed
Premium Project management
Capstone Project Problem/Issue The Bulk Sale Unit is responsible for the review of State tax records and collection of taxes for the selling party in a business sale‚ assignment or transfer transaction. Our objective is to ensure the seller is compliant on all State taxes and collect taxes necessary as a result of the transaction. Our Unit issues a letter to the purchaser in the transaction at the conclusion of our review and collection process so that they may proceed with the transaction without
Premium Management Employment Customer service
TEMPLATE FOR PROJECT BRIEF PRINCE 2 Method Conia: Orange Deivis & Joey: Black Noura: Green [PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT BRIEF:] [It is essential to obtain a clear view of the final objective(s) and outcome‚ as well as the constraints and assumptions that impact on those responsible for the project. A properly constructed Project Mandate will help but as the creation of the Project Mandate is outside the control of the Project Manager‚ the Project Brief is
Premium Project management Sales
The first indication of an ethical issue in development is when Dr. Petrov asks Dr. Hawkins to donate soon-to-expire or expired medications to Project Assist. A clear interpersonal tension is developing between Dr. Petrov and the pharmacist‚ especially since medications for the project is in short supply and the pharmacy disposes of them anyway. Furthermore‚ the pharmacist and doctor are aware of hospital policies and FDA laws in regards to the disposal and donation of drugs. Dr. Hawkins is in an
Premium Medicine Ethics Physician
PROJECT FIRECRACKER CASE STUDY Eva Neugebauer – 2060 Federica Picozzi – 1982 Francisca Lopes Pinto – 2048 Konstantin Gusev – 2018 WHY DID THE PROJECT FAIL? The project failed due to three main reasons that reinforced the negative impact of one another: Poor communication There was a poor coordination between individuals. One example was the situation where Waldo and Wolinski took decisions individually without consulting the other members. In fact‚ the first informed Jeff that he was changing
Premium Project management Management
Appendix C Additional Running Cases INTRODUCTION These cases are provided here on the companion Web site as additions to the four running cases in Appendix C of the text. Each running case includes five partsinitiating‚ planning‚ executing‚ controlling‚ and closingwith scenario-based information and several tasks to complete under each part. Several of the tasks involve using templates provided in Appendix D and on this companion Web site. Table D-1 on page 595 of the text summarizes the templates
Premium Project management