Facts: In the Case of Blackshades v. the United States‚ defendant Alex Yucel‚ a citizen of Sweden‚ was charged with computer hacking using the malware‚ “RAT‚” under his company called Blackshades. Since he is the founder of the Blackshades‚ “Rat” had sold the malicious software to 6‚000 customers. Blackshades is a malware which includes a remote tool‚ called “RAT.” With the malware‚ it enables it to control the victims’ computers. According to the plaintiff‚ the federal government‚ Blackshades
Premium Computer security Security Computer
A study evaluating external factors in T20 cricket by Mohammed Saeed B.Sc. (Hons) Nottingham Trent University‚ 2013 a dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Financial Mathematics in the Department of Science and Technology Abstract With the introduction of Twenty20 (T20) cricket‚ teams around the world have had to adapt to different strategies. Bowling and batting styles have changed‚ from
Premium Cricket
Assignment 026‚ Task B‚ Question 1: Why is it important to safeguard children and young people? Without providing the service of safeguarding for children and young people who are not developed enough to do it for themselves‚ their future could be negatively affected. If they were to be affected by an event such as abuse‚ and there is no safeguarding in place‚ this could carry on and seriously affect their physical and emotional development. This could mean they fall behind with developmental milestones
Premium Childhood Child Children Act 1989
conclusion. The case Heien v. North Carolina came about on April 29‚ 2010 when an officer started “following a suspicious vehicle‚ Sergeant Matt Darisse noticed that only one of the vehicle’s brake lights was working and pulled the driver over. While issuing a warning ticket for the broken brake light‚ Darisse became suspicious of the actions of the two occupants and their answers to his questions. Petitioner Nicholas Brady Heien‚ the car’s owner‚ gave Darisse consent to search the vehicle. Darisse
Premium Appellate court Supreme court Appeal
person is required to received in the workplace. The code has the ability to allow and disallow certain charges based on discrimination due to the nature of the job. As these following cases will illustrate‚ the Human Rights Code is not a piece of legislation that favors neither the individual nor the employer. These cases show how the Human Rights code is used to protect against discrimination in relation the health and safety‚ with special consideration on who is and is not eligible for compensation
Premium Human rights Law Occupational safety and health
I believe Stogner v. California (2003) favors the offender’s rights because the offender escaped justice due to passage of time. In some cases‚ I believe passage of time could be acceptable‚ but in cases of serious personal and psychological injury‚ I do not believe passage of time should be such a factor. When the law regarding sexual assault was written‚ these types of crimes did not carry the penalties and time limitations that they do now. I venture to say‚ it was not viewed as serious as it
Premium Crime Police Criminal justice
important supreme court decisions occurred‚ the Brown v. Board of Education which made segregation in public schools were unconstitutional. Contradicting the Plessy v. Ferguson court decision‚ this court case was a big step towards a less racist country. ¬¬¬¬As the Civil Rights Movement continued throughout the 1950s and 1960s‚ many others also struggled for justice; including women‚ farmers‚ and the LGBTQ community. The decision of the case ultimately paved the way for a new way of justice for Americans
Premium Brown v. Board of Education African American Racial segregation
4.2 Simultaneous Proceedings under DRT and SARFAESI - 4.2.1 Transcore Vs Union of India – Facts- An Original Application (O.A.) was filed by Indian Overseas Bank (Bank) before the DRT‚ Chennai for recovery of dues from M/s Transcore (T) and to bring the properties to sell. The claim was disputed. Later on‚ a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act was issued vide which T was called upon to repay the amount due together with interest within sixty days. T failed to repay the amount. The
Premium Real estate Legal terms
Magna Verde was served by mail and made a special appearance in Oklahoma state court to argue that Oklahoma does not have personal jurisdiction over it. The main argument is that does Oklahoma have jurisdiction over Magna Verde Corporation? Analysis A court is required to use long-arm jurisdiction over persons and businesses in another State when a civil wrong is committed within a State; when there is a contract in the State or a contract affects the State and when a business is transacted
Premium Cartel Sherman Antitrust Act Trust
Sean M. Staffing the Organization Fall 2010 Dr. Pell 3/20/11 Case Study: “Making Job Offer” A top candidate Jane Roberts and Betts Cook are 2 finalists for Manager vacancy at one of Clean Car Care’s North Side Facility. Arlan Autospritz is strongly considering to extending an offer to Jane Roberts and Jane is strongly considering Arlan’s offer upon pending terms & conditions. Jane has the right experience for the position but the other candidate Betts Cook has stronger KSAO’s. Jane is up for promotion
Premium Employment Confidentiality