University of Phoenix Material Case Study Analysis Peer Review Form Writer’s Name Joseph Wiggins Reviewer’s Name Christi Cothran 1 Reviewer question: What is the author’s thesis? Stress is an emotion that a worker will experience in the workplace on many occasions. 2 Reviewer question: Is the thesis clearly stated? If not‚ how would you help the writer restate it? I think Joseph could have expounded on his thesis a little more to provide a hint to the problems at hand and possible
Premium Case study Writing Scientific method
Please put “Peer Review” at the top of your posting so I will see it and give you credit for it when I am grading. List your peer’s name. Answer: What was your favorite part of her/his comments? Did he/she cite the textbook if appropriate? Evaluate his/her use of online resources. (Check the website links to see if the links work and are on topic. Did your peer explain how the website was relevant to the discussion topic?) Evaluate the
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of speech United States Constitution
Formal Exploratory Essay Peer Review Form Introduction [worth 10%] Does the introduction meet all of the following criteria: (1) establishes the question’s significance‚ (2) tells why the writer is interested in the topic‚ and (3) presents relevant background information about the topic‚ and (4) states a research question? Any comments/suggestions for improvement? Body Paragraphs [worth 40%] Do the body paragraphs (1) consist of at least 5 body paragraphs that examine 5 different
Premium Critical thinking Writing Scientific method
------------------------------------------------- Top of Form Bottom of Form Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Copy and paste the completed review into your reply to the post containing the assigned draft. Do not post your review as an attachment. Name of the Draft’s Author: Kelsey Johnson Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Premium Writing Peer review
ENGL 111 English Composition Statewide Online Course Principles of Peer Review Concerns about Peer Review and How to Handle Them In this class‚ you will be asked to review one another’s writing as a regular‚ graded assignment. You will be provided with a series of questions to guide you as you read and respond to one another’s drafts. In this handout‚ we address some general concerns many students have about reviewing classmates’ work. If you have these concerns‚ you are not alone. The
Premium Peer review Internet Conscription in the United States
RUBRIC – PEER EVALUATION (ASSIGNMENT #4) STUDENT NAME (completing the peer evaluation):__________________________ Please review the following criteria and assign a grade to each of your peers within your group. There are 5 criteria worth a maximum of one mark each. This peer evaluation is confidential AND must be submitted to the instructor on the date of your presentation. Criteria 1 mark 0.5 mark 0 mark Attendance Attends all meetings. Misses one meeting. Misses more than one meeting. Role within
Premium Demonstration Decision making Communication
to me to accept these comments‚ make changes‚ and continue to excel. The second thing that this Peer review has allowed me to realize is that everyone has a unique and helpful perspective from which they critique work‚ this allows me to make my work appeal everyone from all angles‚ and it also broadens my imagination hearing all these different‚ yet equally interesting points. Though the peer review works just fine the way it is currently setup‚ I feel that making slight changes will allow for
Premium The Work
Peer Review Michael J DeVry University Considering the most integral part of one’s paper‚ the data and information provided has to be well founded. That is why the research portion is the most important part. Anyone‚ can form an opinion‚ in which in the individual’s point of view might drown out the factual evidence. Secondly‚ what good is legitimate factual information‚ if it is interpreted badly. Therefore‚ one must have an open mind‚ and see all sides of the topic before making irrational
Premium Peer review
Shantell’s paper for the most part was easy to follow and got the point across about Valero Energy Corporation. One thing I noticed was a couple sentences needed words deleted or added in order to make more sense. There were some also some APA format issues that needed to be addressed. Overall‚ the paper was informative about the future of Valero as well as the making sure customer needs are addresses. Especially in the world we live in it is important to address customer needs as well as environmental
Premium IP address
The peer-reviewed science article “Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders” looks into discovering a more conclusive test of mirror neuron theory (MNS) on autism involving socio-emotional tasks in sample children with and without autism to show MNS activity. It was hypothesized that abnormal MNS functioning would be present during action imitation and observation in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The study used a pool
Premium Brain Neuroscience Autism