Dylan sanders JS 143 Professor Peterson August 26th‚ 2013 Brief #1 McDonald vs. City of Chicago 1) CITATION: McDonald V. City of Chicago‚ III.‚ 130 S. Ct. 3020- Supreme Court 2010 2) Facts: Otis McDonald‚ a Chicago resident‚ tried to purchase a handgun for the purpose of protecting his home and body but was denied due to a Chicago city ordinance that banned the possession of personal handguns. McDonald filed suit against the city of Chicago under the claim that the 2nd amendment of the U
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Moreover‚ as the case was addressed in many different areas within this essay the information that was gathered later introduced the procedural posture in the event of this case. The procedural posture of this case was clarifying the rights people‚ or minorities other than Caucasian in the South have‚ and how this case was decided. For instance‚ all African American children can finally go to a school in which they are treated equally‚ and receive the best education necessary in developing their
Premium African American Brown v. Board of Education Racial segregation
Jenny vs. Angie and Richard Part A: 1. Introduction to the case Following notations are used for simplicity of explanation: Hereafter‚ Jenny will be referred to as the Plaintiff; Angie to be referred to as defendant 1; Richard to be referred to as defendant 2. The plaintiff here received some money as a result of a golden-handshake after deciding to retire. The total sum of which is $500‚ 000‚ which she intends to invest in real-estate. Upon being approached by defendant 1 with a proposal of "Sure-thing
Premium Law Jury Pleading
com/p/personal_finance/portfolio/the_loyalty_program_battle_ground_4hwbD00hKdMWP6verYnLpN Madeleine Ross(2012‚ 7 Dec). Coles vs Woolworths: Who ’s winning?. Bandt.com.au. Retrieved 11 July 2012 from http://www.bandt.com.au/features/coles-vs-woolworths-the-battle-of-the-mega-marts http://wps.pearsoned.com.au/au_be_kotler_mktgmgt_1/85/21977/5626312.cw/-/5626314/index.html References của Case Coles Group. (2007). Welcome to Coles Group Limited. 1 November 2007‚ from
Premium Marketing Management Retailing
Running head: SUDSON VS LETISHA Sudson VS Letisha John W Small Argosy University Abstract “A contract is simply a legally binding agreement between parties to do or not do something.”(WebLocator‚ 2011) Many things in today’s society have terms‚ conditions‚ and disclaimers. If a person is entering into an agreement be it: new software‚ cell phone service‚ home security service‚ garbage pickup‚ a financial agreement; i.e. to purchase a house‚ a car‚ a boat‚ a new credit card‚ student loans
Premium Contract Common law Law
NEGLIGENCE CASE Kathy Pagan vs. Dr. Rouchdi Rifai On June 4‚ 2009‚ 40 year old Kathy Pagan underwent an abdominoplasty and liposuction of the abdominal flap‚ at Dr. Rouchdi Rifai’s office in Jackson‚ MI. She experiences problems from the surgery right from the start. She had “dark-colored drainage‚ clots‚ and painful burning sensations and continued to report issues‚ according to her complaint‚ first filed in 2011.” She went to Dr. Rifai office where he cleaned the wound area without anesthesia
Premium Surgery Medicine Injury
CASE STUDY FEDEX VS UPS VS HYDER MUNAVER 29-MAR-05 The Introduction: In today’s’ fast moving world delivery of packages‚ parcels‚ documents‚ goods in a timely and guaranteed manner is of absolute importance. With the fast moving trend of online businesses‚ auctions etc.. The need for fast and reliable package delivery is growing. The logistics industry has received globally‚ a lot of publicity regarding the industry’s attitudes on‚ and actions in‚ corporate responsibility issues. The different
Premium
In lecture we discovered that the precedent adopted in the State vs. Pendergrass case was Stare Decisis‚ which stands for “stand by what has been decided”. Stare Decisis‚ in further detail‚ means when determining the outcome of a court decision‚ judges look at similar cases dealt with in the past to help determine the outcome of the case presented. Another precedent that could be appropriate for this case is the maintenance of hierarchical relationships. Thinking that children need discipline is
Premium Education Teacher School
CASE STUDY STATE OF U.P VS. ALLIED CONSTRUCTIONS ABHINAV SINGH 2010CEX 5536 State of U.P vs. Allied Constructions‚ 2003(3) Arb. LR 106 (SC) The State of U.P and Allied Constructions have entered into contract of construction of bridgecum-fall at Munda Khera Scape at the estimated cost of Rs. 37.2 lakhs. While the work was in progress‚ the work area was flooded in the night of August 25 and 26‚ 1991. Contractor herein filed a claim on account of loss sustained by him due to flooding of the
Premium Contract United States Force majeure
committees with the case Electromation‚ Inc. vs NLRB. With this act organizations must be careful with creating employee committees that could otherwise be deemed unlawful. They must avoid allowing any of the management team to direct or influence the work of the committee‚ as well as members of the committee are not allowed to give the impression that they represent the views of their fellow coworkers. Both of these examples took place in the Electromation‚ Inc. vx NLRB case and are now considered
Premium Employment Trade union Collective bargaining