may need to reach their goal of a career. Despite bearing some minor similarities‚ the differences between photography and real estate associate are clear. Although wanting to be photographer or a real estate sales associate do sound like they are two very different
Premium Business Academic degree Sales
Hildreth v. Tidewater Equipment Co. Summary John Hildreth was the sole shareholder‚ director‚ and officer HCE‚ Inc‚ a corporation in New Jersey. HCE-NJ began to do business in Maryland in early 1997. According to the Maryland code‚ it is required for foreign corporations to register with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation before doing intrastate business in Maryland‚ and it is required to have a resident agent in Maryland. In February 1998‚ HCE-NJ rented equipment from Tidewater
Premium Corporation United States Virginia
Smith and Jones‚ P.A. 1234 Main Street New York‚ N.Y. 10000 December 13‚ 2013 Ms. Mary Jones 100 Florida Lane New York‚ N.Y. 1000 RE: Jones v. ABC Auto Company Dear Ms. Jones: Please be advised that the court has scheduled your case for a settlement conference to be held on Friday‚ December 27‚ 2013 at 9:30 a.m. The settlement conference will take place at the county courthouse located at 1050 Litigation Boulevard in New York. Mr. Smith has requested you contact us as soon as possible
Premium Law United States Appeal
1. Case Name‚ Citation‚ and Court Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall LEXIS 2826I (2008) The District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2. Key Facts A. Internet Solutions Corp. (ISC)‚ which operates employment recruiting and Internet advertising websites‚ has its principal place of business in Florida. B. Tabatha Marshall‚ a resident of the State of Washington‚ was sued by ISC for making false and defamatory statements on her website. C. Marshall filed a motion to dismiss asserting
Premium Appeal Civil procedure Jurisdiction
United Parcel Service‚ Inc.” case‚ Peggy Young was employed as a part-time delivery driver for UPS. Although all drivers were required to be able to lift items weighing up to 70 pounds as an essential function of their jobs‚ the plaintiff’s duties generally included carrying lighter
Premium Gender Employment Woman
CASE NAME: Commissioner of Police of Montserrat v Cavanaugh (Brian) CITATION: [2005] UKPC 28‚ 66 WIR 206‚ [2005] All ER (D) 110 (Jul) FACTS On 18 July 1995‚ the Soufriere Hills volcano on Montserrat became active. On 3 April 1996‚ by virtue of his powers under s 3 of the Leeward Islands (Emergency Powers) Order in Council 1959‚ SRO 2206 of 1959‚ the Governor declared that a state of public emergency existed and made the Emergency Powers Regulations 1996 (No 3)‚ SRO 26 of 1996‚ which were amended
Premium United States President of the United States United States Department of Homeland Security
si Basilan Estates‚ Inc vs CIR & CTA GR L-22492; Sept 5‚ 1967 Bengzon‚ J.P. Facts: 1. Basilan Estate‚ Inc. a Philippine corporation engaged in coconut industry filed in 1954 its income tax returns for 1953 and paid an income tax of P8‚028 2. On February 26‚ 1959‚ the Commissioner of Internal Revenue‚ assessed Basilan Estates‚ Inc a deficiency income tax of a. P3‚912 for 1953 and b. P86‚867.85 as 25% surtax on unreasonably accumulated profits as of 1953 pursuant to Section 25
Premium Depreciation Tax Taxation in the United States
Assignment #2 Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority Dr. Edward Sherbert HRM 510 May 5‚ 2013 What where the legal issues in this case? The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color‚ as well as national origin‚ sex‚ religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state‚ government‚ employment agencies‚ labor organizations and federal government jobs.
Premium United States Law Civil and political rights
ii. Hypothetical 2: Accident at the gun range—P v. DC Shooting Range FACTS: Plaintiff sues DC Shooting range‚ where he is a regular‚ for its failure to prevent X‚ a high-ranking member of the gun-owner’s association affiliated with DC Shooting‚ from entering the range with a gun despite under the influence of alcohol‚ causing him to carelessly handle his weapon and accidentally shooting Plaintiff’s arm. Plaintiff built his prima facie case by alleging that on the day of the incident‚ defendant’s
Premium Law Tort Tort law
Pat Employee‚ submits the following Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. INTRODUCTION This Court should grant the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment because this Court should apply the law of East Kansas. This case involves a conflict of law issue because West Kansas’s law provides that worker’s compensation is the exclusive remedy for employees‚ who are victims of intentional torts‚ while East Kansas says that worker’s compensation is not the exclusive remedy
Premium Conflict of laws Choice of law Jurisdiction