IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 81-1505 Transamerica Oil Corporation‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ v. Lynes‚ Inc. and Baker International Corporation‚ Defendants-Appellants. 723F.2d 758; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14288; 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1076 ------------------------------------------------- December 21‚ 1983 PROCEDURAL POSTURE Plaintiff brought suit under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to recover damages resulting from the breach of an
Premium Warranty Appeal Jury
Wunnicke case‚ in some circumstances a state discriminatory means regulation can survive a Dormant Commerce Clause challenge. In Maine v. Taylor‚ the Supreme Court upheld a Maine prohibition on the importation of live-baitfish for fear of parasites not common to Main fisheries. As the author of the majority opinion of this case‚ Justice Blackmun wrote that discriminatory laws may be upheld only if they serve “legitimate
Premium Vaccine Vaccination Immune system
in any school building‚ on school grounds‚ in any school vehicle or at any school-sponsored activity.4” .The image Renville provided clearly violates the school guidelines and does not pass the “Tinker Test”‚ therefore the ruling delivered in Tinker v Des Moines independent Community School District does not apply to the supposed infringement on Renville’s freedom of speech
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution High school
What is green building? As the global climate warming‚ more and more people focus on building energy efficiency. There is more awareness that CO2 produced by building energy use is the main source of climate warming. Energy-saving buildings become inevitable trend of development‚ the green building also arises in time. Green building can be define as to the construction of the whole life cycle‚ for maximize resource conservation (epa.gov‚ 19/12/2012). It includes energy saving‚ land saving‚ water
Premium Global warming Ecology Natural environment
younger workers due to stereotypes surrounding older workers’ productivity and cost. In case of Zimpfer V. Palm Beach County case‚ Mr. Bryce Zimpfer applied for the position of employee relations manager. However‚ the department filled the position with Mr. Brad Merriman‚ aged 33. Although Brad had less experience than Bryce‚ he was appointed as the new relations manager. Nonetheless‚ this is a case of age based discrimination. Since Brad has
Premium
Company Information Name :: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters‚ Keurig Coffee Website :: www.greenmountaincoffee.com‚ www.gmcr.com‚ www.keurig.com Industry :: Processed & Packaged Goods- Coffee Makers Background & History Green Mountain Coffee Roasters‚ Inc. (GMCR) was founded in 1981 as a small café and combined with Keurig in 2006 (About GMCR‚ 2004-2009). GMCR produces specialty coffee and coffee makers; Keurig is the maker of a single cup coffee maker as well as specialty teas and coffees
Premium Coffee
Contribution Required Of Excess Insurer Where It Did Not Consent To Settlement In February‚ the California Court of Appeal ruled in Doe Run Resources Corp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York that an excess insurer did not have to contribute to the settlement where the insured failed to obtain its consent before signing the settlement agreement. The case involved a complaint filed in 2001 by residents of Herculaneum‚ Missouri alleging that the defendant mining-company‚ Doe Run’s‚ lead and cadium smelting
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Law
Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor‚ people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result‚ Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19‚ 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps‚ regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu‚ a Japanese American citizen‚ refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore‚ he was convicted
Premium United States World War II President of the United States
Wisconsin v. Yoder‚ 406 U.S. 205 (1972)‚ is the case in which the United States Supreme Court found that Amish children could not be placed under compulsory education past 8th grade‚ as it violated their fundamental right to freedom of religion. Three Amish students from three different families stopped attending New Glarus High School in the New Glarus‚ Wisconsin school district at the end of the eighth grade‚ all due to their religious beliefs. The three families were represented by Jonas
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
In this case‚ former sales managers for State Room had accused the company of not paying them for the extra duties undertaken. The court held that these employees had no authority when it comes to the setting pieces or even enters into contracts unless the management has negotiated the favorable terms (Breger & Edles‚ 2015). The court further decided to rely on a previous decision to arrive at the new decision. The case under reference was Reich v John Alden Life Insurance Co
Premium Fair Labor Standards Act Overtime Working time