Goldsbrough Mort v Quinn A promise to hold an offer open for a time is not enforceable (as there is no consideration). BUT option contracts have consideration for the promise Mobil Oil Australia v Lyndel If the performance of a unilateral contract has commences the offeror can revoke it but there may (Depending on circumstances) be an implied ancillary (side) unilateral contract to not revoke it which you would be in breach of Stevenson‚ Jaques & Co v McLean Inquiry as to a method of payment is not a rejection
Premium Contract Contract law
A recent study shows that every three out of five adolescents will be bullied on a social media site and out of those five minors two will commit suicide. However there are those who believe social media has become a way for minors to express themselves. But is the price of someone’s life really worth a few likes and followers. Minors should not be allowed to use social media sites because they can be more destructive than positive when it comes to using them. In the past decade technology has
Premium Sociology Bullying Social media
2nd of feb CASES MALLIK V BCC: Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 is a leading English contract law and UK labour law case‚ which confirmed the existence of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in all contracts of employment. Facts: Mr Malik and Mr Mahmud both worked for the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. BCCI went insolvent due to massive fraud‚ connection with terrorists‚ money-laundering‚ extortion and a raft of other criminal
Premium Contract Breach of contract
and received some payments. The Government subsequently stopped its subsidy scheme and the Plaintiff sued the Government for subsidies it claimed it was due. Rules There was no contract. The statement made by the Commonwealth was not offered as consideration for the plaintiff buying the wool. The Court stated that in cases such as this: ‘… it is necessary‚ … that it should be made to appear that the statement or announcement which is relied on as a promise [here the subsidy statement] was really
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
a) The first contract should be between the Ramirez family and Majestic Developers‚ inc‚ as they are the parties involved. (b) The consideration on the Ramirez family side is their 250-acre farm and on Majestic Developers‚ inc the consideration is three million million dollars. (c) What should be included in the contract should be; the parties‚ (2) the price‚ (3) the subject matter of the contract‚ and (4) the time of performance of the contract‚ also the contract should address the small fence
Premium Tax Depreciation Taxation
DYJR7EAdvertisements of Bilateral Contracts Are Not Usually Offers Case Coelho Vs The Public Services Commission 1. Brief Facts/ Case Summary The applicant‚ Mr Meredith Coelho was a health inspector under the town Board Tanjung Malim and he applied for the post of Assistant Passport Officer in the Federation of Malaya Government Oversea Missions as advertised in the Malay Mail newspaper dated 1957. The terms and conditions of the selection are as stated below: * Serving Assistant passport
Premium Contract
The case scenario starts off by stating that two employees of the hospital engaged in an exclusive contract. Since Ortiz agreement was to provide services to individuals in rural communities it ended up lowering the fees for the anesthesiologist so he decided to renegotiate his contract with the hospital which breached his original contract between the two of them causing the anesthetist services with the hospital. In turn leading to a lawsuit filed sharing that there was a violation made regarding
Premium Health care Patient Health care provider
FACTS: SS/Alicante‚ belonging to Compania Transatlantica de Barcelona was transporting two locomotive boilers for the Manila Railroad Company. The equipment of the ship for discharging the heavy cargo was not strong enough to handle the boilers. Compania Transatlantica contracted the services of Atlantic gulf and Pacific Co.‚ which had the best equipment to lift the boilers out of the ship’s hold. When Alicante arrived in Manila‚ Atlantic company sent out its floating crane under the
Premium Contract
UcanB007 from liabilities. [pic] The foremost issue pertaining to this case is that of whether the terms of the License Agreement are part of the contract between Ah Siong and UcanB007‚ and hence the enforceability of the terms should Ah Siong decide to sue UcanB007 in contract for his losses. Due to the nature of this case being that of a shrink-wrap license agreement‚ there is contention regarding the point in time when the contract was formed‚ which clearly affects the incorporation of the terms and
Premium Contract
Technische Universität München Management Accounting -Case Study- Harvard Business Case Case Study: Owens & Minor Structure of the Case Study 1. O&M: Company Profile 2. Costing and Pricing at O&M 3. The Case 4. O&M‘s Proposal 5. Solution of the Case-Questions © Gunther Friedl – WS 11/12 Case Study: Owens & Minor Owens & Minor‚ Inc: Company Profile Headquarter: Mechanicsville‚ Virginia‚ U.S Revenue 2010: $ 8.12 billion Number of employees 2010: 4‚800 One of the leading distributors
Premium Pricing Costs Cost