The Corinthian Colleges‚ Inc. (CCI) which directed the Everest‚ Wyotech and Heald colleges and were all considered Private Postsecondary schools deceived their students by making them believe hollow promises that had no intentions of being true. They fabricated false job placement rates for students. The Corinthian Colleges declared bankruptcy after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) affirmed that students were being cheated and that the job prospects were only an advertisement to attract
Premium University Higher education College
Bush v. Gore‚ 531 U.S. 98 (2000)‚ is the United States Supreme Court decision that resolved the dispute surrounding the 2000 presidential election. Three days earlier‚ the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring. Eight days earlier‚ the Court unanimously decided the closely related case of Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board‚ 531 U.S. 70 (2000). In a per curiam decision‚ the Court ruled that there was an Equal Protection Clause violation in using different standards
Premium President of the United States United States Supreme Court of the United States
Details Uber Technologies Inc.‚ also better known as Uber‚ is the transportation mobile application company founded back in 2009 (Lashinsky‚ 2015) that specializes in transportation through their mobile platform which operate 24-hour-per-day and connect passengers and drivers (Pullen‚ 2014). It has since then grown into a well-known‚ successful‚ billion-dollar company worth over $50 billion net worth with 58 countries involve (Kim‚ 2015). The company revenues through hire service and presents something
Premium Marketing Mobile phone Strategic management
HUDGENS V NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AUGUST 13‚ 2009 DIANE SACHAROFF BMGT 281 SUMMER Our constitution gives us the right under the First Amendment to the Freedom of Speech. This seems like a fairly straight forward right‚ but what many don’t know is that the Constitution only guarantees our right to freedom of speech against abridgement by government‚ federal or state. (Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board‚ 424 U.S. 507 Lexis). In
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Wallace v. Jaffree How did the Three Branches of government respond to the social issues of freedom of religion based on Wallace v. Jaffree case? Name: Thao-My Bui Date: 11/4/2014 IB History of the American Word count: 1989 Table of Contents A. Plan of Investigation 3 B. Summary of evidence………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 C. Evaluation of Sources……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…6 D. Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Case 1: Acclaim Entertainment Capital Budgeting: Multiple Projects with Unequal Lives Acclaim Entertainment‚ Inc. is a mass marketer of interactive entertainment software whose games can be played on such well known video game systems as Nintendo and Sega. Some of their more successful games include Mortal Kombat I and II‚ NBA Jam I and II‚ Maximum Carnage‚ Virtual Bart (Simpson)‚ and NFL Quarterback. Acclaim has also obtained licenses from True Lies‚ Batman Forever‚ and Spiderman. The interactive
Premium Net present value Sony Computer Entertainment License
The KWETEY v. BOTCHWAY AND ANOTHER case explains the principle of “you cannot give what you do not have” which has its Latin as “Nemo dat quod non habet”. In this case‚ the bank‚ wanted to sell a boat that rightfully belonged to Kwetey and this was established by the court to be against the principle stated supra. The facts in Kwetey v Botchway are that the plaintiff had mortgaged his house to the Agricultural Development Bank (ADB) to secure a loan to replace a broken marine engine in a 40-footer
Premium Breach of contract Breach of contract Damages
The rule in Ryland’s v Fletcher was established in the case Rylands v Fletcher [1868]‚ decided by Blackburn J. In effect‚ it is a tort of strict liability “imposed upon a landowner who collects certain things on his land – a duty insurance against harm caused by their escape regardless of the owner’s fault”. The tort under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher is described as one of strict liability. This means that liability may be imposed on a party without finding of fault such as negligence. The plaintiff
Premium Tort Tort Complaint
COMES NOW Canterra Energy Corp. (“Canterra”)‚ and Avpro‚ Inc.‚ (“Avpro”) by and through their undersigned counsel‚ and files this Consent Motion to Extend Time to respond to 50NL’s Motion To Enforce Subpoena and Compel Production of Documents By Non-Party Avpro‚ Inc. pursuant to Md. Rule 1-204‚ and in support thereof states as follows: 1. This discovery dispute arises from an action pending in the District Court of Oklahoma County‚ Oklahoma‚ involving the contemplated—but ultimately unconsummated—sale
Premium Airline Southwest Airlines Avianca
official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion. (See‚ e.g. Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for D.C. (03-475) 542 U.S. 367 (2004) 334
Premium United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States