Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Hickox‚ 59 A.3d 1267 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals‚ 2013) Facts: Edwin Hickox attended a Major League Baseball retreat for umpires‚ where he received an umpire’s mask from a Wilson Sporting Goods Company representative. The Wilson representative claimed the mask had a new‚ safer design. Mr. Hickox wore the mask months later while working as an umpire for a game in Washington‚ D.C. During the game‚ the mask was struck by a foul-tipped ball. Mr. Hickox suffered
Premium
Illusory Promise | You be the Judge Case Study An illusory promise sounds like a promise or commitment‚ but is not really a promise or commitment to do anything. Because it does not bind the maker to do anything‚ it may not be treated as consideration to establish a contract. Culbertson v. Brodsky Culbertson had listed real estate for sale. Brodsky & Culbertson signed an option contract. Option document: - Brodsky delivers $5‚000 check to bank; - Bank holds
Premium Contract Contract law Law
| | SEGI University In Collaboration with University of Sunderland‚ UK | B.ENG (HONS) ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING | EAT 221 Industrial Studies ASSIGNMENT 1 | TITLE : Sayano-Shushenskaya Hydroelectric Power Station Disaster | DURATION: THREE WEEKS | Name: YOUSSOUF AHMED MOHAMED EUSMAN | UOS ID : 201301 | SCM ID: 021840 | Lecturer: Ms Anis Fariza Md Pazil | Word Count :2884 | Submission Form | Hardcopy: Yes/ No | Softcopy: Yes/No |
Premium Hydroelectricity Russia
Coursework Case Study Name: Yazhou Xiao Student No: 10408026 Date: 01/11/2012 Module Code: M5213 Tutor: Geoffrey Farmiloe This essay will aim to discuss the actions of Harvester Agricultural Machinery Co Ltd. In this case‚ the freight forwarding agent ‘Polaris Logistics PLC’ made an oral assurance with the importers (Harvester)‚ but in once transport the Polaris breach the assurance and two
Premium Contract
CRUZAN‚ BY HER PARENTS AND CO-GUARDIANS‚ CRUZAN ET UX. v. DIRECTOR‚ MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH‚ ET AL. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 497 U.S. 261; 110 S. Ct. 2841; 111 L. Ed. 2d 224; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3301 December 6‚ 1989‚ Argued June 25‚ 1990‚ Decided PRIOR HISTORY: CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI. DISPOSITION: 760 S. W. 2d 408‚ affirmed. JUDGES: REHNQUIST‚ C. J.‚ delivered the opinion of the Court‚ in which WHITE‚ O’CONNOR‚ SCALIA‚ and KENNEDY
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
CASE STUDY IN STAFFING: CHRISTIAN CORPORATION Junelle P. Dequina Bachelor of Science in Accountancy‚ 2nd year Block A MGT 101: Principles of Management and Organization Wed- Thurs‚ 1:00 – 2:30 pm TABLE OF CONTENTS I. TIME CONTEXT……………………………………………………...…………pg.3 II. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM……………………………………...…….pg.3 a. Problem……………………………………………………………………..….pg.3 i. sub problem………………………………………………………...…..pg.3 ii. sub problem………………………………………………………
Premium Management Corporation
Continuing Case: Honesty Testing at Carter Cleaning Company Maria Roel University of Texas Brownsville Introduction In the case study honesty testing at the Carter Cleaning Company‚ there are issues of theft. They find themselves struggling with the processes of screening for honest hardworking employees. The owners‚ Jennifer and her father‚ are looking for a way to minimize the employee turnover and more so is theft prone. Questions and Answers to the Questions What would be the advantages
Free Employment Theft Human resource management
transformation process of American schools and universities in respect of race’s diversifications date back to first court’s decisions in case of diversity of student’s groups. One of the fundamental decision in this case was court case‚ which influenced American society in 1954‚ known as “Brown vs. Board of Education and the Interest Convergence Dillema”. This case finally decided that diversity of public schools in terms of racial segregation is against constitution and has deleted
Premium United States Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court of the United States
HAVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL CASE STUDY FORMAT: l. From what perspective are you analyzing the case? ll. What is/are the major opportunity/problem? The major problems that was encountered by Mr. Morgan is the front desk personnel. They do not know how to handle their clients. lll. What is/are your objectives. lV A.) Facts of the case The Facts in the case involves the problems
Premium Knowledge Case study Scientific method
Obergefell v. Hodges is the Supreme Court Case that gay marriage legal in all fifty states. The case required that all states allow gay marriages and recognize gay marriages that happened in other states. It was a 5-4 decision that was based on the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th amendment. Obergefell wanted his marriage in Maryland to be recognized in Ohio‚ so he could collect the benefits from his partners death. Hodges is the director of the Ohio Health Department. The Supreme Court decided
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Marriage