known as technological determinism‚ which is essentially the understanding that technologies are the primary cause of the changes society has undergone and is to undergo. However despite its popularity‚ anthropologists should reject the technologically deterministic approach to media for a number of reasons. Namely that it reifies ‘technology’‚ treats it as a force free from societal influence when in fact it is entirely a social creation and that it uses simplified mono-causal explanations to explain
Premium Sociology Technology
Scepticism about technological determinism emerged alongside increased pessimism about techno-science in the mid-20th century‚ in particular around the use of nuclear energy in the production of nuclear weapons‚ Nazi human experimentation during World War II‚ and the problems of economic development in the third world. As a direct consequence‚ desire for greater control of the course of development of technology gave rise to disenchantment with the model of technological determinism in academia. Modern
Premium Technology Sociology
1. The relativist theory is the theory that morality is different for individual people. It is up to the individual themselves to determine what actions are considered right and wrong. In the relativist theory morality is defined by humans. The universalist theory differs because this theory states that morality is the same for all humans not the individual. When studying a different person‚ a relativist researcher would believe that their morality differs from the person they are studying because
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Truth
Determinism and Moral Responsibility Does it make sense to impose the death penalty? Reinstatement of the death penalty is a famous topic that has been argued across nations for many years. There is no right or wrong decision of whether or not to reinstate the death penalty because there are strong beliefs and opinions supporting either side. Even though there are strong beliefs and opinions supporting both sides‚ I still believe that death penalty should be imposed. The reason is that I believe
Premium Capital punishment Crime Death penalty
This may take the form of determinism or reductionism‚ both of which tend to explain social change by reducing it to one supposed autonomous and all-determining causal process. A more cautious assumption is that one process has relative causal priority‚ without implying that this process is completely autonomous and all-determining. There are multiple processes thought to contribute
Premium Sociology Psychology Culture
literature where knockouts of genes thought to be essential to a certain function did not produce as drastic impacts. Therefore‚ since a gene can participate in varied uses‚ and one function can be satisfied by many genes‚ Morange rejects rigid genetic determinism‚ and argues that genes‚ in encoding for proteins‚ only provide a structure in which networks and organisational hierarchies are built to give rise to complex functions. This appears to be similar to the idea put forth by Richard Dawkins in “The
Premium DNA Gene Genetics
TEHCNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM a popular and influential theory the theory of relationship between society and technology Just like these other deterministic theories‚ technological determinism seeks to explain social and historical phenomena in terms of one principal or determining factor. It is a doctrine of historical or causal primacy. The term ’technological determinism’ was apparently coined by the American sociologist and economist Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929) (Ellul 1964: xviii; Jones 1990:
Premium Sociology Mobile phone Technology
In the field of criminal law there exist established defences such as provocation and self-defence which mitigate the culpability of the accused. However‚ with recent advances in neuroscience this stands to change following developments revealing the genetic and biological functions of the human brain and their relationship with the person’s capacity to make decisions for oneself. Broader questions of whether the brain can be divorced from the self‚ and its ramifications for personal responsibility
Premium Crime Criminal law Law
core of the question of free will is a debate about the psychological causes of action. That is‚ is the person an autonomous entity who genuinely chooses how to act from among multiple possible options? Or is the person essentially just one link in a causal chain‚ so that the person’s actions are merely the inevitable product of lawful causes stemming from prior events‚ and no one ever could have acted differently than how he or she actually did? My thesis is that free will can be understood in terms
Premium Psychology Free will
Physics (from Ancient Greek: φύσις physis "nature") is a part of natural philosophy and a natural science that involves the study of matter[1] and its motion through space and time‚ along with related concepts such as energy and force.[2] More broadly‚ it is the general analysis of nature‚ conducted in order to understand how the universe behaves.[3][4][5] Physics is one of the oldest academic disciplines‚ perhaps the oldest through its inclusion of astronomy.[6] Over the last two millennia‚ physics
Premium Physics