GENERAL DUTY OF CARE 3 3.0 SUMMARY OF CASE “DONOGHUE V STEVENSON” 3 3.1 ACTIONS TAKEN BY DONOGHUE 4 3.2 THE RESPONSE OF MR. STEVENSON 5 4.0 THE IMPLICATION OF CASE 5 5.0 THE JUDGEMENT 6 6.0 THE CONCLUSION 7 7.0 REFERENCES 8 1.0 INTRODUCTION Introduction to students the Lord Atkin’s concept of general duty of care‚ summary of the case “Donoghue v Stevenson” and its implication. It will also briefly explain
Premium Duty of care Tort Law
seek justice. What makes these kind of cases complicated is the “What would have been if…?” scenarios where one can only guess what the outcome of the treatment would have been had a different course of treatment been chosen because the proximate causes of injuries are not easy to determine. Historically it has been the state legislature’s responsibility to establish‚ implement and regulate the medical tort system and laws and guidelines related to them (Conover‚ Zeitler‚ p.1). There is‚ however
Premium Physician Medicine Supreme Court of the United States
decision we begin to rationalize why we made the decision we made. We begin to explain things in a manner that might not be right or wrong but just for peace of mind. Daniel Gilbert further explains the concept of explaining and rationalizing our actions or inaction’s in his written essay named "Immune to Reality". In this essay‚ Gilbert argues that our psychological immune system will do anything in its power to protect oneself. Our psychological immune system fights off any negative emotions. This
Premium Emotion
Ethics in Action II Liberty University Segment One: The Divorce 1. If this was your client‚ what would you say and do? Be specific. Why would you respond this way? First‚ I would let her speak without interruption‚ because she is expressing that she has had a lot of time thinking about divorce‚ since she has expressed that she has not been happy in a long time. Second‚ I would explore with her the consequences of her decision within the family. I would suggest family therapy too‚ explaining
Premium Ethics Conflict Morality
Advocacy and Social Action Yecheskel Lunger SWK class 613: Practice III Professor Peter Wildeman Introduction: In this paper I will discuss how I can use advocacy and social action in my field placement. I will detail whom I consider to be a population at risk‚ and how I can empower them to achieve an equal status the rest of society‚ according to the guidelines provided by the book Generalist Practice with Organizations and Communities. The populations at risk in my field placement Populations
Premium Bullying Educational psychology Disability
Arizona v. Gant PALS480-Capstone June 20‚ 2012 The Parties • Plaintiff – State of Arizona • Defendant – Rodney Gant • Appellant – State of Arizona • Respondent – Rodney Gant Procedural History • Respondent‚ Rodney Gant‚ was arrested for driving with a suspended license. Subsequent to the search of the Gant’s vehicle officers found cocaine in the back seat. At trial Gant moved to have the evidence suppressed denied that there was probable cause to search the vehicle‚ but did
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Anti-Hero Called “V” John Doe ENG 225 Introduction to Film No one June 16‚ 2012 Anti-Hero Called “V” V for Vendetta in many ways is a movie that has been done before. It presents a post apocalyptic landscape (ex: 1984 (1984)‚ Clockwork Orange (1971)) where a totalitarian leadership rises from the ashes of chaos offering salvation‚ only to deliver oppression to the masses while demanding blind obedience in return‚ or else! In this society/film we are given the various archetype villains
Premium V for Vendetta Totalitarianism Nineteen Eighty-Four
1. Case Name‚ Citation and Court Hampton v. Federal Express Corporation‚ 917 F.2d 1119 (8th Cir. 1990) 2. Key Facts a. Carl Gerome Hampton was a thirteen year old boy that was diagnosed with cancer and needed a blood transplant. b. Carl was a patient at Children’s Memorial Hospital in Omaha‚ Nebraska. This hospital sent five samples of Carl’s blood to the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Iowa City so they could find a match between five other people for a bone marrow transplant. c. FedEx
Free Common law Law United States
NOTES OF CASES THECASEOF THE SLIPPERY EQUITY IN Re Vandervell’s Trusts (No. 2)‚’ Lord Denning M.R. said: “ (‘ Hard cases make bad law ’) is a maxim which is quite misleading. It should be deleted from our vocabulary. It comes to this: ‘Unjust decisions make good law’: whereas they do nothing of the kind. Every unjust decision is a reproach to the law or to the judge who administers it.”a Now that it has been decided that there is to be no appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal‚ it is worth
Premium Law Common law Criminal law
Henry V – William Shakespeare There can be little doubt that Shakespeare intended to present his protagonist in “Henry V” as the popular hero-king. His efforts are mainly concentrated on the portraiture of this “star of England”‚ King Henry‚ whom he deliberately chose out of the page of history as the finest representative of the best distinctive type of English character. He wanted his play to lead triumphantly to an English victory against overwhelming odds at Agincourt. What is not agreed among
Premium Henry VI of England Henry V of England Henry IV of England