Case Report Worksheet Case name including citation? Fisher V Bell [1961] 1 QB 394‚ [1960] 3 WLR 919‚ [1960] 3 All ER 731‚ HKSAR V Chow Kwong Chun (unrep.‚ HCMA No 836 of 2001) and HKSAR V Wan Hon Sik [2001] 3 HKLRD 283 were cited in the judgeme Is it a civil case or criminal case? It is a criminal case as Yu Wai Chuen was charged by HKSAR. Who are the parties? The plaintiff (prosecutor) was HKSAR and defendant was Yu Wai Chuen. This was an appeal by Yu Wai Chuen against HKSAR (respondent).
Premium Ratio decidendi Stare decisis Appeal
Case: The USS Florida The atmosphere in a Trident nuclear submarine is generally calm and quiet. Even pipe joints are cushioned to prevent noise that might tip off a pursuer. The Trident ranks among the world’s most dangerous weaponsCswift‚ silent‚ armed with 24 long‑range missiles carrying 192 nuclear warheads. Trident crews are the cream of the Navy crop‚ and even the sailors who fix the plumbing exhibit a white‑collar decorum. The culture aboard ship is a low‑key‚ collegial one in which sailors
Premium United States Navy Submarine
Journal of Case Research in Business and Economics Coffee Wars - The Big Three: Starbucks‚ McDonald’s and Dunkin’ Donuts Michael G. Brizek South Carolina State University ABSTRACT Coffee – for some‚ a morning cannot begin without it. Many daily rituals include it. It can be seductive‚ enticing‚ and addictive. Hard-core coffee drinkers pride themselves on their coffee palettes‚ their refined ability to distinguish “good” coffee from “bad.” And once a diehard coffee drinker finds his favorite
Premium Starbucks Coffee
A rare criminal case comes out to court‚ the case is on an out of hospital birth of two twins. The convict is a 57-year-old Utah midwife who was sentenced to half of a year in prison. The midwife committed manslaughter‚ the judge finally decided after he calls the trial‚ the most difficult trial he has ever had to decide. The midwife told the parents of the twins that she could surely deliver the twins safely‚ but whenever one baby came out purple and unable to breathe‚ Sorensen used outdated techniques
Premium Crime Murder Prison
Every case starts with an alleged crime. In the Sandoval case‚ the crime was murder. Sandoval was soon put into the system after he was arrested. After the arrest‚ Sandoval would have been book and then gone to his first appearance hearing where he is informed that he was getting charged with first-degree murder. Next would be the preliminary hearing where the defense would have received an arraignment‚ formally charging the suspect of the crime and asking what his plea is. Some states do not have
Premium Criminal law Crime Law
meaning of "stop". The judge found that in this circumstance "stop" meant halt and wait for police or other officials to investigate the accident. A literal interpretation was against the purpose of the law. 3a Smith v Hughes SMITH v HUGHES (1960) 1 WLR 830 LORD PARKER CJ: These are six appeals by way of case stated by one of the stipendiary magistrates sitting at Bow Street‚ before whom informations were preferred by police officers against the defendants‚ in each case that she ‘being a common
Premium Contract
Intramuros. Constitutional role Composition A person must meet the following requirements in order to be appointed to the Supreme Court: (1) natural-born citizenship; (2) at least 40 years old; (3) must have been for fifteen years or more a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines.[2] An additional constitutional requirement‚ though less precise in nature‚ is that a Justice “must be a person of proven competence‚ integrity‚ probity‚ and independence.” [3]
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Court
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY HILL‚ John Lyster - Disbarred by Consent on November 24‚ 2009 by the Court of Appeals for mishandling two (2) domestic relations cases in which he failed to take prompt action‚ he implied he had paid a judge to expedite his client’s case‚ failed to file an Information Report causing dismissal of his client’s appeal‚ and failed to deposit and maintain his client’s retainer in trust‚ in violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1‚ 1.3‚ 1.4‚ 1.5(a)‚ 1.15‚ 7.1(b) and
Premium Lawyer Supreme Court of the United States
Ferguson v Wilson (1866) LR 2 Ch App 77 ‘The company itself cannot act in its own person… it can only act through directors’‚ Cairns LJ‚ pp 89-90. Ernest v Nicholls (1857) 6 HL Cas 401 ‘[The shareholders] can only act through the directors‚ and the acts of the individual shareholders have no effect whatever on the company at large’‚ Lrd Wensleydale‚ p 419. Bushell v Faith 1969 1 All ER 1002 Where directors were empowered by the articles to increased voting rights on any resolution to remove
Premium Stock Board of directors Fiduciary
Cases Summary CJUS 350 Angela McIntosh The three cases that are mentioned and studied are Brady v. Maryland‚ Giglio v. United States‚ and United States v. Agurs. These cases are important to the history of how cases are presented and with what evidence is made available to the jury. With Brady v. Maryland‚ it was the first time that the Supreme Court recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause is to ensure and guarantee that the criminal defendants are given
Premium Jury United States Constitution United States